Member Info for 13thmonkey

surely outbound travel is a non-issue anyway, it's inbound that's the problem. I'm not sure what you are trying to say here.

If that's in the public domain then it's quite easy to find. Or are you looking to argue that it's not justified at todays prices?

That's only asking for feedback, doing something is a different story. I'd like to see some feedback from early adopters.

But there still are no rapid tests, so the gov couldn't do nothing, I think they've been aware of the need for low cost and rapid for many months, it's just not been available.

My only hope is it's a soft launch, and the fanfare will come once they've had dinner interest for through and test it all of the systems for sign up etc in the real world.

Zero, you should listen to no one else but yourself, and question that regularly, you should also question this, and question that I said to question it. There's no need to question what onenose said, he's added nothing recently, just the odd comment.

Garonne, what a pile of bs

The statistically significant phrase simply means that between the two samples there is a lot of overlap and they can't be confidently said to be from different populations. However... As the sample size decreased the gap has to get bigger before you can be confident. So on the larger combined study there is a difference as the sample size is bog enough to prove it, on the sub populations it's less certain that there is a difference. This is also significantly impacted by the spread of the outcomes for each sample, if the spread is large then the overlap is large and the gap needs to be bigger. If, for instance, the outcomes from the placebo had a wide spread, as might be expected from a disease who's symptoms vary from day to day, then it's could make a positive outcome seem to be less positive.

Is it priced in? If it is priced in turn it's worth less than 30m (Mcap), or maybe 2m in profit. So I'd suggest it's not priced in, as the breath test will surely be worth a lot more than that in terms of profit and therefore Mcap.

Weren't there Japanese super toilets that analysed health from the individual's waste water?

Honest question, why do we need investors? If the lft works out what's the point of them? There's no fund raise needed. Let's say that they offered another 100m for some percentage of the company, what would we do with that money, the limit now is not cash it's brainpower, there's a limited number of those brains available so hiring and getting up to speed would take years.

If I have to go to work on the train (to London) then a pass would have me able to access the train, the tube, shops, the office and the return trip maybe a restaurant in the evening. So not just a venue, but normal life. Now I wouldn't travel every day, so I'd only take a test when I travel and try and pack activities in on those days.

Cinders, any test, aside from one done directly in front of someone and valid for that 'viewing' only is open to fraud. However the game here to get the R number substantially below 1, not 0.8-0.9 but in the 0.1-0.3 range. There will be people who cheat, providing that number is small (<10% perhaps) it really doesn't matter. There will also be people who show negative, but have only just been infected and by the end of the 24hr period they will be starting to become infectious. The goal is not 100% containment, just sufficient containment to dramatically reduce spread.

Are these meant to be negative comments, none of them use Affimers, so they are not comparable to Avacta's tests.

I'm not at all concerned by the delay, there will be other sites, the tech is sufficiently proven that others who were waiting on capacity might just move up the queue. There's a large population of stations, I'm happy with that. Might delay things a little but not much.

Thoughts and prayers are surely enough.

Depends, for covid they are using affimers and speakers, for everything else no, simply because they are specific to what's being looked for.

Assume it isn't, I got the impression tests for the public were further away than that. Supported tests maybe, IE need a trained person to supervise might be quicker.

Thanks for letting us know. We'll miss your insight.

Have you sold them?