Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
The market simply doesnt believe tiny little Solgold can bring this giant tier 1 to production... and rightly so.
Only a full, water tight financing agreement will push this share price anywhere near where it should be without a bid or free carry JV.
But even if a full Finance package is agreed, I believe the market would soon begin to lose interest all over again and the share price spike would fall away.. as is traditional with Solgold..... I think the wider market would still doubt our boards ability to deliver it on time or without any crippling overspend, as they have never shown anything that displays an ability to do so.
I am a big believer in the asset, just very
LM, my fear is that the market is simply not willing to attribute proper value to anything we say or do and it'll only do so once some proper cash is put on the table in the form of an offer. In the meantime, every time we release something which, on the face of it, is good news , the market shrugs its collective shoulders and ignores it.
Jezzoo you base your investment strategy on peoples posts with ticks.
I will base mine on understanding the fundamentals of any company I invest in.
According to you if we don't sell we are doomed.
If you really believe that you should sell now, as why would anyone buy us unless we can do this ourselves.
If we can't then a buyer will watch us collapse.
It is therefore a good thing that you talk nonsense.
LM, I'd refer you to Bozi's excellent post yesterday. He hit the nail on the head.
Yes, I do think we should sell Cascabel as I'm not sure how we'll create more value in anything like a reasonable time frame.
I'd always brought into the original strategy of this company I.e prove-up and flog the asset before moving on to the next one. This was a truly exciting and enticing prospect and played well to our strengths. All this production stuff is, as far as I'm concerned, pie-in-the- sky.
In any event, we are in dire need of some good news at the moment.
The big thing is, are the big boys prepared to allow Solgold to keep diluting their future in this major copper/gold and silver deposit?
At some point they either lose out or make a move, it’s down to Solgold to put up such a money spinning scenario in take off’s or similar that the big boys say enough we will bid for it now.
Remember the 55 year life of mine, who the hell wouldn’t want that when demand for these resources are going to sky rocket for many many years, so I can only suggest people relax, Solgold have many cards they can play imo of course
Atb
Good Grief Qaudy, you just don't get do you.
The ticks say it all.
;)
Whatever way you put it, Ship, it's cheap :)
Honestly Q, you say you've been doing this for 40 years and yet you appear to have learnt the square root of f all.
Oh well, you carry on believing whatever you want, I feel you'll be in for a very nasty surprise if a funding package were ever to be implemented.
Addicknt, I begin to doubt who you are.
This is basic accounting. When we get funding, the equity part is a small percentage. With the advent of construction, we are leveraged in such a way that the books balance from the extra money and extra equity. From that perspective nothing changes.
However the way we are valued changes big time.
We have seen this even in this share.
When we had just over 600 million shares, I brought in at 4.6 pence. Today we have nearly four times as many shares and we are at a higher price. This is because we moved from two donkeys and a drill rig, to our current position. Financing Alpala will move us on again.
LM, you're referring to buying in the market. I'm talking about a fund raise with new equity which, if it were to happen today, would be in the 24/25p range...if we were lucky. The dilution would be significant. There are no funding options which would help private investors, hence the need to flog the asset. Bear in mind NM would be in the same boat as us and can you really see him being willing to have all his influence disappear, because I can't.
Q, virtually none of what you said is true, particularly the bit about the sp rising once new shares have been issued.
Bargain price is a kind way to put it
Sorry not 300 million shares, I meant 300 million dollars worth of shares.
Good morning addicknt, as I said been doing this over 40 years.
If 300 million extra shares issued along with bonds, loans and offtake.
Then the share price increases with the increased shares.
This is because we would finally move from an NPV valuation to a NAV valuation.
Remember we now have the capital to construct Alpala, and with funding arranged the market will be factoring in future earnings.
As I am sure you know when we have a NAV we are valued in a totally different way.
Next it makes it far easier to raise funds for our other exploration projects.
Yes some further dilution but also loans against the company, because we will have a large asset that has future earnings.
I am sure you get the rest.
It's Sunstone but Solgold gets a mention and it's all very positive. We're at an absolute bargain price right now. GLA
https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/986478/sunstone-metals-ecuador-projects-continue-to-deliver-taylor-collison-986478.html
Following mining optimisation studies, the production profile for the Cascabel
project is based on a capacity of 25Mtpa, fed by the underground block cave at
Alpala. The project is expected to reach nameplate capacity in the fourth year
from the start of process plant operations with first ore expected in mid-2029.
The initial Mineral Reserve represents only 21% of Measured and Indicated
Resources tonnes and approximately 38% of contained metal, providing
significant opportunity for conversion of further M&I Resources in time. This is
likely a reflection of the technical work required to add subsequent caves to the
current operation which would add little to today’s NPV and IRR due to their time
horizon, but which may otherwise have delayed the study. As such, SOLG
estimates there is potential to extend the mine life by in excess of 50 years (76
total). This could be accompanied by a modular expansion in processing capacity
to >30Mtpa, supporting a longer peak production profile as grades begin to
decline around year 9...."
Really, truly, the end!
Z
"...Whilst TAM has potential to add cream to Alpala’s NPV, we believe the benefits go
beyond our hypothetical mine plan. In our modelled scenario, with TAM giving
way to Alpala’s higher grade feed from FY30 and reduced to nil in FY31, there
remains potential to extract a further 254Mt @ 0.29% CuEq based on Indicated
material within the updated MRE. This could provide flexibility and cash flow
‘insurance’ as the block cave develops. TAM’s underground mineralisation also
appears promising and we believe is likely to grow substantially from the current
resource (Indicated: 172.0Mt @ 0.35% CuEq and Inferred: 69.4Mt @ 0.36%
CuEq)...."
Z
"...TAM open-pit mineral inventory could boost NPV…
Whilst TAM was not included in the Alpala PFS, we believe the deposit shows
clear potential for eventual incorporation into the mine plan at this early stage.
SolGold has also planned work including assessment of potential near-surface
mining options at the Cascabel project. The premise appears compelling with
production able to be brought forward and reduced funding risk, in our view, as
TAM offers cashflow whilst SolGold initiates the cave at Alpala. We therefore
model a conceptual scenario below to highlight potential upsides (based on our
updated 25Mtpa operation). Capital expenditure is assumed to commence in
FY25 (in-line with our Alpala only model) and an additional ~US$250m of
growth capex is estimated, including US$80m of pre-production mining at TAM,
in line with other near-surface porphyry projects in Latam.
We then leverage TAM’s higher-grade outcropping zone containing 28.0Mt @
0.43% CuEq and 10.5Mt @ 0.55% CuEq to kickstart production in FY27, ramping
up into a complimentary mine schedule with Alpala in FY30. Recoveries are
estimated as in-line with Alpala at 87% for Cu and 77% for Au and opex costs are
assumed flat with lower open pit mining costs offset by an uptick in transport
costs to the Alpala hosted plant. The result would be a US$239m increase in our
Jun’23E NPV to US$3,598m...."
Z
"...Aladdin’s cave: By-product production will make Alpala one of the
world’s largest gold mines…
Whilst no surprise given the 21.7Moz gold contained in M&I Resource grading
0.25 g/t Au, Alpala is set to produce an exceptional 7.6Moz of by-product gold on
the initial PFS mine plan. Production is expected to peak at 829koz and average
680koz per annum in the first five years following initial cave ramp up. This
would place the project within the top 15 gold mines by production worldwide
based on 2021 figures, and the third largest in Latin America. We believe the
significant by-product output will likely prove advantageous project financing
discussions, with potential to issue a precious metal stream or royalty...."
Next Step:
"...SolGold is currently progressing additional optimisations to be included in a PFS
Addendum, slated for H2 CY22, ahead of completion of the DFS, expected in H2
CY23. Engagement with the relevant government departments is anticipated from
Q2 CY22 to commence fiscal discussions and the permitting process. This could
lead to a potential construction start in Q4’24 and first ore in 2029 in an Alpalaonly scenario. SOLG has a cash position of US$58.4m (Feb’22) to progress its
studies; at a guided cash burn rate of US$70 – 80m per annum, additional
funding is likely required prior to publication of the FS...."
Z
"...Specific tax incentives at Solaris’ Warintza project include a 5% reduction of
income tax, fixing the income tax rate applicable to the Company at 20%,
exemption from the capital outflow tax, as well as the exemption of all import
duties for the import of goods needed for new investments in the Project. SolGold
itself announced an initial IPA in November 2021. The agreement included
investment intentions as well as tax stability for 15-years and international
arbitration in London if there are any disputes in relation to the Cascabel Project.
We would expect to see an updated IPA in early 2024, with the current agreement
covering planned investments through to the end of 2023 which would be aptly
timed with the upcoming Feasibility Study. The expected 3,000-person strong
camp is also a significant source of skilled employment within the area...."
Z
"....Ecuador has been subject to civil unrest in recent weeks, sparked by indigenous
group protests surrounding the cost-of-living crisis. On Thursday the government
agreed to concessions including a 15c cut in fuel price. The government also
pledged to cancel an executive decree to increase oil output, and change a mining
decree spurring development to add additional environmental protections and to
respect archaeological remains. Whilst the situation appears delicate, Ecuador has
made significant strides towards attracting FDI in mining projects. The country
has risen from a score of 45 (2015) to 73 (2021) on the Mining Investment
Attractiveness Index according to the Fraser Institute, surpassing Chile (69) and
Peru (61).
Several Ecuadorian explorers have announced work towards Investment
Protection Agreements (IPA) with the Government of Ecuador in the past weeks
including Solaris Resources and Adventus Mining. The IPA provides a foundation
of certainty with respect to the legal framework governing future projects,
including stable mining regulations, security of title and investment for the term
of the agreement, as well as new tax incentives to accelerate development. ..."
Z
"....Alpala now contributes ~US$2.3bn to our SOTP based on 85% ownership and a
target P/NPV of 0.8x our ~US$3.4bn DCF (as at Jun’23E). We add a further
US$72m assuming 0.3x our ~US$240m DCF for the conceptual inclusion TAM.
We then include US$150m for SolGold’s regional portfolio including US$75m
for Porvenir and adjust for net cash and outstanding options and warrants to
derive a GBp85/sh target, implying ~200% upside. SOLG has a cash position of
US$58m (Feb’22) to but we note that at a cash burn of US$70-80m pa
additional funds will likely be required during H2’22...."
END
Z
"....SOLG is assessing optimisations that will be included in a PFS Addendum due in
H2 CY22, in preparation for the Definitive Feasibility Study (“DFS”) planned for
completion in H2 CY23. This is likely to include upside which we believe could
be unlocked through a satellite open pit at TAM. Our conceptual scenario
estimates TAM could bring forward first output from the Alpala plant by two
years, enhancing the NPV by US$240m whilst also providing flexibility and
derisking the Alpala cave operation. The Alpala Mineral Reserve is another
avenue of upside, currently representing only 21% of Measured and Indicated
Resource tonnes and ~38% of contained metal. Inclusion of additional material
could see the throughput jump to over 30Mtpa by adding another module,
though follow-on caves are beyond the scope of key technical work at this stage.
Enhanced fiscal terms could be agreed in an updated IPA (early 2024), with
Solaris Resources recently announcing a 5% reduction in income tax to 20%
amongst other incentives, setting precedent and providing further confidence in
Ecuador for FDI..."
cont'd
".....The PFS initial mine plan targets the Alpala high grade core within one cave,
with copper grades expected to average over 0.75% (~1.35% CuEq) within the
first 10 years of production. As a result of strong by-product contribution and
highly productive bulk mining methods, Alpala enjoys low cash costs of
US$(0.40)/lb Cu and AISC of US$0.06/lb Cu on a post by-product basis. This
places the project well within the first decile of the global copper cost curve
(according to WoodMac 2032 estimates). Within this is an exceptional negative
AISC average of US$(1.38)/lb in first five years from achieving nameplate
capacity (190ktpa Cu, 680kozpa Au and 1.3Mozpa Ag average annual production
in that period). These quantities would place Alpala within the top 15 and 30
projects globally for gold and copper production respectively (vs. 2021 global
production figures), and in the top ranks of undeveloped junior held projects...."
cont'd