Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Always interesting how people go to Tracy Hoeg for data on COVID vax issues.
Always worth a read of this before you make your mind up one what she posts, why she posts
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/dumpster-diving-in-vaers-doctors-fall-into-the-same-trap-as-antivaxxers/
Agreed Doc83
Picking up on your post the other day I'll be a bit concerned as well if we have no news by the end of September. Not that I expect it to shift the sp, but we should at least have the peer reviewed jounal paper by then.
If we do however get to the end of September (the summer :) without Activ 2 results and / or a platform trial then I think RM will have to give a transparent update to the market. They revised the Activ 2 results to the 'summer' so I suspect he's unwittingly tied himself in to a half year update. As ever good luck all
The fact vaccines do not protect against long covid is of great relevance to
SNG shareholders as there is a possibility our drug may offer protection..
So any balanced poster will get that is the reason I am interetsed in the
King's College London Study...... ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with being anti-vax
Only the idiots trying to detract from a normal debate are pushing that narrative..
It's getting boring now ...............
Grow up AXE..... Clearly stated I am not anti-vax I have had the vacination and
the booster as I declared earlier so stop lying ......
The wheels really have come off this board the last few days/weeks!
To Top it off, Mani-c has come out as an Anti Vaxxer to boot!!
Her ramping and shame no no-boundaries! Some old LTH's had relatives that died and past away or were seriously ill prior vaccine roll outs! investors on her beware of this disgusting individual.
Shame on you Mani-c pushing this agenda to prove a point and yet again highjack the conversation
You are a dangerous person on here!
Ghia
The FDA approved Covid vaccines based on added protection...NOT because they
prevent patients dying..... There has never been a claim by any covid vaccine manufacturer
that their vaccine will prevent you dying...You are talking nonsense...!
Mani - You have a really weird personality.
The vaccine manufacturers ensured they had zero liability.
I took the vaccine because I felt it would aid my chances if I caught covid. They indeed claimed it would prevent you dying from covid that was the primary end point of the trials numpty!
Imagine the Lawsuits if they did claim that!!!
Ghia
Covid vaccines were descibed as added protection NEVER
'to prevent you dying from Covid" None of the Vaccine producers made any such
claim...How could they??? ...That is the most ridiculous thing I have seen on here..
Stop making things up for goodness sake......
L
Manifesto - Your point being LC is not prevented by vaccines as shown by a recent study. Sure that is interesting and presents an opportunity.
But as FTC pointed out the vaccines never claimed to prevent LC they claimed to prevent you dying from covid how many of those LC suffered would have died without the vaccines? We’ll never know that but I’d wager probably quite a few.
Anyway LC could be a lucrative market for SNG.
Ghia
I was discussing Long Covid in my conversation with FTC...Not the vaccine...Based on
the report fom King's College London on LC.... So calm down Old Chap!!!!!
FTC7 - Mani will never concede you must remember they are always right on every point.
It’s impossible for them to even consider points of merit in the opposing view.
Fairly sure last time I checked more people benefited from the vaccines than suffered. Which is impressive given the shear volume of inoculations. Nothing is perfect and I’m sure there is still science to be discovered around their function.
If you are keen to make your point you could just post a valid link
FTC Just google the topic....Endless articles on it!
"Biggest pharmaceutical lawsuits by settlement amounT"
A search for " Pfizer "on the page that link took me to returned no results
"One of the major findings was that the vaccines
offer no protection against Long Covid!!!!"
Did anyone ever suggest they did? And BTW I think your ! key is stuck.
Joey.... Did you see the thread on here last week about the Study on Long Covid
from King's College London ? One of the major findings was that the vaccines
offer no protection against Long Covid!!!!! ATB!
Justice Department Announces Largest Health Care Fraud ...
https://www.justice.gov › ... › News
2 Sept 2009 — (hereinafter together "Pfizer") have agreed to pay $2.3 billion, the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Department of ...
It amazes me how many people are just so brainwashed by the media that you can’t say anything negative about the vaccines even when there is actual evidence saying otherwise!
BS post you say? I’ve linked 2 factual sources to a science paper and some medical researchers on Twitter. 2 of the 300 kids in the study had to be admitted to hospital.
How many kids end up with Covid induced myocarditis? Denmark did a study and results were 0/74611.
The risk/benefit calculation has drastically changed which is why Denmark have changed policy and no longer allow u18s the vaccine.
oj ....My last post to you..
IF you had watched the video link I posted you would find it was nothing to do with the
vaccine approval process, but something much later when the vaccine had been rolled
out and was about reported side effects...... KEEP UP!
and I havent any agenda - i was simply calling out a BS post that the original poster didnt have the balls to put in the final conclusion of a report - trying to show a problem with a vaccine that the report concluded 'full recovery'. I not the one with the agenda, The original poster did though - but through your sng specs you cant seperate anything out that in your mind is anti-sng. This wasnt anti sng but anti-vax and you jumped right in when you didnt need to
Denmark have announced they will no longer offer mRNA vaccines to 18 and under. From risk/benefit analysis is the correct decision. Possibly will see other countries follow suit.
"" Let's stick to the facts and that is that Pfizer tried to conceal the documents..
They were only released under the freedom of information act when US Journalists
went to Court....Now why do you think they wanted to keep them hidden????""
Again this is just nonsense - your still watching the nutty on the video instead of looking at what actually happened. Pfizer didnt hide any documents - they had to give them to the FDA for the drug approval process...The FDA then decided to release them in a request under the freedom of information act...keep reading and digging
""The document was released by the FDA in response to a Freedom of Information Act request from Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency. The group asked the FDA for all of its documents related to the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine — or around 329,000 pages, plus other files — four days after the agency gave full approval to the vaccine.
The FDA did not oppose releasing the information, but denied the group’s request for expedited processing, leading PHMPT to sue the agency in federal court in September, as MedPage Today has explained.
The FDA argued that the group’s request would require releasing 80,000 pages a month, which the agency said had never happened before with any FOIA request, and was difficult if not impossible with its current staffers, who would need to go through the documents line by line and redact exempted material. The FDA proposed releasing 500 pages a month instead, which it said was the standard rate. ""