Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
a year old, LOL
ok guys have a nice day and watch this to test new highs
I don’t think the date matters, if we don’t know about it, it’s not in the price. e.g, It could be a year old and just been published.
Re > Last updated at 06/04/2020, 08:07:42
I would question... they are California?, in which case they are currently at just 03:15am... Or am I wrong
Results in 6 weeks based on this vid, not long to wait. Gla.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2riZZyvneIw
listen to it all but pay attention at 3:40min
there is, you just cant see it ;)
All I'm suggesting is follow the links and look at the original source. Why isn't interferon mentioned there?
again, the website has been updated today at 8:07
I don’t think the date matters does it?
A Stanford HIVDB team website. Last updated at 06/04/2020, 08:07:42
Interesting but dated 22/03/2020
no problem, dont listen to trolls,
SNG001 works for COPD and it will work on covid19, the question is at what %, but we should be getting a few leaks soon with update
Btw KAjo - Very much appreciate you posting this, fantastic insight and the sort of posts needed here.
just click on my link and u see it clearly .. all good so far, we will re rate from this level, chart looking good too
Distressed seller must be on fumes, not much left i reckon, once he is out we go into 60s-70s
Statistically 11 is the magic number :-).
Promising, We are using Beta too which is thought to be more suited, from my understanding.
https://covdb.stanford.edu/search/?article=Chen20b
Thanks for posting. This is the ket takeaway for me.
OK I will look
@Sacrabbeatle : OK, but my link is also linked from there - it looks like the original source?
This is what I read fro. That link
Chen20b
(medRxiv)
SARS-CoV-2
Danoprevir/r +/- Nebulized Interferon x 4-12 days
Observational
11
Moderate PCR-confirmed COVID-19 penumonia (SaO2>=94%; PaO2/FiO2<300). 2 treatment-naïve persons; 9 persons with worsening on lopinavir/r + nebulized interferon.
All 11 patients becamse afebrile, had improved respiratory synptoms, radiological improvement, and negative PCRs.
Hi @kajo99. It's a bit confusing, because according to this :
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.22.20034041v1
it was a combination of danoprevir + ritonavir, with interferon not mentioned.
Maybe some mix-up in the Stanford database?
Good positive news, but population sample of 11 too small to gather any Concrete conclusion. But bodes well for further studies
https://covdb.stanford.edu/search/?study=clinical-studies
If you scroll down now to observational 11
Danoprevir/r +/- Nebulized Interferon x 4-12 days
Read last sentence; All 11 patients becamse afebrile, had improved respiratory synptoms, radiological improvement, and negative PCRs.
Now its not our trial SNG001 but they use nebulised ifn and seems very positive,
Should rerate from current level
GLA