Adam Davidson, CEO of Trident Royalties, discusses offtake milestones and catalysts to boost FY24. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
There are two obvious points on communication although one is more fanciful than the other.
Either they know and are deliberately withholding information from shareholders. I’m guessing you can figure out which one that is, or they are just not ready yet.
Whether or not you’re happy with them not being ready depends on how realist your views are about the timeframes that drug development takes.
I’m happy to wait and our case remains a strong one. BP and government bodies don’t care how impatient you are for progress on trials or JV’s. They move when they’re ready.
We had a healthy financial balance at the last interims and the trials haven’t started yet so our financial situation should still be good. We just need partners for the next phase. I’m confident those partners exist
You'll get another chance in a couple of months Doc. It'll then be a whole year with just one 4 minute Proactive interview from our CEO. An interview in which the interviewer seemed to think Synairgen had a new drug.
Posting again for new shareholders who won't know who he is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3gJ9cP7fC8
I was chatting to someone the other day who holds E-Therapeutics (ETX). They have decided to delist and might have a go for the Nasdaq in the US. But in the meantime it will be very hard to trade shares as they’ll provide a simple matched bargain facility. Not great news for holders over there who are livid.
My big concern has always been that Synairgen do something similar, because clearly they don’t have the time of day for shareholders. I also recall the AGM last year when I asked RM directly about comms and the lack of, and he looked at me confused and not appreciative of the suggestion!
Trolls? Marsden has created this 'hate' culture towards the company.
Based on the current position of the company, it only points to failure.
Do I want the company to succeed? Yes.
Do I think the board of directors hate shareholders? Yes.
Who would spend their time on a board making the same points repeatedly about a company or drug they believe doesn’t have a future.
Trolls are irrational.
But science-minded people are not, which is why Sakura7 is not what they pretend to be.
You started the "charade " Fruits. Maybe stick to the end of the world
Just for the record the vibrating mesh nebuliser didn’t enter the market until the 90’s.
The wager is a con trick, play on devices, never mind effectiveness and efficiency, that doesn’t matter a hoot with tricky Sukura7.
Agreed Jint. Apologies to genuine LTH’s who’ve had to endure the charade. My last response on the matter. Hopefully real news soon!
I have to say, you guys have covered yourselves in no glory today. Massive hole dig and all out of excuses. It’s sad really, how desperate you’ve become. I hope genuine investors prevail, despite your tawdry efforts.
Fruits are you accepting the bet? It’s a straight forward yes or no. You have made serious accusations on a public forum. If you believed you were right you would accept odds of 3:1 . Last chance
Fruitznveg
Don’t rise to the shenanigans being played out here with spurious wagers from a suspect poster.
Sakura offered her PHD research, I accepted. Waiting for her to supply the name of said paper which will be stored in electronic archive online, as they all are. No need for you to interfere in this very straight forward process docDan. None at all.
So, Sakura, the name of your research paper?
And if I go through this process are you all going to pay me damages ?
I doubt it . That is why I like this crisp bet . One fact. My PhD thesis describes administering IFN by a nebuliser. If that is true then on to was an interferonologist. Yo can read the whole thesis if you want. I am prepared to bet 100,000 but if that is too much 10,000 and I will give you 3:1
Sukura7
I suspect you are fully aware there are 3 main types of nebuliser.
The vibrating mesh nebuliser being the most effective and efficient, the very one that is employed for administering SNG001 formula.
If we are take you at face value, then the nebulisers you claim to have used would have been either ‘Jet’ or ‘Ultrasonic’, and certainly not in the same class as the ‘Aerogen’ nebuliser.
Little wonder your results back in the day were somewhat inconclusive using an inferior delivery product along with an unsuitable INF formula for adequate respiratory penetration.
Sakura of course Fruits won't take your bet. He's an old bluffer who has been found out yet again.
There is another way to resolve this though, and that's to use one of the unimpeachable members of this bb to verify anything you want to present to rescue your good name. It'll have to include your work profile though, which is what you based most of your claims on. Nobody giives a sh.it about what you did at Uni, even if you were writing about Ifns ( no offence but seriously )
You said you have a long career in Interferonology and I'd like to suggest Doc83 or Wpa5 ( if they'd accept - or others if they decline ) to act as arbiters of your veracity and verify this.
If you are genuine you will accept this and they will offer assurances to protect your identity and I'm sure, not use anything you disclose maliciously.
It's all ridiculous frankly but you have been slandered and there's zero chance of any resolution unless you prove who you are.
Just take the bet big man
That is not an answer to my question. Are you taking the bet. I will provide my PhD to a solicitor for your inspection. Tracking down the PhD and reading it before deciding to take the bet is not the way these things work
I'll contact the library next week and we'll soon find out the truth of your claims. This will be easy.
Aether - are you taking the bet?
Fruits - this is the quietest you have been for a while. We are all waiting. You have made serious libellous allegations and I am now inviting you to take this bet. Are you a man or a mouse?
I'll contact the library next week and we'll soon find out the truth of your claims.
Cambridge doesn't take kindly to people pretending to have degrees for financial gain.
So are you taking the bet?
If so I can contact a solicitor and make arrangements for you to inspect my thesis
Cambridge University, PhD, Author - female, 1980-1989, interferon, humans, animals, cows, calves, route of administration - nebuliser.
It's possible to contact the university library directly and with this information the library staff should be able to narrow down the PhDs and provide a list.
“Enough people have stated that they remember you being caught in your own lies about using nebulisers when they hadn't yet been used by Dr. Tyrell”
This is what you stated. Are you accepting that I administered IFN by a nebuliser in the 1980s or taking the bet?
Man up tough guy
Your a numpty Sakura. You can't even express the correct charge laid against you. HInt: no one said anything about you using nebulisers or not. I can only guess that your PHD research was so awful that the University refused to Microfiche it into archives. I find that rather unsurprising as a possibility.