Scancell founder says the company is ready to commercialise novel medicines to counteract cancer. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
NRW update ? Up to 84 from 83 can’t open on phone
OT - I saw that also but nothing I can find - you can sort into date order so it could be an old e-mail that has been added as the latest is still the 28th Sep
Hi OHS there is a new update on NRW Dated 1/10 "Sch 5-2 Q3 (reagent consumption) and receipt of fileshare files.msg" but it is marked as confidential cant be opened
I can't see an update mate?
https://publicregister.naturalresources.wales/Search/Results?SearchTerm=+PAN-008534
top one/ details /related documents
can open now just general questions
I can’t see what you’re seeing OT? That link goes to the same page as the link I use and the latest update is 28/09 and 84 total searches still?
Dear Cara, Phil,
On our last call I mentioned line 32 of your materials inventory to clarify (historic fly ash accumulation total stored / storage volume) – apparent inconsistency. I’m now looking through at the projected reagent consumptions (with relation to BRef / BAT), and could I get you also to take a look at:
Line 21 – Urea – clarify if 2430 TPA is per unit or for two unit operation – column heading and line text inconsistent?
Line 35 – PAC – A couple of queries. Text refers to Lime usage not PAC. Figure of 40.5 kg/h /283-4 TPA/unit appears reasonable, but doesn’t seem to immediately correlate with planning and “2 unit” stated consumptions of 630 and 383 TPA. I think 630 TPA may be 90% Load factor corrected, but please clarify, I can’t see how 383 is arrived at.
Also Line 20 – (Nash STP) water. Quoted at 3,218,408 l/annum [= 3,218 m3/annum]. This seems very different from submission water balance diagram which indicated 366,488 m3 Nash water to cooling tower, 392,188m3 total with storm water. Please clarify. Exact figure not necessary, but order of magnitude is required. 3,218 m3 is less than W2 discharge arising which is inconsistent. If line 20 is actually m3, I then seem to be a factor of 10 too high compared to original water balance diagram)?
Given that I’ve looked at a limited number of line entries and have spotted several seeming inconsistencies, please could I ask you to review all parts, and resubmit? I’m not sure there’s consistency in presentation of data for 1 unit or two, and in application of a reducing load factor. If, on the other hand (as is possible) I’m misunderstanding the information sent, please accept my apologies, and clarify.
Also, I confirm apparent receipt of various larger files via fileshare. I’m having connection problems so as yet haven’t been able to download them all. But… They all appear to be there as sent, so should be Okay. I’ll recheck next week, and will let you know if there any issues.
Kind Regards
David
Dr David Poole
Dated 1/10/20
Be good to know what was in file share but cant open that
Dear David,
I’ve had a look through the tables you are questioning and have found some of the answers you are looking for. With ref to your query regarding Urea on Line 21 - if you scroll to the end of the column you will see a note that says, “Urea usage based on RJM projections ref. e-mail ....... per unit per year - so I would assume the answer is ‘per unit’. Regarding Line 35, could be a simple typo and meant to read 283, not 383 as the next 2 columns reference 283 tonnes per unit? As for Line 20 - I need to do some more research.
Regards,
OHS
Do you fancy a new career in South Wales OHS
Ha! Depends on the share scheme they do ;)
Started down but creeping up as we speak. Would be great to finish the week up. SP still very much undervalued IMHO.
Line 20: UPS have stated that the Secondary Treated Sewage Water that comes form Nash Sewage Treatment Plant (STP) is expected to be 3,218,408 litres (3,218m3) of treated water, which will be utilised in their cooling process.
"The W2 discharge is what discharges to the River Usk from Julian's Pill. Julian’s Pill itself is a heavily modified watercourse with little natural flow. The continuous nature of the flow is due to the permitted discharge from the STW."
Ref: file:///C:/Users/o_nei/Downloads/PAN-008534%20-%20Appendix%20G%20Environmental%20Risk%20Assessment%20%20v2r1%20191218%20(2).pdf
The Water Balance diagram details the TOTAL amount of on site water and its use. Surely the run off to the River Usk will naturally be much more than the volume of treated water that comes from Nash Sewage Works, especially taking into account annual rain fall in Wales?
Anyone else have a different opinion or explanation?
Cheers, OHS
The rest of this year or Q4 could be transformational for SAE Uskmouth project.
Looking forward to this unfolding.
Further PPA's, Environmental permit, EPC, planning in no specific order but all very much big milestones in progress.
Well that is those questions answered OHS very impressed of course they could also have a leaky tap
OT - Just thought I’d see how much you can actually find on google! Ha! Cara can just copy and paste from here now and then knock off early for the weekend :)
Its a refreshing change Phyl, to see lots of blue buys on the trades rather than the sea of red we saw mid week. Hopefully it will continue and provide further support to us and perhaps even finish blue like you say. OHS