Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Yes correct it was 2013 when i first started investing in shares. It's still fresh in my mind it feels like yesterday.
Looking back at 2013 i was very very naive Back then i remember thinking that investing in shares was a more respectable form of gambling.
I would read RNS's and watch interviews with the various CEOs and i was trustful and believed in what they were saying. Sometimes i would invest in a company and i felt so good when some fellow thread posters congratulated me on my investment.
Back in 2013 i would sometimes see posters who made negative remarks about a company or management. Even back then this didn't bother me because as long at what the CEO said came true then i was confident the share price would rise.
Then i noticed a pattern, what most CEOs said didn't come true. They also never resigned over failing to deliver. I had high expectations so this disappointed me.
Then it dawned on me, an huge number of AIM CEOs were crooked ścum of the earth indiviuals who had found a legal racket to fleece people. So then it became obvious why these grûbby inviduals never resigned over failure.
You are just as bad. You are the blue bottle fly of AIM, where ever their is śhit you will be hovering around telling people how wonderful it is. Śhareprophets article said you are an independant financial advisor who manages the portfolio of your clients. It blows my mind that individuals like you would be advising clients that companies like RRR are a good investment. You must be the low end of your profession.
Keep to your flimsy promise and never respond to any of my posts EVER again. CONMAN!!!
Https://twitter.com/DerGoldreport/status/1678008975365685250?s=20
Https://twitter.com/jczuleta/status/1678039545453879296?s=20
My last ever response to you Z.
I did have a look back at some of your postings back in 2013, interesting.
I note that your understanding of investing and commercial matters remains at near zero. I also note your previously stated enmity and hatred for Andrew Bell and Scott Kaintz. The hatred seems misplaced given your previously stated lack of knowledge and experience.
As I said, ALR is a business; it is not Tin Hill.
Tin Hill is one licence and one asset of ALR. In business things change and in ALR's case things have changed. ALR had multiple licence applications in the system and licences awaiting change of ownership registration. Some of those have been dealt with and some are still in the system. The new rules also change the business environment.
I am very happy with ALR and my holding is worth decent money. You however think I should take you seriously, the man who lost money on RGM and RRR, who has no current holding in RRR and no holding in ALR.
It would seem that your only asset is your continuing, irrational hatred of Andrew Bell and to much lower level Scott Kaintz.
Anyway, time for a walk in the sun; and get a life...etc
xx
DYOR
Helpful when the Tin hill 15th June RNS was released you was known as "loose lips Lundy" because within days Tin hill would be going into production and you were going into fine detail at the huge amount of money Tin hill would soon be raking in.🤑🤑🤑🤑🤑
Now a few weeks on you are saying Tin hill is not that important and you don't want talk about it. 🥴
H5O grow up.
I am not in cahoots with AB, I personally own 10%+ of ALR and with two mates we own 30%+.
ALR is a business, it is not just Tin Hill.
RRR does not control ALR it has less than 50%.
AB promised a presentation: I have not seen it or a draft. Anything they were going to say 2/3 weeks ago is out of date. ALR is now significantly larger than it was 2/3 weeks ago. Running one site out of the UK would be difficult enough but five would be too much. ALR now needs more local management: it now has four more sites where it needs more sampling, it needs the EMAPs, the EIAs and the EIA certificates. It needs a plan to operate the five sites.
The market marked up RRR about 80% a few weeks back off news on Tin Hill ie, it valued the news at about £4mil. The ALR news since is much greater and should be valued at more and we have more licence applications still in the pipeline.
In addition, the new rules open new opportunities.
In my view, Zimbabwe will gradually make the lithium market in Zim more regulated. Smaller operations or people inexperienced at operating in a regulated environment will want out in due course.
Again, in my view ALR is worth a multiple of RRR's MC. Anyway, you make your own choices and so on....
DYOR
Helpful you do write a load of rubbish about Glencore! They are not quaking in their feet about Red Rock and they will not be paying Red Rock any money.
Bell and you have said that in the past Glencore had discussions with Red Rock about the DRC asset. Nothing further happened. So nothing wrong with that.
Bell said that as soon as Gecamines bought the asset from VUP they instantly did a deal with Glencore.
If Gecamines had told Glencore that they would soon be the only holders of the DRC license and Glencore had replied that a deal could be quickly done if Gecamines ever became the sole license holders. Again nothing wrong with that.
29 April 2022 Half year report said:
"A partner wrongly in our view sold our assets for $20m to the parastatal from which they came"
So DRC state owned company Gecamines became the outright license owner when they bought the license from VUP.
From same RNS:
"We also believe we have a legitimate interest in the on-sale of those assets at a very large mark-up"
Well considering state owned Gecamines bought the license from Red Rock's partners VUP and then Gecamines managed to wipe Red Rock's name from the license. So when Gecamines became the outright license owners they near instantly sold it on at a considerable profit. So if RRR want to chase after anyone then it should be Gecamines. Certainly not Glencore!
Also this mess is at the end of the day is Andrew Bell's fault. For years DRC is in the bottom 10 worst countries in the world to do business. In the wall street journal list DRC is ranked 182 out of 190 countries. So when Bell ignored all this and decided to do business in the DRC, it was his gamble, his decision, if anything went subsequently wrong it would be his fault. So something subsequently went wrong and therefore bad judgement from Bell once again!
Sounds like many an AIM company.
Could potentially be a different company with a new man at the top to clear away the past indiscretions.
Lithium looks exciting but it seems everything Bell touches turns to 💩
H5O great post. Completely agree
As I have repeatedly said thf next RNS needs detailed plan and milestones for Tin Hill only.
It sounds too good to be true in terms of quotes so far. If we have a clear sensible plan on Tin Hill it will massively improve sentiment.
Helpful - that's balance and objectivity and I've would my neck in on Zimbabwe as promised. I really think this could be a game changer but Bell needs to avoid twitter telegram and talk to shareholders via RNS.
Sounds like another bad luck story Helpful but for our appalling luck we would have a $2bn asset rather than a tenuous $10m claim which is unlikely to reach fruition. And you would be 100 fold up on your advice rather than 15 fold down. And you accuse the bashers of living in the past :).
Bottom line is you have called RRR wrong for years and that you can't escape that.
New - trader a new poster !! My debate is not with you. For me the view that anyone who posts negatively somehow wants to get in cheaper is idiocy . No offence meant but that's the stuff of five year old (let alone Helpfuls teenage poster)
Some might want to get in cheaper for me I have time on my hands, detailed company knowledge, quite a few fellow posters who share my views and I'm keen no one else is sucked in by the ridiculous ramping that Bell solicits and encourages.
So no not here for a profit rather in the interests of balance objectivity and fair mindedness. Not everyone is motivated by money.
Helpful when I get kisses which you reserve for others I know I've hit a nerve :)
Says you at gone midnight. Lol
Wow all the helpful people trying to "save" us on how bad this company is. How they don't want us to lose money blah blah. They care about us so much that they even post on a weekend! I don't get it if you lot think this is a bad company say your piece and move on. If you've lost money previously on here then go on another and concentrate on that and make some money on there. It's so evident you lot just want a cheaper entry. You really have to question motivates on why someone who thinks a share isn't a good investment or neither holds any shares spends so much of their time on a shares chat forum.
Helpful I noticed you suggested that the Lithium presentation that Bell suggested would be available within 2 weeks (meaning next week) has now become out of date because RRR has received new licences and it might be delayed. One appreciates this is your wording and not Bell's but as you are in cahoots with Bell then one has to take your comment as a possibility.
If the presentation does not come for whatever reason then the market will be disappointed at the very least, there will be more negativity as the bears will labour on the fact that, one again, Bell fails to deliver his promises.
If this presentation has been aborted, albeit temporarily, then Bell needs to get out there and explain why in clear terms, the reasons might be deemed positive if clarity is offered up.
In my view I can see no reason why RRR cannot produce a presentation just for Tin Hill, Bell has indirectly stated that he expected Red Rock to receive annual free cash from Tin Hill IRO £3.75m backing up the numbers made by the geologist in December where he suggested RRR would receive $600,00 a month.
I notice that you have not refuted the offered up numbers from Tin Hill so I feel they must be fairly accurate as they come from Bell, the Geologist and you have not interjected.
To conclude Bell has not said the presentation has been delayed, if it has he needs to explain why either via a podcast or a general market project update via RNS, do not leave investors guessing.
Lets forget the detail, ie., anything that demonstrates you are talking out of your fundament.
Bottom line is that RRR was cheated. The amount involved is somewhere between $420mil x 50.1% and $3.5bil x 50.1% ($3.5bil being about the DCF number).
1620 Capital (John Boardman and Jason Brewer) introduced the deal: both 1620 and VUP got paid readdies, shares and warrants. RRR paid through the nose and then got shafted by the other side. All the share issues in the last three years were down to RRR getting shafted.
If RRR had been able to rely on its assets and its partners then everyone on here would be talking about how wonderful Andrew Bell was.
So, yes, lets forget details and talk nonsense about how AB is a bad guy because he doesn't listen to you.
Meanwhile, RRR has brought its third asset into production if not actually done it today, very shortly. If RRR had not been shafted then it would be RRR's fourth asset being brought into production.
In the meantime, I look forward to banking some serious money whilst you move on to some other company to bleat about and tell everyone that you are ever so important.
xx
DYOR
PS I fully expect Glencore will be paying us some serious readdies fairly soon.
TDT I am glad you have found your life's work, trolling on a company you don't hold shares in and never have held in. Quite possibly a whole new definition of futility and that is without mentioning you know nothing about the company and its assets.
Helpful let's forget detail and look at the bigger picture and the strategic.
- You have ramped this relentlessly and it's fallen in value 30 fold since you appeared. It may double tommorrow but you will still be out by a factor of 15.
- I have warned relentlessly all was not what it seems.
Who was right . You cost people you were advising a fortune I saved them.
Yes I did offer to wind my neck in re Zimbabwe which I have done. I'm waiting for Tin Hill only not the next licence. Tin Hill production sales 500k a month etc.
Based on performance and punditry - I think you should perhaps have a bit more contrition.
Never mind consol yourself with posting latest lithium or gold prices or how well others on adjacent plots have done.
Bottom line is RRR has performed terribly and you have been wrong at every juncture.
Let's hope you have called Tin Hill and DRC correct as your form reads FF/PU/F/0/0F.
Even money next RNS fund raise. But I would be delighted for you and holders if Tin Hill / DRC comes good. I will then wish you all well and my neck will be wound completely in. Until then I will constructively challenge.
Refuting the nonsense you post on here Helpful would be a full time career.
TDT
Banbury, yes.
And unlike the former bulls and trolls on here I have told AB to his face where he messed up; he wasn't happy but hey ho.
I have repeatedly refuted some of the nonsense you post on here, which you then just repost a few days later in a slightly different format. I remember a few weeks back after such an interaction you were going to wind your neck in but here you are, again.
Two big mistakes in my view where going back into Steelmin and the Amulet Diamond Corporation gig. Smaller mistakes that were fair bets were the Vector Resources gig (Jason Brewer, superhero much loved by some on here) and the Slovakian silver tailings gig.
If RRR hadn't been cheated by VUP, everything would have come up smelling of roses. My original reason for investing substantial amounts was the DRC tailings gig and followed on when we got Musonoi and the other two licences. I was aware of all of the other stuff but DRC was the upside. Except for VUP's actions, Musonoi would have had a JORC and been in production within 12 months. The judgement on DRC was correct and will be shown to be correct in due course.
AB and RRR just has to be sensitive to local sensibilities, play along and wait. We are nearly there and we inch forward slowly.
DYOR
Hi Helpful have you ever had or made a negative comment about anything RRR does. Non stop hyperbole and in the time you have been on the board Shareholder value has fallen 30 fold. So you have been wrong on every shout.
This post is a bit below the belt and I get you are limited on what you can say on ALR but to say
" I am very happy with where we are now on DRC" really sticks.
We have carried the "promise of DRC" for far too long as a "crutch" to lean on and excuse to such a degree one of the posters normally in your court H5O is questioning DRCs validity as a recoverable asset.
Good judgement is about balance proportionality lack of bias and objectivity whilst being mindful of risk. I think your comment I am happy with where we are in DRC is really poor judgement and most posters would concur. H5O is right to pose his rather skeptical and probing questions on DRC.
Fair play. I do hope for holders that you are correct in your assumptions. But people do need to be aware of the history of the board and the geo political issues in Africa especially the DRC
Not as worrying as your attention seeking teenager antics with nothing meaningful or useful to say.
To clear, I am very happy about we are right now in ALR and in DRC.
As always fingers crossed. Until it is done, it ain't done.
DYOR
Your fascination with teenagers is worrying.
Teenager, I am not in any Twitter/Telegram/other platform group for any share.
As I said, I wouldn't join a club that would have me.
xx
I wouldn’t be surprised if Helpless isn’t in the Telegram group with Aim terminator, Bel and the rest of the pump and dump squad. I’d be surprised if Bell isn’t setting up or has already done another fund raise, that’s how he operates.
Just looked over at the other board and to me at least it seems Andrews personal stock and the perception of him has never been lower.
Lots of unanswered questions on DRC and as Hawai says no public transcripts, dates evidence of any progress. Andrew I know you read this Board and postings. An independent report on recoverability of DRC might go a long way to address concerns.
In addition a quick publication of six or seven detailed milestones on Tin Hill [ no one is interested in Jam tommorrow licences] . Even your supporters accuse you of having far ro many plates spinning. Had you stopped plate spinning and just took the Jupiter revenue we would be multiples of where we are now. The Jupiter income was wasted and eventually the asset was sold to fund more "plates" that all crashed.
Even you most avid supporters suggest you should focus on Zimbabwe. My advice leave out Telegram and Twitter. Focus on communication through RNS or as you used to do news letters. Throw everything at Tin Hill and be honest about how we perform against published milestones