Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
VanV, I know that full well and I was talking specifically about you and that drive you did to push the government at the time. Just didn't want to mention you as last time I did you started talking about 'smoke' and 'jacksies'.
MS
Bit longer term but I'm looking at oncology diagnostics as being the main branch of nova business
I remember you been on to the media and government all the time in those days vanv. A valiant effort you made blowing NCYT’s trumpet .
Time well spent ;)
@Kaeren, good post. Again.
Your post part
"Roll on two years '"Mr Johnston why did you not utilise a British company that had the very product available , first to market that could assist "
************
You don not have to roll on two years.
Just look back 1 year. We had the tests then in January and we never got any/much mention/use then either.
And it's not like they didn't know about us and our tests. They were made very well aware of us and it.
Nope, they preferred to use the cheap, inaccurate imported junk.
Makes one wonder why that was. And is for that matter. It's incomprehensible.
MS
Taylorquant mentions moving into other areas of testing.
Transplant was one of the first steps. And look how vital a test is when having a transplant. And it would not just be one test
Clinical testing would protect margins and against competition as sometimes it is very difficult to enter. Oncology has been mentioned.
The DHSC has already shown that they want mass testing low margin or .rap tests
Hi Bluelight , in the current climate I haven't discounted anything yet. Boris's total u turn in his speech a few days back about the reduction in cases being attributable to lockdown and not vaccines is a precursor to something. We now have a very alarming situation with the S.A variant and the govt knows it could totally derail the vaccination rollout success thus far( and it is amazing) It is what he doesn't say that is worrying. Why the big u turn just as lockdown eases , he was full of vaccines fantastic all going according to plan blah blah. We k now we have the test that can assist it will be a crying shame and potentially yet again the loss of many lives if the govt does not act in the best interests of the people they govern. It to me will be outrageous to not utilise something that can assist , stop the nit picking over a clause in the contract or whatever the issue is and manage the situation on the ground and fast !!!
Roll on two years '"Mr Johnston why did you not utilise a British company that had the very product available , first to market that could assist "
" ERM clause 5.67 b stipulated that --- and we wanted to pursue this therefore we we we well we just ....
Unbelievable, couldnt make it up.
gazman123, not sure how old that is. i recall bladsharpe finding something
https://www.tendersinfo.com/tenders_details/456920354?desc=Supply-Of-Q16-And-Q32-Rapid-pcr-Instrument-Platforms-Exsig-Covid-19-Direct-Kits-And-Genesig-Sars-cov-2-Winterplex-Kits.
Agree, now looking at as a bonus. They seem fixed on cheap and nasty rather than quality.
Thanks , something like that coming to fruition would certainly lift spirits. I remain optimistic , this share like most on aim can be extremely volatile but it certainly has the product's that are in demand right now. Thanks for your continuing research.K
I don't know about anyone else but I've completely discounted any more central tenders completely. In my mind we simply wont get any, just the govs messing around. I imagine many people are of the same view. There is still obviously a good chance one comes out of the blue, in which case the share price will rocket as no one expects it. It will be an interesting day if one does land for sure.
I've just stumbled across this but can't find any further info...https://www.globaltenders.com/gt-search?keyword%5B%5D=genesig