Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Confirmed - Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz..............
I guess you just lack the minerals
Just to say that comedy itself has gone in a weird direction.
People seem to be really into ironic comedy, fakeness and cleverness.
Troublesome - do you think it odd that the ticks would be adjusted overnight or not or is this beyond your range of 'critical thinking'? I guess "lol" will suffice.
I was being ironic. I'm sure the phrase rings a bell with some. Even you could probably find it with some research.
If you think I have BT on a pedestal you are, as you are with most things, mistaken. It's just that for me he's not failing.
Brian (joke) Lol
@NGR
Rather predictable spiel that NGR but don't see an explanation for your 'its been emotional '.
Any ideas who or what that was caused by - I'd have thought too high expectations and excitement engendered by members of the Board, especially the beloved Brian might have played a major part. But of course, I assume you'd find that acceptable, I assume, as part of his 'game of bluff' with Samsung that has been mentioned previously.
HH I took a screen shot at 21:41 of your post you made at 20:42 re your "deceitful CEO comment" and sent it to my mate Brian (joke)
You had 17 ticks at the time. This morning only 6. Very Odd.
Troublesome, in my opinion, the more naysayers that sell up and leave; the better for Nanoco long-term. Nanoco is undervalued for a reason. The sentiment here is toxic.
Potential new investors will likely be persuaded not to invest. We need new investors to increase the share price - the catalyst might be news, but absent of that negativity won't help.
Anyone unhappy with the board performance, hoping to exit at a higher price should have taken up the tender offer and sell out, or leave now at 21.5p while they can if they missed the tender deadline - because the SP will drop shortly.
Essentially I hope and recommend every single litigation coat-tail surfer leaves, or stops criticising past events. I've decided to trust that the company will continue to deliver as per guidance, precisely as they have been. Until they mis I see no reason to change tactics.
Blaming the board, the funders, the advisors, LOAM, RG, Edison, TP and anyone else 'you' associate with the settlement for the outcome is avoiding self responsibility and instead suggesting every afore mentioned party was, or is complicit in fraud.
Remaining here and continuing to voice 'your perceived mis-trust' in the board will unlikely bear fruit for anyone.
Two major inflection points …yes Tenner it truly was a major inflection point south.
@Troublesome: The CEO has systematically misled investors prior to his capitulation to Samsung. Communication post capitulation to Samsung showed the contempt BT has for investors.
No thanks anyone still believing in the CEO needs his head examined.
Why should anyone want a whole load of people to invest elsewhere ?
Is this company so bad !
What's been emotional ?
Hopefully your 17 supporters all follow suit HH! Good luck elsewhere, it’s been emotional!
Echoing that HenryHistorian, hoping full holding taken. I figure it will naturally drift down again once they've completed the buyback. With the soon to be reduced cash balance, minimal revenue, the long jam tomorrow story and this management's track record it wasn't a difficult decision.
I tendered - I cannot be bothered any longer with a deceitful CEO, a piece of….
Ok, maybe your right, but settlement date is the actual date you go on the register. But CBA
“ Record date should normally be a Friday, therefore with standard settlement of T+2, the associated Ex date falls one business day earlier.”
I think you are wrong ..if you sold your shares today you could not participate in the tender , the buyer would technically have the right . The day a share goes ex an entitlement is not three days before the ex date it is the day. So say you bought shares the day before a share goes they ex dividend ..the dividend is yours. Dont confuse trade date and settlement date. The entitlement goes with the trade date not the settlement date.
Kooba, it will be interesting once the outcome of the tender is known. However all trades allowing to participate has already passed as the record date is today which means last trades to “entitlement to participate” would have been Friday the 5th as settlement date for those trades would be today thus entered on to the register.
Unless I misunderstood your post.
I did tender just under 38%, the 55,000 shares I purchased in tranches after the so called settlement or sale of IP or license agreement, what ever it was!
I didn’t vote and I’ve always got an axe to grind !! And to be honest what Loam do has a bearing on things far more than a few smaller holders. It’s clear that a number of pi’s are not participating and some directors aren’t so it’s possible tendering over the 38.5% will see a higher level of acceptance…maybe getting over 50% sold at 24p if you tender the whole holding?
Will be interesting how they trade tomorrow once the entitlement to participate is over.
Who are you referring to ddub? I hope you're not lowering yourself to the same accusations others have made?
Possibly not. Did you complete it Nigel?
I suspect the poll is not representative…..people with an axe to grind are often the most vocal
Thanks Mr N. Consistent results then and now, even if based on limited data.
If those results are representative, it does not look like too many will be tendering.
Who knows T, some might not give an honest answer but truthful old me voted the same way twice - 0% tendered.
Interestingly we are up nearly 5% this morning (so far) so the gap is narrowing.
I am living in hope of unexpected and good news that blows the current ceiling off the SP. Wake me up in 18 months🤣