We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
A E M
Years ago there was a TV show with - I think Enfield with a side kick Tim.
He was always referred to as bright but dim.
Bit like EU rules on light bulbs - were bright - banned - can't find me glasses now?
""Tim was the bright but dim boy -""
How can you be "bright....... but dim"?
Are you confusing this with, "nice but dim"?
JR
Are u totally LULU?
J15006.A broken bulb is brighter than you.lol..........................................
Sorry tricky
That was Wee Bernie
Tim was the bright but dim boy - probably brighter than many of the labour MPs in HOC - always remembering that there was an education system at the time of Tim bright but dim.
I think he could be a Sheila.
Nope, can't buy experience JL no amount of vociferousness will compensate.
You have made no sensible valid points that you hoped to make. The rubbish you are droning on about has nothing to do with Lloyds Brexit or business. Nite nite plonker.
Sad to see that the Japan PM has no vision - since he fully endorses Treason Mays no deal death trap.
Shows what you can do with interpreters!
Tricky
looks like a right ding dong today( CC LT etc). Harking back to Harry Enfields mate - bright but dim - puts some of these snowflakes to shame.
What a future with these wizards around.
Please to see the gradual SP uplift. Much more is warranted - of course.
LTI he doesn't read anything he can't oppose or requires him to question his position cos he's at that age when he's just contradicts everything & he's not that bovvered cos he's on his playstation anyway.
Second referendum odds lengthening markedly now nearly 2/1!! Hilarious, C4 news have a debate with young uns expecting them to all be remainers but they all want to leave ha ha ha they can't even get that right!
JFCC
It is only you that gets confused.
I am not going to repeat my posts again
I recommend you re-read the posts again. It may take a few reads for you.
Maybe just maybe things will start to penetrate your mind more clearly
Nothing. You implied I had likely not kept my shares using that weird logic. But you have no clue either the mind sets of all those who sold or indded what percent did sell. You have turned ocd into an hobby. Can you actually remember your point? It was you who started this chain of 'logic'
JFCC
''Agreed. So what were you trying to prove again?''
You are a very very confused person. Do you not remember, I wasn't trying to prove anything. It was you who said that I was trying to prove something wasn't it?. Do you remember now?
JFCC
''Agreed''
So you are agreeing about the sell off. So what has the sell off got to do with whether you have shares or not?
JFCC
''All by attempting to prove I have no Lloyds shares.''
proving that you have no shares (never bought?) .
Just now it was proving that you have sold your shares.
I refer you to my post at 19.00
"How on earth can someone prove that a poster has bought or sold Lloyds shares?" Agreed. So what were you trying to prove again?
"The share has been sold off due to Brexit worries" Agreed. I knew you would get there in the end. All by attempting to prove I have no Lloyds shares. Astonishing intuitive leaps LTI. Well done.
JFCC
re 18.53
you are cracking up
JFCC
''guesses about institutional investors''
If the share price plummets from 73p to under 50p in a relatively short period of time, then I would think that most people would be guessing the same. The share has been sold off due to Brexit worries.
What is your guess as to why the share price dropped so much?
JFCC
''to prove I sold my shares at a certain point''
You have a strange illogical mind.
You have just revealed that you have Lloyds shares, I am not trying 'to prove' that you have sold them.
Do you realise the stupidity of your comment. How on earth can someone prove that a poster has bought or sold Lloyds shares?
Who is "we" and how do you know what all of "them" think and how do all those imaginary people know my reasons for doing something? Why else did I join at that specific moment and not any of the rest of the time? What is wrong with you ? And what do you think your crazy obsessions tell you?
LTI You seem to think your guesses about institutional investors, their mindsets and their share trading based on nothing but guesswork to prove I sold my shares at a certain point. Are you barking mad?
JFCC
If I were guessing then I would say that the majority of Lloyds shares held were with financial institutions who were concerned with the UK leaving the EU, hence the sell off with the share price going to below 50p
JFCC
''its a reasonable statistical assumption ''
Your illogical thoughts are astounding.
A reasonable assumption that the number of Lloyds shares held by people and financial institutions who support EU membership totals 48%,mirroring the referendum?
You are good for a laugh