Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
messages crossed...
thanks lads, makes sense now.....well, a bit more sense..;)
So they would mine and not know the full extent of the resource?
Bit of a novice in this im afraid..
If so, we wouldn't necessarily know what we (GGp) have?..how would that effect the sp?
VC, read chartbuster's last post about the rumours his mates had heard about fan out drilling from existing pads.
MS
VC, personally I think they probably have split the rigs now so some are completing the infill drilling and the rest are testing depth and edges.
The ones in the NW are probably testing the depth at the moment and may continue with the step-outs later.
I think NCM will be under pressure to get enough drilling done to complete the MRE later in the year
Based on what SB said in his last update I’m not sure we can rely on paddysat regarding step outs.
I’m wondering if NC have changed Tack to only target the high grade zones so as to mine ASAP.
They can then drill further out at their leisure.
That’s not to say they aren’t still hitting mineralisation it’s just that SB commented on possibilities to get to mine quicker in the Q&A session.
Just a quick question to Paddy or anyone else who can impart some knowledge..
In the last sat pics...no further step out rigs were noted...
Would we of expected more action in the NW considering that is where its 'open and at depth..'?
Does this impact Paddys theory regarding the 'DOME' hypothesis …
VC
The problem people considering investing in our neighbour to the North is that that companies utilisation of apparent artistic license when drafting graphics to promote the potential for our Haverion find to be heading in the direction of their license.
As can be clearly witnessed from the link that PG put up https://stockhead.com.au/resources/gold-next-quarter-artemis-will-be-drilling-for-its-very-own-havieron/
that in our Haverion model the Haverion fault direction traverses through our Haverion license in a West North West heading.
However, it is apparent from our neighbours graphic that they had a slip of the pen, and their perception of the Haverion fault heading is now in a North North West direction.
I suppose what potential investors in our neighbour should ask themselves are:
1) Who is more likely to have the greater knowledge of the fault line heading, those whose license the fault has been “proven” to traverse through and whose license name the fault has been named after, or those who have no direct knowledge of the perceived fault heading and merely live in hope that the heading leads to it traversing into their license.
2) Were the fault heading indeed to be in the direction promoted by the company through the license that it was identified in and after which the fault has been named, then a rough rule of thumb process when viewing the graphics would indicate that the fault may not traverse through the neighbours license at all (other than perhaps clipping the very boundary of that license, if they are even that lucky).
3) Would it benefit the neighbouring license holder to Haverion to have had a slip of the pen when generating their graphic, altering the heading direction of the fault so that it now traversed into their license, even though that was contrary to the heading of the fault from the Haverion license holder who clearly has greater knowledge of the fault gained through experience ?
All IMHO you understand.
I think many folk here and elsewhere on AIM have issues sitting & holding profits on their AIM investments... myself included!
Casting your eye around, it's always tempting to dive into the next hot share to compound those profits as the heat goes out of the one you're already invested in.
Sadly - in more cases than not - it is "usually" safer to sit tight and wait for the heat to return, rather than chase rainbows elsewhere...
...and I cannot - for the life in me - currently see a better or safer medium term profitable prospect on AIM than GGP.
Looking forward to news and expecting it to arrive perhaps a whole lot faster than many think... would you really want to be sitting it out on the sidelines when this really takes off?
GL A & have agreat weekend :-)
I am not ramping. If you find my posts irritating I suggest you block me.
Other well informed posters such as Paddy recognise the relevance between ARV and GGP. The geology of the area surrounding Havieron does interest a few people.
Good luck to ARV but I won't be buying any Arnie - they may or may not get lucky but we're already 2 years further down the line at Havieron and 6 months or more down the line at Scallywag so why???
ATB Paddy
Arniebb - have you looked at the title of this particular thread?
Hi Paddy - good comments.
It is more ‘nearology’ than geology at the moment but if they do strike high grades Artemis will be a multi bagger. I am up 13% on ARV.
https://stockhead.com.au/resources/gold-next-quarter-artemis-will-be-drilling-for-its-very-own-havieron/
I think that Artemis are trying hard to drum up interest on the back of the GGP / NCM success at Havieron and I guess who can blame them - if the shoe was on the other foot then I'm sure we would be employing the same tactics.
Have a look at the two diagrams in this report on Stockhead though - I think the red line on the Artemis diagram is a little more NS than the one on the NCM diagram - can't blame them for trying though.
ATB - Paddy
I am already discussing on Hot Copper. What is your problem?
I think there is high grade gold in the Artemis area adjoining north side of Havieron.
It does not matter what kind of management runs Artemis, Newcrest will want the northern extension to the future Havieron gold mine.
Add to that list of Australian crooks Chris Fraser.
how the fook are some of you creating a problem out of something that cant even happen. DL has nothing to do with Artemis, he has absolutely nothing to do with GGP. best he can do is make comments
its very strange.
LOL. That's very good if a tad macabre !
Devil and the deep blue sea. Headed or beheaded. Lol
Lenigas is no longer at Artemis. he left last year. The company's now headed by a Saudi prince
I was under the impression that Lenigas had left(Artemis)? Or is he back.
Mapp you should get on well together lol
have you looked at the magnetic maps.....probably not
We have the gold they are just looking for it!
Have we not been screwed? by losing any land adjacent to where we are looking for gold. our neighbours could find more/better and that wouldn't be so good for us would it???
Forgive me for sounding so pessimistic, but it is how i am.
5p.