We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Am I being unreasonable in expecting the company to give Shareholders an approximate timescale for the investigation to be completed? Investigations over the years have ranged from a few days to 2 or 3 years. As I said, an approximate timescale is not asking too much. Shareholders can then choose whether to buy, sell or hold our Shares. After all, we are the "customer".
Oppenheimer does have a clear agenda with statements suggesting that bagel land is around the corner. Whilst this is not completely out the picture, i don't think this is possible if callum is reinstated in the near future. In fact it will be interesting to see how far the SP jumps if he comes back soon. Despite the negativity/speculation surrounding Chill Brands, i remain very bullish for the year end. Will be increasing my skin in the game quite soon.
Unfortunately with some of Oppenheimer statements especially inhis last statement does have some bearing.
If a supplier is involved in negative activities, such as accusations of insider trading, the supermarket will conduct thorough due diligence to determine if the supplier poses a liability to their brand, and if so, they will terminate the relationship. However, seeking revenge in this manner seems poorly planned.
And furthermore, nobody here is bothered about YOU !!
I'm not bothered about Callum or Trevor or Roger or Bart being reinstated.
The issue is NONE of us know what they were doing to warrant these actions. Were they shorting? Were they lying? Were pumping?
Nobody knows anything.
On top of that you have massive brands like Morrisons who will be brought negatively down for conducting business with a potentially fraudulent group of leaders.
On top of that we have no idea how what they did has impacted sales or the numbers.
This is going down to the ground. No doubt about it. Restoring credibility is not an overnight thing.
Being back Callum doesn't do nothing Until it's is made clear what these leaders did and how it impacted the company
Everyone can see your agenda Opi.
I do hope you get caught out by a surprise RNS informing us that Trevor and Antonio are leaving and Callum is reinstated.
Michael Jackson is dead
Great investigation, only 4 days late đ were you on a ban opi
Https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/00b861c9-3076-4298-ad42-9299f2b564e9?shareToken=c563316bb06d6d06622c226ee77117cc
1p when the next RNS hits
Thanks, hopefully very soon
There is no IF on the GM it will be a when.
Thanks, if we can get that GM arranged, Swannâs vote approved and Callum back in, this could absolutely fly
I would imagine the GM called will be soon
Hard to say... I suppose the situation could take a while to resolve. The market seems to be in a holding pattern though...
Agree Bellers, Swanns' interests are very much aligned with ours which is why I am confident shareholders will be happy with the outcome. Callum will be back, it's just a matter of time.
Anyone have an idea on timescales for this fiasco being resolved or could it rumble on for months?
Iâm hoping Mr Swanns 68 million shares has helped him âsuggestâ who we put in as directors. He has 68 million reasons to get it correct. The good news is he has a definite vested interest in getting it right. The main thing for me is having Callum in to drive it forwards.
Agree with you buysellfred but sometimes you need to take immediate action and get rid of hostile, incompetent individuals before the virus spreads. While they stay the SP is only going to be going in one direction. I do agree that they need to be replaced by the correct people, but unfortunately we do not have the luxury of time.
Well aware of that....
the point is nobody knows of them..barely...
and what exactly will they bring to the table ??
it is ok just saying get rid of AR and TT...WE need a say in who to bring in too...not just a kneejerk reaction.
This is playing into the hands of a CHEAP hostile takeover.
Buysellfred, there is a high chance the two unknowns will refrain from running the business into bagel land like Russo and Taylor are doing. At this rate, us investors are just waiting for the dead cat to bounce if they remain on the board.
Aditya was non exec at aiq. Duncan stepped down and went onto âother thingsâ.
Now they both seem set to be back together at Chill if all Swanns needs and want get voted for. So, 2 old colleagues back together by the invitation of Swann. Looks like a thickening plot to me.
As that RNS relating to AIQ was from 6 October 2022 I don't see how it has any relevance to the Chill.
It does feel though as though as if there is a struggle going on for control of Chill. It may be that Mr Swann converted his loan into shares in order to put himself in a position to requisition a general meeting. Whatever the case, as he is now a significant shareholder it is clearly in his best interests to see the share price head north. He must see great potential for the business or else he would not have invested so much. All this uncertainty is unsettling but the fact that folk are fighting over control of Chill suggests they think it is worth fighting for. I continue to hold.
Can you explain Bellers ?
Change
AIQ Limited (LSE: AIQ) announces that, with immediate effect, Graham Duncan is stepping down from the Board of AIQ to pursue other interests and Aditya Chathli, who has been a Non-Executive Director of the Company since January 2018, has assumed the role of Chairman. The Company also announces the appointment of Dwight Mighty as a Non-Executive Director, also with immediate effect.
Two old colleagues will be back together. The plot thickens.
Then I assume "someone" at head orifice will be making an unbiased statement, introducing said "as yet unknowns and their histories in vape sales" so we can vote on them. Last things we need are 2 clowns out, 2 clowns in....and Callum banging his head against the wall and departing...
This goes a lot deeper than most think ...
imo..