Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Came back in yesterday. Now funded. So sit tight and see what happens. But I feel the updates will start flowing soon Gla.
Markets anticipate.
To date, ANGS has been an exception. Personally, am not expecting it to remain an exception much longer.
That is for each investor to judge for him/her-self.
Fair point Croqman
We await EA permit.
Nearly 40-50m shares forward sold last few weeks.
Placement holders knew weeks back in my opinion hence the constant 1.5m sells littering from 1p levels.
Onwards...
"At some stage, the market will change its perspective"
Lost track of how many months we have been hearing this on here. Or is it years now?
This will only be revalued upon actual demonstrative progress on site, followed by delivery to the levels expected
Why doesn't the Greenbox Brigade simply do one?
We know Environment Agency permit is CRITICAL.
Let's see, it was a variation and they typically take 4 months.
Todays UT if there is no follow through volume tomorrow was cheeky sods.
Maybe the next hurdle is one that someone as positive as you would not expect. You post 'will' when you should use 'might'.
At some stage, the market will change its perspective, be less concerned about the next hurdle to be negotiated and come to the conclusion that, on the basis of what has already been achieved, ANGS is undervalued.
Yanis
This is the attitude I've much enjoyed reading as I accumulated over most the year.
EA approval is the make or break.
There was a funding gap for addressing EA permit queries.
EA need to evaluate and out this perspective against high gas prices....
We need this onshore project
Today's UT smacks of selling desperation and we know most share prices drop below placing price... But GDR ZPHR HZM are my test cases to remain very positive.
Yanis, I think the more important question would have been...
Why did it take George so incredibly long to let the market know about schedule slippages? ANGS simply had to have been aware of them for weeks.
Yes, there are always external factors outsider a company's remit to influence that can come into play. However what ANGS has always had total control over is transparency - and it's really done itself no favours at all by clearly choosing not to be so.
But hey, who knows... maybe this time they've finally learned their lesson? I personally doubt it, but one can but hope.
Anyhow, much more importantly... how much gas and by when?
Analysing the situation a bit more, looks to me as the most important milestone that needs to met in order to achieve 1st gas in Q1 is in fact EA approval.
Very doubtful that Civil Works will kick in without it. Also, upon EA approval it is possible that Angus once they overcome this hurdle will seriously ramp up site activity and expediting of equipment delivery.
I think this is the reason that they come across as vague and delivery deadlines slip. Nobody needs to tell them that the earlier we get 1st gas the more money they will make before the hedge kicks in. They know this, and probably are frustrated as much as we do. Ofcourse nobody has control of EA, they will come up with a decision when they do. Cannot rush them.
It is possible that Angus revised delivery dates as a result of discussions with the EA. It may not be all that bad.
Fingers crossed for EA approval before Christmas.
Oktane. Posters arn't allowed to give share tips but they can have an opinion, if newbies haven't got the sense and own judgement they shouldn't invest.
WG. yes i know about the question and i'm wondering if news is due about the subject, all other Q&As have been published and answered. Did you get your questions published or not.
Anyone else noticed ED has stopped bragging about his most recent buy he was so proud of at 0.82, if it was real it is a real mark to market loss of 20%.
Newbies take care in following any trading tips on any shares BB.
Really because only yesterday you complained they haven’t answered yours!!! ……again your history is available to all!
Oh and ED? None of those of a more cautious persuasion about ANGS are a "cabal" of paid short sellers acting in concert with locals. That assertion is beyond deranged.
Far more likely is that there are those being paid to promote the stock - they're easily spottable - they are always careful to select a "strong buy" opinion. Most genuine posters don't bother.
As to why you're finding ADVFBN quieter? That's because, having spammed every single ANGS thread over there (and plenty of other ones too) with ramptastic copy n pastes under several of your multi-IDs (UltimateJustice9, 3Put, Solo4Yous and DaveMarn being particular faves of yours), you've now decided to just spam in your own echo chamber thread. Well done. Long may it continue.
WG. I havn't had a problem getting my questions answered, if you are polite and it doesn't require an RNS there shouldn't be an issue IMO.
You do realise that if you click on your name your history is available for all to read don't you BV?
For your advice to be taken seriously I should do a Cudd and start another new handle if I were you!
There are two important milestones to achieve 1st gas Q1 (2nd half of March with current delivery schedule):
(1) EA approval obtained this month. I think the reasons the Civil Works have not been awarded yet is because they are waiting for the approval (WG mentioned this earlier and I agree with it) - possibility of EA asking for alterations to the site. So obtaining approval first makes sense. Fingers crossed it arrives as expected. WG818, is right in that it will save a lot of time if packages were delivered and offloaded straight on to the foundations. But still, 1st gas Q1 can be met as long as delivery for rest of the equipment does not slip. Delivered equipment will be offloaded on to a lay down area and then moved on to their foundations after they are build.
(2) No slip in delivery schedule stated in last RNS.
If (1) and (2) are met then we should get 1st gas on the grid in the 2nd half of March. Fingers crossed.
As I've said before, I have paid for my right to comment on ANGS (not that I needed to, but still). Unlike so many I have nothing to hide... many of the cheerleaders here should try that... it's so damn relaxing not having to keep a track of all the previous porkies one's told under multiple IDs).
I note a couple more bits of equipment have turned up, which can only be a good thing. I still think that first gas within Q1, what with the numerous (and all apparently unforeseen) slippages, is staggeringly unlikely.
However, as some may recall having heard before, this all and solely remains about...
"How much gas and by when?"
WG . I see two sides of an argument good or bad. Just for the record i don't trade my shares but if you want your money back perminent negative posts isn't the answer. I want all holders to make a profit eventually given the tme taken out of their life.
I'd like. 50% uplift like PAT post placing
So not invested yet happy to spend their valuable time here dissing a company they have no real interest to see succeed.
Cabal of local short sellers and angry environmentalists more like.
Ech . you only have to ask them 3 words= Are you invested. Only HITS was honest to answer NO so i'll give him that, the rest have no balls to man up.
And as for asking questions on the Q&A! I have and they ignored them!