Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Oh this is tricky Northface (or is that two-faced?) - believe your assessment as coming from someone who has unknown true oil mining experience or believe our MD Ashley Gilbert who posted this in an RNS dated 15th April 24: -
"Having now successfully demonstrated light oil flow from two reservoirs at Hickory-1 in recent weeks, it is clear that this is a significant milestone in the history of 88 Energy. The USFS success represents the first time that we have successfully flowed oil to surface in Alaska - and under natural flow - as well as being the first time we have confirmed a light oil discovery of substantial scale in close proximity to the critical Dalton Highway and Trans-Alaskan Pipeline System infrastructure. To then achieve a second successful flow of light oil from the SMD-B reservoir, with a low gas/oil ratio, is an outstanding outcome for 88 Energy and its shareholders.
The flowing of light oil from multiple reservoirs demonstrates the potential that this acreage holds for our shareholders, positioning the Company to grow and extract value from Project Phoenix via multiple potential development and commercialisation pathways.”
- tricky decision but you know what, I’m going to side with the known professional Ashley Gilbert and put you in the greenbin - I know I must be mad, right???
I too am glad Jaffa decided to share his wisdom, especially as English is obviously his second language. I'm sure once we peel away that outer layer Jaffa will be seen in his true colour.
Looking forward to the analysis ;)
Thanks for sharing that, what a good citizen you are, no interest in the stock, yet you are here day after day, what a trooper :-)
I said it would be a total fluke if theses hit anything apart from dust.. dreadful share that never ever gives, always take and make u poor. It's a sham from top to bottom
Poor flow results
To be fair Older, there were two sides infiltrating this board and both have mainly evaporated. Neither belonged and neither were welcome. I know you were added by a few on here as a deramper and I may have agreed but for the fact you did educate without belittling, unlike Scot who was a narcissist who did not hide the fact that PANR was his baby and nothing was better. Many spoke about his mental health and overbearing posts which often exceeded the word max but all I could see was a god like complex thinking that he was helping people and I truly believe he actually thought he was, hence the mental comments from others. I hope he finds peace now that he has stopped writing chapters of his self obsessed book on here.
I have to say it is nice not to have to read through pages of posts of nonsense, mainly from derampers, but strangely miss the interaction when some just could not help themselves and had to comment with little thought of the consequences.
Maybe now that both 88E and PANR are struggling share price wise we can all enjoy the peace and quiet, at least until one finds a partner.....
Triump1
The jury is not still out, the verdict is in and is clear
Olderwiser and Scot are not the same person, you really should apologize, for your error at this stage.
Also clear you were in for the annual fleecing of the gullible, not a long term investor, thanks to Brom for pointing this out, and his adjudication on the multiple account false accusation
I will now modify my last point
"Posters like yourself, take the cake, your investment has been a disaster,"
To
Posters like yourself, take the cake, the investment has been a disaster, for those that followed the pumpers agenda
Worth noting the pumpers have now mostly evaporated like an early morning mist, only a month or two ago investors could not see the ground beneath their feet, on account of the sheer volume of misinformation swirling in front of their eyes.
Do you ever feel remorse for those who you always new would be losing here ?
hi scot..oops olderwiser i meant.
well we werent exactly expecting you to admit it now were we. wasnt it you that was accusing another poster over on panr of being a reincarnate poster, based on the single anecdotal evidence of "similar writing style"? now now, lets not be a hypocrite. there is far more evidence to believe you two are the same. your posting style, format, the fact that you post at the same time, disappear and then reappear in tandem, you only comment on the same boards, roughly in the same proportion. anyone with a scrap of nuance would be highly suspicious.
ahh and on the subject of judgement, and your very poor one regarding the flare photo and your investment into panr, which lets face it has been just as disasterous as here. you would know all about poor judgment. and now you can add lack of research to your ****nal of misinformation and poor judgement. seems another pattern is emerging.
its clear for all to see, i have never invested in 88e, but only traded it. my intentions were crystal clear for all to see from the very beginning; i even commented that i was here to purely trade into flow results. and very susessfully traded may i add. go take a look before making silly inaccurate conclusions and smearing other posters with lies! have you not learnt your lesson yet, or do you need yet another poster to show you the error of your ways like brombarb just has? and you expect people to respect your judgement?? you are very funny.
i am willing to take brombarbs comment into consideration however. this poster has been here longer than all of us, so if this poster doesnt believe you are the same person, then perhaps the jury is still out on this one.
you see, i can actually take others thoughts into consideration. another thing you and scot have in common; a completely unjustified arrogance and the deep rooted belief that you know better. go log in and take a look at your stock account...the big red number on the top page. theres your reality check!
when scot was asked by another poster to post panr losses compared his gains in trading, predictably there was silence. scot didnt manage to get back to them on that one. so i will now extend the same courtesy to you. do you fancy doing what your alter ego couldnt do? lets see whos judgement has more value for all to see shall we? because money talks, the rest is just bs.
18:53
I do not believe that Olderwiser and Scot126 are one and the same.
However is your last paragraph fact regarding triumph-1's investment here?
Certainly at odds with his claim
" Full disclosure: I sold on results day at 0.405 as that was always my strategy here from the get go."
Based on his posting history bought in during February at a lower price.
So if above accurate no loss rather a gain.
Triumph1
What foolishness is this
I am not Scot, this is well known, ask Brombarb
I live in the South pacific zone, first started posting on Hotcopper, as an 88e holder in 2015
Yes I did learn to use Part 1 and 2 from observing Scots posts, as it puts posts that exceed the word limit in the correct order for the reader, brilliant eh
The evidence is truly underwhelming, as the conclusion is entirely incorrect
Posters like yourself, take the cake, your investment has been a disaster, you were gifted all the information you needed to avoid the loss, and you think people should still respect your judgment
16:03
US$10B is just the pipeline (probably end up more) and you have to wonder if a stand alone pipeline would work in any case, they need a gas treatment plant in Prudhoe and LNG Facility at the end of the pipeline so they can distribute, export the gas etc.
Not just money Brombarb, they need the equivalent of the GDP of Kosovo. Not going to happen at over $10B cost.
16:03
I am just giving the facts :-)
It would be good for the North Slope in general itf it were to happen but to listen to some you would imagine that the pipeline construction was a guaranteed thing, yes ADGC are getting desperate and speaking to prospective suppliers etc to show they are doing something but they still have no money to build the pipeline.
Remember all, Scot126 and Olderwiser is the same person! Both reappeared at the same time again. One posting here, the other on PANR. Only these 2 posters start posts by writing "part 1, part 2". This poster logged into the wrong account over on PANR this morning haha. All the hallmarks of a Scot126 post, posted as the alter ego Olderwiser. Both only post on 88E and PANR, in roughly the same proportion! The evidence is overwhelming.
This poster has been well and truly rumbled. Reported to Admin for operating duplicate accounts!
I agree, by next year it will be a memory, and PANR gas will be back to being a liability. Shame as it is apparently good quality gas with low CO2 ;)
You’ve got him taped 5laws - laughable!!
Scot, I actually read one of your posts and nothing you have said is factual? Are you using ChatGPT to try any make yourself seem smart?
Plus you are writing under two aliases! Not cool dude!
How’s PANR doing?
11:42
HL have always confirmed voting activity has happened so I trust it does :-)
13:21
Not so sure how positive that is, pipeline depends on private capital which is yet to found despite years of trying to sell this project, seems like the whole project is running out of time.
https://www.adn.com/business-economy/energy/2024/05/01/alaska-gas-line-leaders-ask-lawmakers-to-support-giving-44b-project-until-years-end-to-succeed-or-die/
:-)
https://x.com/flight_useful/status/1786354738130309209?s=46&t=c4s50NWXswiWg9BVziGoag
Thanks Brombarb, contacted my broker who sent encrypted email which I replied to with voting instruction as per request. It said they would vote for me.
I have no idea if they will or how they will vote so not a great service imo
- underestimate big oilers will and ability to use all sorts of strategies to pick up resources on the cheap ( cough - market manipulation ???).
Wish they’d take the dug for a long walk on a short pier lol 😜 it’s a exploration company not a producer they’ve found oil and I’m sure there’s activity behind closed doors await and see what un folds all this war and peace conspiracies crap 💩
Blah, blah and more blah, likes the sound of his own voice while saying so little :-)
1/5 @ 10:55
Hi jaffas - agreed ref. director lifestyles. I continue to be flummoxed by the passivity displayed by practically all forum members when it comes to 88E management's refusal to invest a single Aussie dollar in any fundraise since Ashley Gilbert became MD in H1'21 [apart from Dr Staley, but small absolute dollar investment]. It's all the more puzzling because so many forum members find it remarkably easy to post all sorts of flowery invective at olderwiser and me!!
I wholeheartedly agree with you that 88E is not going to be in a position to drill an exploration or appraisal well for the foreseeable future. In fact, I suggest 88E has drilled its last well in Alaska as an operator. I'd go further and suggest that unless Leonis attracts an external partner within the next 4 months, any drilling on 88E's Alaskan acreage will not occur until January '26 at the very, very earliest. For those E&P investors looking for a big impact event to act as a catalyst for the 88E SP, then I fear they are in for a very long wait indeed. And, no, drilling two new production wells in Texas doesn't count!!
There are some on this forum who appear content that the company has raised sufficient capital to keep themselves going for the next 12 months or so. Ok, fine. Let's say the two new wells in Texas deliver on management guidance such that 88E exits CY'24 anticipating a net annual dividend of US$3m from Texas. Forgetting for now the likelihood 88E will have had to use the debt facility to drill the two new wells, an annual dividend of US$3m will allow 88E to stand still....and that's really about all shareholders can reasonably expect without further corporate activity.
If anyone on this forum is expecting a potential farm in partner in Alaska to deliver to 88E anything other than a massive dilution (to the assets) and therefore tiny W.I. percentage then I contend they're being incredibly naïve. Going further still, if anyone expects a future farm in partner in Alaska to pay cash to 88E in recognition of back costs then I want what they're smoking!
1/5 @ 15:00
Dear, oh dear taximan57. I note you're still having trouble comprehending the E&P sector; still having trouble comprehending the distinct investment cases of individual companies within that sector; and definitely still having huge difficulty in comprehending how E&P stocks account for cash spent on activities and how the results from those activities can add or subtract value in the company's equity. Yikes!
Taximan57 - when a company doesn't yet produce and sell its oil/gas and yet is active in the field drilling and flow testing wells then how on earth is that expenditure going to be accounted for other than by declaring a headline loss? I've got to ask, are you intentionally posting facile content or is it an added extra?!