The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring financial educator and author Jared Dillian has been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
A realist howezap... a realist. A realist with a good holding ;-)
Anyone wanting to deramp this share has a lot of material to work with !
( it's low grade though ! )
Wink !
With 92 likely all negative posts LW wouldnt that make you a prolific deramper?
A4444 that comment was not aimed at you !
Completely agree Neil, as a rule of thumb, posters on bb’s shouldn’t be trusted and taking anything information wise from the bb with a spade full of salt would be advisable. (Unless there is evidence to back up said statements)
For the record, I’m one of the guys who claims to have a decent sized holding here and have been here since the Nelson/Chepica/Manica acquisition days, I would encourage you as the reader to not even trust what I say without checking for yourself / doing your own research. (That’s where my penchant for referencing comes in to play)
So many posters try to assert an air of authority over the bb based on jobs that they “definitely have” or huge share holdings that “definitely exist”.
It’s a dangerous game getting caught up believing anyone’s story on here. Ignore the noise, do the work, understand the business, invest at your own risk.
Was Peter Hall a private investor or a fund? Believe he was TR1 but after rebalancing dropped below threshold. Was a regular poster (1plus1) but stopped posting on here although active elsewhere.
"Its the rampers who claim to be buying that I would be wary of tbh"
The only person who claimed to be buying was me, so I assume thats another snidey dig at me.
I've has enough of this now. You give your honest opinion and be truthful and just get it thrown back as a snidey dig.
All the best guys. I'm off !
Good luck
"BUT no one ever actually declares a TR1 and there is always an excuse, even though lots claim to have well in excess of the 3% threshold."
I've been here years, and I've never seen anyone claim they have over 3%
856M in issue means over 25M shares for 3% and I've never seen anyone on here state that they have that.
If that was a snidey did and me saying I have 4 family isa accounts - I've stated that years ago and would not generate a TR1 if all were in the same account
Its the rampers who claim to be buying that I would be wary of tbh
Family accounts is hardly an excuse lol
Haha it's amazing how many people on these anonymous LSE boards say they own blah blah shares and are buying more and more as its such a wonderful purchase BUT no one ever actually declares a TR1 and there is always an excuse, even though lots claim to have well in excess of the 3% threshold.
I think they forget their own lies until they are pointed out by fellow suspicious posters.
Im sure some are genuine but anyone who buys after following such probable BS from an anonymous chat board poster should not be allowed to handle cash!!
Not when I have all my holding split into four family individual ISA accounts :)
Feck me A4444 - You'll be declaring 3% soon!
F100
I think this is at or near bottom now.
I'm expecting the sp to start to fall sharply now....
Just had a small top up 200K and with my judgment sp will probably fall :)
If ask goes below 1.25 I'll be doing the same again.
Taking everything into account, this is seriously undervalued imho
AIMHO
What the f .... Over zealous filtering removed
doctor quin ton hills
on nsw tms annual report for el8585 has been lodged by *****on hills today. i can't see the details.
el5574 is due shortly as well on licence anniversary.
no new applications lodged however eg for new drilling etc
Littlewing thanks for coming back to me I miss understood how this works, so we need to wait for the next RNS to find out what XTR will recieve bottom line.
Bluebrazilians... that is not actually what the situation is. Empress are on a royalty. They get 3% of production regardless of what profit MMP are on. We get approx 23% of MMP profit.
Not sure everyone follow Empress on twitter who recieve 3% of the gold profit from Manica, XTR recieve 23%.
Alex Sherron in a interview 16th June 6mins 50s in said Empress will recieve $1.6 m dollars per annum when fully ramped up which is very close to happening, XTR get over 7 times this revenue per annum over $10 million per annum
Just read on TG someone asking why has more not made of the 450 to 550 a month CB stated - which is now stated AFTER production has commenced so more believable
This is a really good question.
The answer is because of CB. No trust in anything he says, even when its highly likely that he's stating the truth or very near it (according to my own calcs)
Any other co on AIM would see an appreciation in SP. on that news. But CB legacy issues have stopped that until we see that in an RNS
CB is now a liability here, not an asset imho
You could be right there, he will have to drop some positive news before the AGM or it's going to be a very unpleasant experience for him.
I agree NTMU, the manica revenue statement was the first time we have had an answer to the question floated regularly......i.e. is the 23% of profits actually being beneficial to XTR or is the contractor milking it through clever accounting allocations of CAPEX....
450 to 550K is definitely within the region of the expectations of many...... and an RNS would be good to support this.
Maybe a quarterly production update before the AGM is what he is aiming for.
The SP opened at 1.20 and still is at 1.20, £6K traded, 508k shares traded, more sold than bought.
With respect, the market couldn't care less.