The latest Investing Matters Podcast episode featuring Jeremy Skillington, CEO of Poolbeg Pharma has just been released. Listen here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Howezap... straight yes or no answer... do you agree with Dani's revenue forecasts for XTR ?
Are any of you Dani Bashers brave enough to attend the AGM after some of the cruel comments you have made?
When you rock up the the hotel, Dani is gonna breccia arms!
Dani... perhaps the anal comments commenced when you stubbornly refused to accept that the deal for FB was on a profit sharing basis and not your blatantly rampy fabrication.
Options will lapse five years after the date of the award, being 24 July 2026.
Soz ma not on TG. Can’t recall staff incentivised warrants but I’m sure they have not yet expired. ‘25 rings a bell tho ( not checked)
Yes thats right Kevin. you've got it thats right.
Colin should copy and paste that and put it on the website and then do a roast to tell us all about it !!
MA
look it up in the RNS's
We are not your own personal google
stop being sooo lazy !
And we sitting on 1.5 p. ?
Hi Backtotgesoil I’m just trying to show why there is plenty to be optimistic about and try to dispel the whole idea that cb is a complete bull hitter. The project is not in a dire situation I firmly believe.
Howezap. It seems that no matter how dire things could be, you would still find grounds for optimism.
Who haven’t seen the mining study and up to date production figures yet to determine any assessment of credibility. So just what exactly are they basing that assessment on? I think it’s unbelievable there are still many that don’t know what they have bought into.
I’m taking this from a geological perspective.
"CB’s statements were then and probably are credible. " Unbelievable. The share price is a more reliable assessment of the credibility of CB's statements.
Here’s a thought.
The historical EM survey showed the early potential that RC had a strike length of circa 3k and CB’s enthusiasm of a T1 mine with 2mt was certainly feasible on that basis. Those early enthusiastic statements at ‘21 AGM and shareholder presentation were based on those early surveys. And could well have been the case. It wasn’t until a bit later in Dec ‘21 when the lower blob was identified as a separate porphyry and the S/SE of RC defined with weak mineralisation between the two.
Realistically if RC and Ascot were all fully delineated, adding to current estimated resource then there is good chance there is over 2mtCuEq anyway, the very same 2mt first hinted at.
As has been said, is far better value to show a viable mine, that will pay back capital first, to then open up the lower grades to be more economically extracted with only Op costs and any ongoing capital to ramp up. Rather, than to continue with further exploration to keep adding to the resource.
Remember those comments that BR will be “a starter project for a buyer to take on” There are some already identified areas of interest and will be further untapped resource that Xtract will not get anywhere near fully revealing. So no, at this stage of the resource evolution it will not be considered a T1 or anywhere near it, but could well go onto be a huge long life mine. One step at a time.
CB’s statements were then and probably are credible, it’s just the work that goes into showing a viable project on the scale of BR that he hasn’t been as up front about.
Yes you are correct - GGP will end up 1p in 2073!
@Joey2024
Fact check for GGP:
Wyloo and other options and warrants 352,620,000 @ 10.0p
So NOT billions of warrants outstanding as you keep stating.
>>Jamie, no. They were of the opinion that it would follow long term trends. There would be substitution rather than increased demand and the hype wouldn't materialise.
Disagree with AA on that, at least in the next 50yrs. Ofc there may be a substitution for copper as tech moves on but non-digital tech moves slowly and a magical solution, over electrification, will not come any time soon.
Nuclear is the way forward IMO, but remember that it's just a power generation unit - We still need all this copper for infrastructure
The panel at the indaba were confident in gold remaining strong. Central banks are buyers and with the recent sanctions over Ukraine there is now less incentive for some countries to hold dollar denominated assets.
"When am ready will contact Shaun direct."
Feel a bit for howezap tbh.....
"Jez you are a menace and my patience is running thin. "
Never mind Ma TwinkleBaker, just rack up another line and chiiiillllllllLLLL !!
Stop talking rollex.
You actually put people off
Re post 1525hrs
LW I see what you mean. Read the last three posts , said poster is either in too deep or really doesn’t understand investing.
Let alone trying to ramp!
"If she would tell us what she is taking, we could all try it and could then make sense of what is otherwise unintelligible."
I still don't think Colin's forward earnings guidance will make much sense.
Listening to the indaba this afternoon l think l have just been sold on the nuclear idea. Does seem to make sense. Then l realise there is a certain person in Russia who has a lot of gas and oil, controls a nuclear power station in Ukraine and might find it convenient to change peoples opinion about that. This Green argument getting too complicated for me. But some interesting debate at the Indaba regardless.
If she would tell us what she is taking, we could all try it and could then make sense of what is otherwise unintelligible.