Ben Richardson, CEO at SulNOx, confident they can cost-effectively decarbonise commercial shipping. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
In case anyone is unaware on how to vote for the upcoming AGM resolutions, then you can simply phone up your broker and provide your voting instructions.
I was incorrectly awaiting a “corporate action” notification for my account like I have received in prior years but found out after phoning them this notification isn’t always in place (Halifax Share Dealing for me ).
Wanted to therefore flag in case anyone was unsure on how to vote, as every one counts!
Addicknt - not much in the way of disagreement from me.
I suppose I just thought this was the one. Hopefully we can all use the final outcome to our benefit in whichever way the individual prefers. That's the main thing at the end of the day.
Bozi, of course your point about not replacing key people is spot-on. How many companies looking towards the long-term decide they don't need a permanent CEO and CFO? Answer:None.
As to the general point about value, my view is that we'll got a good price based upon where the company is now in terms of its development. We will not get a price based upon potential value in 10 years time, obviously. But the fact is, and always has been, the company will never be able to deliver that long term value because it cannot deliver a funded, independent future.
Once this has been accepted as a statement of fact, it's easier to come to terms with the reality of our situation.
My bad...
Ther fallback is directly becauae of the US Jobs Report which means the FED will keep interest rates tighter for longer than the market is currently betting...
And when the US sneezes the rest of the world catches a cold...
However...this is all incidental to the SOLG takeover bid(s)...
Except if the battle drifts into the first quarter...
*invariably chew
*shakes head*
Well Monte, there's probably an element of truth in that comment.
I think in Stackhigh's case there is an intelligence there but people misinterpret it because the overall message is intentionally to counter their intuition.
As I said, I don't agree with that overall message but I do respect Stackhigh's attempted positioning to counter what can become an echo chamber when certain posters get on a roll.
You know where I stand. I don't wish to labour the point. I believe and have for some time that the outcome will be a less than satisfactory handover of our flagship asset and probably everything else besides. It'll probably be an indictment of SolGold biting off more than they could invariably true, although I still believe the strategy was right to pursue a regional portfolio - on the basis that Ecuador was hugely ubderexplored due to historic mining policy and the opportunity that arose was one the company was right to take. It's how they capitalised upon that was sub-optimal.
If StackHigh wanted to justify his position, he could offer an explanation to the company's decision not to replace the key executives and personnel that have recently left the company, namely our Chief of People Tania Cashman. Every organisation needs good people in HR and it seems SolGold are happy to carry on as they are. That, and the outcomes set out for consideration by the strategic review.
Q2 2023 will be the time in my opinion, particularly if recession has started to bite and copper demand slows. Oh will we be ripe.
tree shake...
Typo: intellect
You talk about intellectual Bozi,
But there is clearly not much going about if you can't see through certain things.
Thank you red always interested in what you share and to be honest quady too but don't find it attractive when he's so dismissive of your thoughts as many have different opinions of how this is going to play out but what seems to be unanimous is the present SP is a bit of a gift I can't buy anymore because I need to sleep peacefully but of course if I'm fortunate enough to double my money I won't moan to myself that I should have gone bigger !
StackHigh - if you don't mind me saying you are kind of wasting your time with the intellect.
You end up getting accused of not holding, of wanting a cheaper entry, of being a BHP shill, etc.
After some time of being open to everyone's views I am now wielding the filter. Bubble was the first to go on it this week for the incessant nonsense and there will be one or two more to add.
Keep firing your opinion out there and don't take no muck. I don't agree with you by the way in terms of still being around at the 2023 AGM, and I think some of your justification is flimsy, but you're entitled to it nonetheless.
Sp has been going good since a certain poster stopped jinxing it, as soon as it returns watch what happens...
BHP perchance Monte...?
Go on, Monte, don't hide behind ambiguity. What are you trying to say? Is this an accusation?
There is a lot of conspiracy here, from 'paid posters', to '1 trades', to 'algorithms' that 'walk the price down'. Couldn't it be that were a small cap explorer awaiting corporate action, with an sp that floats up and down on rumour, news and low volume? Ockham's razor and all that.
Stack
Your narrative fits in perfectly with an interested party who want the company,but don't want to move now and are very concerned with recent developments .
That Coincides perfectly with your arrival.
Am I good or what?
I'm always interested (genuinely, not stirring) by the significance placed on the tsx price compared to here. Is it just that it trades 'out of hours ' compared to LSE, so you use it as a bellwether? Or is it that the price changes are more dramatic (owing to market precedent, exchange rate, much smaller volume etc).
Monte. I maintain that a sale is highly likely. Just not within the next 12 months. The 'sale imminent' brigade on here have already started shifting their own timelines as they realise these things take ages, and the big boys with deep pockets don't rush. But we have proved we can get cash for the next couple of years, so people here don't need to worry. Just be patient. :)
I think there's news pending looking at recent trading here and tsx and cgp imho
Have a look at a five day graph and see how this has stepped up...plateauing and then moving on...steadily...
16.85
17.20
17.40
17.56
17.96
18.42
19.14/16
Higher lows and higher highs all the way up...
Now the thing is, its Friday...will we see book closing for the weekend or will people be too nervous to sell...FOMO...?
With the strategic review being conducted by a section of the shareholder group who have openly called for a monetization event and all the press coverage, could you not argue that all the folk calling a possible sale of the company very unlikely are actually derampers and some quite possibly do have in fact ulterior motives
The willful, deliberate misrepresentation of A trades is tedium itself, isn't it?
Again, for those who missed it (not Red- he knows the facts and will ramp regardless) - 'A' trades are those not made through a market maker (labelled 'O'). Whether they are labelled as buy or sell is largely irrelevant - this label is automatically ascribed based on which side of a bid/offer average they sit, and is a hangover from a system that reported trades before A trades were common. The A does not stand for 'algorithm' (lol!). And this explanation is freely available on the internet for anyone looking to read without rampy bias :)
Good movement in recent days. We remain undervalued to say that we now have enough cash to run the business for a good long time, and proof that we can raise more cash when we need to in coming years.
And at the price Jerry...similar pattern to the last month or so...
36/38 trades Algos buying at 19.14/19.16...whats holding this back...?
HL still happy to take all my 400k, though Barclays did baulk at the 2.6m...
Loads of Algo Buys at 19.16...ready to blow...?