focusIR May 2024 Investor Webinar: Blue Whale, Kavango, Taseko Mines & CQS Natural Resources. Catch up with the webinar here.

Less Ads, More Data, More Tools Register for FREE

Pin to quick picksBerkeley Eng Regulatory News (BKY)

Share Price Information for Berkeley Eng (BKY)

London Stock Exchange
Share Price is delayed by 15 minutes
Get Live Data
Share Price: 19.90
Bid: 19.00
Ask: 20.80
Change: 1.70 (9.34%)
Spread: 1.80 (9.474%)
Open: 18.50
High: 20.15
Low: 18.30
Prev. Close: 18.20
BKY Live PriceLast checked at -

Watchlists are a member only feature

Login to your account

Alerts are a premium feature

Login to your account

Salamanca Uranium Project Update

16 Dec 2010 09:49

RNS Number : 0804Y
Berkeley Resources Limited
16 December 2010
 



16 December 2010

 

 

BERKELEY RESOURCES LIMITED

 

Highly Encouraging Results from Tank Leach and Heap Leach Test Work at the Salamanca Uranium Project

 

Berkeley Resources Limited is pleased to announce highly encouraging results from completion of the Phase 1 Feasibility Study tank leach metallurgical test workprogramme at the Salamanca Uranium Project in Spain. Extensive dynamic leach tests have yielded uranium extraction in excess of 93% in acid batch leach tests for bulk samples from Palacios and Alameda and in excess of 87% for representative samples from Sageras. Acid leach is a proven technology and was previously used in the Quercus Processing Plant at the Salamanca Operation from 1994 to 2000.

 

Key results from this test work undertaken at the SGS Lakefield Laboratories in Perth, Australia, are summarised below:

 

·; Leach recoveries greater than 93% at Palacios and Alameda and 87% at Sageras using an acid based process at high slurry densities of 1.7 to 1.8;

·; Low power consumption due to a relatively coarse grind in the leach of P80 ~750 microns;

·; Rapid leach times - approximately 10 to 12 hours at Alameda and 12 to 14 hours at Sageras;

·; Ambient leach temperatures of 20ºC;

·; Lowsulphuric acid consumptions of 7 to 12 kg/t at Sageras, 15 to 18 kg/t at Alameda and 23 to 25 kg/t at Palacios;

·; Minimal recovery of impurities;

·; A simplified extraction flow sheet, similar to that employed in uranium acid leach processing elsewhere in the world;

·; Reduction of environmental issues with the generation of a "dry" leach residue.

 

The combination of low acid consumption, coarse grind size and relatively low power costs in Spain continues to drive the process operating costs to +/- US$15/lb U308 - well within the lower quartile in operations worldwide. Equally important to note are the rapid leach times from 10 - 14 hours at Sageras and Alameda, which have a significant impact on the projected CAPEX, by potentially reducing tankage and associated civil works, agitators and power.

 

Heap leach test work is in its initial stages, however, average recoveries from four 50 day column leach tests of Sageras samples were similar to tank leach results, although with slightly higher acid consumption. Intermittent bottle roll tests on Alameda samples and progress results for small leach columns of material from Alameda and Palacios suggest higher recoveries, consistent with the excellent results obtained from two Retortillo column tests in 2009.

 

The primary focus of the Phase 1 metallurgical test work programme is to produce sufficient process and engineering data for recommissioning of the Quercus Plant at an initial production rate of 2.1 Mlbs of U3O8 per annum. The ongoing heap leach test work is examining options for increasing production to over 5 Mlbs of U3O8 per annum, and also enabling more informed comparison of both processing options.

 

  

 

 

Enquiries - Managing Director: Ian Stalker Tel: +34 608 221 497  

RBC Capital Markets: Martin Eales Tel: +44 20 7029 7881

Introduction

 

The Salamanca Uranium Project consists of four separate areas containing a number of metasedimentary hosted uranium deposits located in the western part of the Salamanca Province in Spain. These deposits are near surface accumulations of open pittable uranium within close proximity to the Quercus Uranium Processing Plant.

 

During the year over 14,500 kg of representative diamond drill core was sent to the SGS Lakefield Laboratories in Perth, Australia for a comprehensive metallurgical test work campaign supervised by Orway Mineral Consultants (WA) Pty Ltd and Kappes Cassiday. The material was selected on the basis of lithology, oxidation and grade from the Sageras, Palacios North and Alameda South deposits.

 

The Phase 1 metallurgical test work programme was aimed at optimising process conditions for treating the uranium ore at Sageras, Alameda and Palacios in a tank leach configuration and enabling the re-commissioning of the Quercus Processing Plant at a capacity of 2.1 Mlb (0.95 Kt) of U3O8 per annum. It commenced in March 2010 and was completed on schedule in October 2010.

 

The following test work was completed:

 

·; Preliminary mineralogy on the various ore types and leach residues;

·; Comminution (crushing & grinding);

·; Preliminary ore sorting;

·; Flotation;

·; Ore upgrade by "Crush-Scrub-Screen" process;

·; Tank leaching;

·; Thickening and filtration;

·; Solvent extraction;

·; Geotechnical and geochemical testing of the leach residues;

·; Effluent neutralization;

·; Preliminary column leaching.

 

The test work has identified the flowsheet as being the optimal.

 

Tank Leach Test Results

 

The Phase 1 tank leach test work has delivered uranium extraction rates in excess of 93% at both Alameda and Palacios and in excess of 87% at Sageras. All tests to date have employed a coarse grind to the leach feed of P80~750 microns with the aim of minimizing energy requirements in the comminution circuit without sacrificing yield.

 

 

 

 

 

Typical process conditions are summarised in Table 1.

 

 

Material

Units

Palacios

Alameda

Sageras

Recovery

%

93

93

87

Sulphuric acid

(kg/t)

23 - 25

15 - 18

7 - 12

Leach Time

(hrs)

8 - 12

10 - 12

12 - 14

Pyrolusite

(kg/t)

1.7 - 2.2

1.4 - 1.8

2.0 - 2.5

Temperature

(ºC)

20

20

20

Slurry Specific Gravity

1.7 - 1.8

1.7 - 1.8

1.7 - 1.8

Table 1 - Leach Process Conditions for Palacios, Alameda and Sageras

 

The relatively coarse ground leach residues are readily filtered and washed to yield good recoveries of soluble uranium.

 

Sageras

A total of 26 whole-of-ore batch leach tests have provided the following conditions:

 

·; acid consumption - low by industry standards at 7 - 12 kg/t of ore feed;

·; pyrolusite consumption of 2.0 to 2.5 kg/t;

·; ambient temperature of approximately 20ºC;

·; coarse grind of P80 ~750 microns, and

·; leach slurry density of 65% to 70% solids.

 

Mineralogical studies indicate that recoveries above 87% for Sageras may not be cost effective.

 

Palacios

This deposit is the most amenable to acid leaching with high extractions of uranium at high slurry pH and shorter residence times. Higher acid requirements (about double Sageras), are close to the industry average.

 

Optimal conditions are:

 

·; acid consumption = 23 - 25 kg/t;

·; pyrolusite consumption of 1.7 to 2.2 kg/t;

·; ambient temperature of 20ºC;

·; coarse grind with P80 ~750 microns;

·; leach slurry density of 65% to 70% solids, and

·; leach pH of approximately 2.

 

 

Acid leach extractions of 93% are readily achievable at Palacios.

 

 

Alameda

The Alameda tests yield similar leach efficiencies to Palacios, but with significantly lower reagent requirements.

 

High extractions of 93 to 94% were readily and frequently achieved.

 

The optimal conditions for leaching the Alameda composite are:

 

·; acid consumption of 15 to18 kg/t - low by industry averages.

·; pyrolusite consumption of 1.4 to 1.8 kg/t;

·; operating temperature of 20ºC;

·; a coarse grind size of P80 ~750 microns, and

·; leach slurry density of 65% to 70%.

 

Heap Leach

 

A substantial programme of intermittent bottle roll leach tests and column tests is in progress at the SGS Lakefield laboratories in Perth based on representative drill core samples from the Alameda, Sageras and Palacios deposits Optimisation programmes for Alameda and Sageras are still at the early stage of crush size assessment, but preliminary test results utilising 26 bottle roll tests for Alameda and 14 for Sageras have confirmed the following:

 

·; There is a consistent trend of increasing recovery with increasing head grade;

·; Uranium recovery appears to be independent of sample depth, lithology type, or oxidation level;

·; There are no identifiable trends of increasing acid consumption by head grade, depth, lithology type or oxidation level;

·; The 10-day intermittent roll bottle tests are a much better indicator of ultimate column test recovery than simple 5-day tests.

 

 

Column test results to date on Sageras lithology composites (-12.5mm crush in 100mm diameter by 1.7m tall columns) have been similar to the excellent results obtained on Retortillo samples in a programme conducted in 2009. Figure 6 presents the results of 4 x 50 day column tests completed on Sageras composites ranging in grade from 300 to 950 ppm U3O8. Three of the composites were reduced material while the 4th composite (SMP-T) was nearer-surface transition material. Extremely consistent leach results are noted, with excellent uranium recoveries and exceptionally low acid consumptions.

 

Heap leach testwork results to date are notable for their overall coherence which suggests that the dominant control on recoveries is uranium mineralogy, textures and grain size. Results from Sageras and Alameda are consistent with earlier results from Retortillo using 4m x 100mm diameter columns. They are also supported by progress results for 12 x 1m and 2 x 2m columns that are currently investigating the effects of crush size on composite samples from Sageras, Alameda and Palacios.

 

The programme of optimisation testing with small and intermediate size columns on Alameda, Sageras and Palacios composites, will be followed by a similar programme on Retortillo composites to assist comparisons of tank leach and heap leach options. The outcomes from this work will also establish parameters for the Phase two test work utilizing larger columns.

 

The information in this report that relates to the metallurgical test work results is based on information compiled by Mr Grenvil Dunn, who is a Chemical Engineer and a Member of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Mr Dunn is a Technical Consultant with Orway Mineral Consultants (WA) Pty Ltd who are consultants of Berkeley Resources. Mr Dunn has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (The JORC Code).
 
The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results, Mineral Resources or Ore Reserves is based on information compiled by Mr. Ross Corben, who is a Member of The Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and an employee of Berkeley Resources Limited. Mr. Corben has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2004 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr. Corben consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears.

  

A full version of this announcement including images can be downloaded from Berkeley's website at www.berkeleyresources.com.au.

This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
 
END
 
 
MSCTFBLTMBIBMFM
Date   Source Headline
26th Apr 20247:00 amRNSBoard Changes
26th Apr 20247:00 amRNSQuarterly Report March 2024
10th Apr 20247:32 amRNSCommencement of Arbitration against Spain
13th Mar 20247:05 amRNSHalf-Year Accounts
30th Jan 20247:00 amRNSQuarterly Report December 2023
2nd Jan 20247:00 amRNSExpiry of Unlisted Options
27th Dec 20237:00 amRNSPermitting update
21st Dec 20237:00 amRNSReport on Payments to Govts
21st Nov 20237:00 amRNSResult of AGM
30th Oct 20237:00 amRNSSeptember 2023 Quarterly
11th Oct 20237:00 amRNSNotice of AGM
22nd Sep 20237:00 amRNSDate of Annual General Meeting
30th Aug 20237:00 amRNS2023 Annual Report
26th Jul 20237:57 amRNSIssue of Unlisted Options
24th Jul 20237:00 amRNSQuarterly Report June 2023
19th Jul 20237:00 amRNSResults of Meeting
19th Jun 20237:00 amRNSNotice of General Meeting
31st May 20237:00 amRNSExpiry of Unlisted Options
28th Apr 20237:00 amRNSQuarterly Report March 2023
3rd Apr 202312:12 pmRNSPermitting Update
14th Mar 20237:00 amRNSHalf-year Report
7th Feb 20234:40 pmRNSSecond Price Monitoring Extn
7th Feb 20234:35 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
7th Feb 20231:12 pmRNSPermitting Update
31st Jan 20237:00 amRNSQuarterly Report December 2022
26th Jan 20234:40 pmRNSSecond Price Monitoring Extn
26th Jan 20234:35 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
3rd Jan 20237:00 amRNSExpiry of Unlisted Options
22nd Dec 20227:00 amRNSReport on Payments to Governments
1st Dec 20227:00 amRNSUnlisted Options
18th Nov 20227:00 amRNSNotification of Investment Dispute
15th Nov 20227:00 amRNSResult of AGM
9th Nov 20227:00 amRNSBerkeley establishes Spanish Advisory Committee
27th Oct 20227:00 amRNSQuarterly Report September 2022
20th Oct 20222:13 pmRNSPublication of a Prospectus
4th Oct 20227:00 amRNSNotice of AGM
23rd Sep 20224:35 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
19th Sep 20227:45 amRNSDate of AGM
31st Aug 202210:00 amRNS2022 Annual Report
29th Jul 20227:00 amRNSQuarterly Report June 2022
5th Jul 20227:00 amRNSChange of Director’s Interest Notice
28th Jun 20227:00 amRNSStrengthening of Board with Spanish Based Director
29th Apr 20227:00 amRNSQuarterly Report March 2022
29th Apr 20227:00 amRNSQuarterly Report March 2022
5th Apr 20228:46 amRNSNotice of Initial Substantial Holder
5th Apr 20227:00 amRNSNotice of Initial Substantial Holder
1st Apr 20227:00 amRNSSettlement of OIA Claim
24th Mar 20224:36 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
24th Mar 20222:00 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
24th Mar 202211:05 amRNSSecond Price Monitoring Extn

Due to London Stock Exchange licensing terms, we stipulate that you must be a private investor. We apologise for the inconvenience.

To access our Live RNS you must confirm you are a private investor by using the button below.

Login to your account

Don't have an account? Click here to register.

Quickpicks are a member only feature

Login to your account

Don't have an account? Click here to register.