Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
I'm afraid I would have to be sat here for a very long time before that song came into my mind. How about Stiff Little fingers... I don't like you
Hands back our asset... Sounds weak
Just hang in there Crab. Those shares ain't worth diddley unless a minor miracle happens.
Unless you REALLY REALLY need the money.
Sell half if you must. But keep your iron in the fire.
You'll swear A LOT more if that miracle happens.
Atb Z
For those who venture into the dark side, is there much gloating or urine extraction or is frr ancient history.
And he has worked for the CIA.. Uncanny
Twice nothing... Still nothing
We can only hope that the money spent lobbying can rescue something for us.. Otherwise all imo is lost.
Good luck to all lth. Sadly I think we will need some.
Ga Ga more like
incalculable - rubbish
unquantifiable - now that's a proper word !
Unquantifiable. Anyone care to remind me why that was my favourite word. I think I'm losing my short term whatsisname.
Dec 11 - 6 weeks after the election. Something stinks.
However if it works in my favour, I'm all for it.
A day with no posts whatever next
Wearing a bit thin now Coggy isn't it.
Excellent sleuthing just about keeping us going but I am not expecting a result here now.
Another Christmas without presents Zaza - 3rd on the trot.
What's Georgian for Grinch? ZAZA ?
Merry Christmas to all LTH and South African Covid to the other lot.
Someone posts something worth reading, someone else finds a disagreeing POV. It ends up with a bit of a ****ging match and the original post is lost in the history.
It always pays to page back a bit when the second someone posts plenty.
There is a lot of circumstantial evidence suggesting we will be included but no proof.
There may well be reasons for the lack of communication but it just doesn't help.
People are entitled to feel positive or negative because of the lack of proof.
Personally, I feel much more positive now than when Hope's begging letter was uncovered.
Good luck all LTH - Hope you will be short term so FFFF off.
Thanks as ever to the super sleuths for keeping us in the picture.
I agree Ophir - this is cut & pasted from Musica's member area - first post
I have never posted on LSE before but have decided that I need to make my opinion known on the current discussion.
For clarity, I have held FRR since 2012 and am in the shareholder group.
I totally disagree with sending the letter at this time and fail to see why there is such urgency to send it now though I am fully aware that there are those with agendas here who would wish the company to fail.
Looed I have, in the past, appreciated your research and the translations but I feel that you are misguided in this instance. You have, of course, every right to do what you wish with your investment but if, in the process, that impinges on other people’s investments you need to tread very carefully. You have absolutely no right to jeopardise my investment.
The paragraph about some shareholders not supporting the action of sending the letter is merely a sop as the damage is already done in the first paragraphs. The fact that it has appeared on this BB does not make it official in the way that actually sending it would
To say that the election will not make a difference is, in my opinion, short-sighted. We cannot know what will happen and what the effect on FRR may be.
So Looed, I do hope that you will reconsider your action and postpone it until the end of October.
I am in the wait til the elections camp.
I wouldn't do what SR suggests out of principle - he has an agenda.
However, I appreciate all the efforts and ideas from Looed.
Sorry no vote from me for that theory.
Unless..... ZZ (RR) bangs on about how wonderful ZZ is to show he not ZZ cos only a complete Harris would indulge in constant self praise.
Also, if Zaza is truthful about the 2 from 14 result - BIG IF - then what kind of information could he have presented to change these results.
a) Pay your tax
b) give back the unworked areas as per PSA
a) the discussion about this would involve VAT offset - irrevalent say panel - ok we'll pay up
b) this would involve - you've made it too hard for us to work those areas - panel makes a 'sorry FRR' judgement
If it was clear the other 12 would be rejected - why should he present anything?