RE: PFS10 Oct 2021 23:44
Hi Trumble......I think you'd fit in well as a stockbroker, chatting to other stock brokers but as you well know, we're not stockbrokers. If you'd 'popped in' more often, then you'd know that I guess. Your last sojourn to LSE was 5 months ago?
So let me enlighten you (but using proletariat parlance):
Canaccord gave 25p in June. Others have also made bids, the highest being 29p by BB.
Hannam have quoted 33p. Take your pick. Only Canaccord advised a speculative bid, the others unanimously: "Buy".
https://www.lse.co.uk/ShareBrokerTips.asp?shareprice=GGP&share=Greatland-Gold
I'm an advocate of brokers (boo) because they know more than the punter does and they feed my DD, but I also know their limits. This year even though GGP's fundamentals haven't changed, the broker notes have. They have dropped their recommendations simply because sentiment has dropped.
Sentiment is now back. Broker notes will be back too, to reflect this change in sentiment. Broker prices will lag the market but they will be higher now the dust has settled.
Here's the crux Trumble, using one's own calculations for the SP...post the MRE(inferred) in December, suggests the SP has a long way to go yet. Rather than give you my calculations (I am sure yours are just as plausible), I think this example more easily demonstrates them:
https://mobile.twitter.com/Robbiebobby1/status/1413167025644580869
Remember, the year started with a broker note of 66p for 12.5MozAuEq and you have chosen the lowest broker note for the year (june) of 25p for 11MozAuEq.
Nothing changed or happened officially in between those two very different notes @ Hav, so why are you biasing towards the latter?
If you are well immersed in this stock....you wouldn't have posed your conundrum, perhaps.
Or...perhaps....................... :)
Z