Member Info for yoshie

Ha! ha! Playtime little pig.

Logically, how can it be someone in the action group when the holding % is up from 9.27% to 10.21% and the members in the group still same except add 1? (please observe contents of RNS) or am I missing something?

Sorry to say this happybluedays. When previous RNS was out I remember you were so upset about the notes in the RNS which perceived as not taking in new members and have a negative view of the RNS. And in today's RNS notes stated to welcome new NEW shareholders invited to join the action group if they wish and you've form your opinion that the action group is struggling. Really whatever which way can't win isn't it? I thought you're a bigger person that this. Fortunately, the action group didn't take you on as they probably much prefer longer term and more serious and loyal investors backing Adam R. and Nick L. and not a day trader - one that blow with the wind and all the noises. Read the notes on today's RNS again and note it's purpose: "********** has reformed to offer positive shareholder support to New World Oil & Gas." Anyway don't get caught out and good luck to your other investments.

Sorry, cash, not exactly back up your previous post - you're talking about selling half holding and buying back at placing price. Which in simple maths for e.g.. if holds 1m shares. Sell half, i.e.. 500k shares and buy at placing if 1:1 for shareholders; which then you get 1m shares again. But for profit your 1m shares will give what the 1m shares will turn to. IMO, I'm working on holding to current amount of shares ie. per above e.g.. 1m shares. If placing is 1:1 you then can allocated to buy another 1m shares at placing price which will be discount of the current sp. of that time. That will brings to 2m shares. In which case the profit/gains will be more than double of above e.g..

As we know Adam R. has been voted in onboard the BOD since Nov. and in the background doing what he said he'll be doing ie. looking for a good asset to RTO in his interview. He also said he cares about shareholders' value and if a placing is needed to kick start the new business , he'll want to buy in at the placings price and the same will be offered to current shareholders to enjoy the same benefit as him. Have a listen to his interview again on youtube if you wish to. Below is someone's post on the NYO bb (LSE) about Adam R.: Go listen to any Adam Reynolds interview where he describes his approach. His philosophy (and any ethical turn around person) is to look after existing shareholders first. Yes he will fundraise to do an RTO but critically the existing shareholders are respected and given as good if not better terms than new ones. People bring him in exactly because they know he won't screw them over - which is why they vote in favour. If you back him on the journey, he respects that and reciprocates.

http://www.sharepickers.com Podcast 428 with Justin Waite yesterday (Stocks mentioned on the podcast incl: #LEG #88E #ONZ #NEW #GWIK #BP. > http://bit.ly/VOXPOD0428) - mention of NEW near the end of this podcast @46:44 saying this is right time to buy. Podcast always say to DYOR as speaker normally owns shares in that co. Also can listen on : https://audioboom.com/boos/4270239-428-doc-holiday-legendary-investments-and-primarybid.

My guess is: someone wanted a certain large amount of shares but as you know it's usual not able to buy for large amount so broker probably got to break into smaller lots to buy and also sp. at better price (my experience is when it is a good buys day you can't get quote for over 1mil. shares). Also larger amount will have high sp. quoted. I guess is a broker because there're some buys slightly over 1mil. shares and if this buyer buying for himself he'll probably want to save on trading fees and buy the max. at best price. A broker probably don't pay any trading fee or very small fee so they doesn't worry about the cost effective.

Cash belongs to the shareholders of the company. And NO, they can't have it. They may have to pay back some cash to the co. for what they've taken.

WoW! Full ask price paid for 950,000 shares @£712.50. Look forward to further sp. rising.

Well said, badger. Just to further add there's nothing extraordinary about by being in the action group - just the members doing their best to give their utmost support for new direction. In fact they got to sacrifice with their buying/selling freely otherwise might trigger some legality issue and commit to certain boundaries - all they do this for what? - For the sake to support the betterment for all shareholders who will benefit later. We should also thank Ben and Gary for leading this mission as they do it without asking for a penny and spending time and and effort to make the goal happens. For example they flown to Jersey to represent many shareholders in EGM so they can win the objective on their own time and expense. Remember Ben said at that time in twitter that he got to bring his little daughter along as his partner was away. He even took his mother along so when he attended the EGM she was there to look after his little girl. How about that? Are we grateful for the trouble he got to go through? - Yes, I'm am. Thoroughly moved, grateful and deeply appreciative. If you wish to have a TR-1 out you can easily do it by buying more shares to get to the 3% of company's shares and then you will have a TR-1 out.

the BOD has just been filed by one of the significant shareholders to be removed. And there'll be positive changes from oil promising business planned. Many other significant shareholders are supporting this removal too. (Sp. rising crazy). Similar will happen here soon.

Happyblue, thanks for your post. I understand your view. To start with, yes, anyone can and must file a TR-1 provided he/she holds 3% or more of the company's shares. As some other posters here had said, and I also added, that the action group's aim is to support Adam R., Nick Lee and shareholders. We already know what Adam R. wants to do and that why the action group is to support that vision too and not let the old BOD 'bullied' that. You sound very passionate about this issue and as Stan and I have suggested - it'll be a good idea to pop a line to Ben (action group's email on the RNS). Believe me, the action group is working in good faith for all shareholders' value, especially those who suffered much losses holding over the years and that the reason the NWOG action group was formed. Remember I posted before that 'Unity is strength' and 'Trust in Friendship'.'

Totally agree to stan70's post @10.42. Action group reformed to support Adam R., Nick Lee and shareholders' interests. Re: 18 Feb. RNS - Action group thought achieving just slightly over 3% as appropriate and not to be as overwhelmed. But other previous members of that group wanted to show support too so were allowed back in. Am sure it was just a matter of simplicity that the previous members were asked again this time round as they've stayed in touch and nothing else - no funny agenda or dirty play. Remember that if anyone or any group/organisation if holds 30% or more in any Aim company, legally they got to offer to buy the whole company - so this is also one of the reasons to be watching the % holdings. Also remember that to work in an amicable and professional approach is a better way forward to successful business negotiation and dialogue. If anyone still not happy about this issue why not drop the NWOG action group a line - the email is clearly on the RNS. Hope we can all look forward to what we are here to achieve.

Good morning Goooba. You're correct in your earlier post, but do you mean this month not next month as is 1st March today. cheers

Held not huge amount so didn't follow very close. So what will happen here now? Will we get paid something on our holdings? I've held these for few years and thought OXS got a case to win (would have sold out couple years ago otherwise). Hope we're not getting nothing.

Good listen. http://www.*************.com/views/18529/tom-winnifrith-bearcast-5-february-do-not-overpay-for-adam-reynolds-magic LSE not allow full link. so fill *********** with share prophets (join these 2 words as one).com GLA.

He's (Adam R.) not on BOD until subscription is successful and also the shares to him is on subscription's success. IMHO there's still big risk if subcription don't go as planned.

Nope, Inpatient. QPP is now WTG -new home!

Further reading to Chequemate's post. Have anyone read this article posted today on shareprophets's site: InternetQ - the cover up is already underway - why hide evidence of "innacurate" allegations By Tom Winnifrith, The Sheriff of AIM | Friday 4 December 2015 - See more at: http://www.shareprophets.com/views/16979/internetq-the-cover-up-is-already-underway-why-hide-evidence-of-innaccuate-allegations#sthash.M3lm5Trg.dpuf

kenny100, that's a good article you've posted here. All posts for QPP are now to WTG. Perhaps you may like to re-post to the new home. cheers