Member Info for YorkshireLife

Intra-day highs don't count for a lot Ocelot / LL...

...mainly because the spread here is so wide and liquidity so abysmal. Even if the SP spikes... no PI would be able to take advantage unless volume increased 100 fold and the MM's played ball... which is NOT going to happen until Tidswell & chums pull their first rabbit out of that enormous black hat - money-sucking - hat of theirs!

But always bear in mind that BAD news appears here more than good... or as they say in Panto land (maybe also applicable to Pound Land?) :

"It's Behind You!"

Good Night

YL ;-)

I don't need to promote anything LL...

Merely responding to post. If some choose to do their research, then that is their call. If others don't... then that is their call too.

As always... I simply post facts... not advice.

The facts here are that Anguish still has an awful lot to do to prove up their last chance saloon asset, and in the meantime RiverDance still have a BIG overhang to shift...

1p and above in your dreams Ocelot...

Sorry for your loss

YL ;-)

I never filter you Arnie...

I enjoy your posts and find your responses very amusing. I have you pegged as either a retired teacher or psychologist - using your time here to indulge your passion now that you have more available time on your hands.

It takes all sorts... and the banter is rewarding here so long as you are able to step back from your emotions... I think some here struggle to do just that.

YL ;-)

Brian: "I’m in at the bottom which is the best place to be."

Let's hope your psychic Brian... because otherwise you are just like the rest of us... you "think" you got in at the bottom... but AIM companies (especially badly run ones like this one) "ALWAYS" come back to bite you!

People here called the bottom at 10p and 5p and 1p (mainly because the SP had never been that low before). The only reason an SP consistently rises is due to achievement of milestones... and sadly this company has missed each and every one to date!

If bad news lands again (which history suggests it will) then we will be seeing yet another new low shortly.

There are so many more sure fire winners on AIM right now. On my "other" investment I have a 3p average and it has risen consistently over the last few months to over 8p today. IMHO you are wasting your time and money here.

YL ;-)

jaguarflush... correct if we were the ones mining (which we are not) ... but since you obviously have done very little research on GGP... your assumption is completely wrong I'm afraid.

Oh, I'm sure you can guarantee that those "in the know" will already have been tipped off before Numis "officially" release their update... even then their broker note is not made available to ordinary PI's like us!

Ocelot,

GL replaced one death spiral finance arrangement with another... and helped Anguish hit a new all time low SP during his short tenure.
He's clearly an expert at something - it's just not very clear right now what that is?

Good Day to You too

YL ;-)

LL,

I will leave you to your own fantasy. The sun is shining and the hills are calling.

Good Day

YL ;-)

GL has NO oil or gas experience Ocelot. I therefore find it very hard to understand how Lucan brought "anything" to the table without "someone else's" prompting.

YL ;-)

LancashireLife...

I am simply stating the FACTUAL course of events as they happened (no breach of LSE rules for you I'm afraid)

Tidswell was banned and yet still managed to overthrow the previous MD to appoint his own (Lucan). One can only make a leap of faith here, but since he is a close friend of Tidswell's... was appointed by him... and since Lucan has ZERO oil & gas experience himself... it might therefore be safe to "assume" that Tidswell is still connected in a very significant way.

I'm sure he wouldn't have gone to all that time and trouble otherwise... do you?

YL ;-)

Ocelot,

The facts on the ground back then were that Tidwell was caught out... "supposedly" punished and thrown out. Therefore, investors (like myself back then) were willing to give Anguish a second chance. Suddenly, Tidswell's back again... orchestrates a coup... throws out Vonk and replaces him with Lucan (his chum with no oil or gas experience) and crashes the SP to new historic lows - from where it has never recovered.

After all that... You (and others) are now suggesting we should genuinely believe that Tidswell is no longer in control here TODAY or should trust him to do the right thing by shareholders anyway?

I am NOT invested today - and there's ONE very good reason for that: His name is Jonathan Tidswell.

YL ;-)

Ocelot,

Tidswell's non-compliance problems were never fully resolved. The truth had to be dragged out of him over a protracted period after a long investigation. Difficult for investors to make a proper judgement until Tidswell had been removed... Unfortunately he later popped back and stung us with his coup.

The reason I and others don't like Tidswell is that he has consistently been a toxic influence on this share and cannot be trusted to do the right thing by investors.

So long as he remains... The Market will be waving a big red flag over this company!

YL :-)

Lancashire Life,

You - of all people here - should know that we must not single out or mention other individual posters... as "certain people" use this as a convenient excuse to ask admin to remove the thread.

We must all stick to the LSE rules.

Good night to you too.

YL ;-)

Well Tidswell was tinkering with a water isolation plug on Twitter in March 2019 - still telling us all was fine - then there was Brockham complete failure and the damaging coup. His non-compliance failed to stop him removing Vonk and replacing him with a City chum with zero oil or gas experience.

Again... all old ground you've asked and I have answered many times before Ocelot...

Good Night!

YL ;-)

Ocelot: "That is precisely what you are not supposed to do, as an investor, YL."

You missed my point too... I am sitting on the side-lines watching and waiting for the ending from a safe distance remember?

As for the loss being my fault as apposed to that of Anguish... erm... I read the RNS's and followed the info Tidswell & chums posted. Back in the days when I believed management to be competent and trustworthy (more fool me).

Turns out none of it was even remotely accurate in the end (as Wolf has already said).

You complain about my posting & repeating myself... but I only do so because the cheerleaders conveniently forget every other day and ask me the same questions over again.

Oh well... I guess one of us will tire eventually...

YL ;-)

Coronation Street is a soap... not strictly a drama. Try Fargo or Killing Eve - more intelligent!

YL ;-)

LL,

You are totally missing the point (as usual)

Share investing is like watching a good TV drama - you get drawn in by the roller-coaster of emotions. Whatever the eventual turn of events... as the series draws to a close... you remain fascinated & don't want to miss out on the ending.

Will it be a climax or an anti-climax.... that is the question?

YL ;-)

As I've already pointed out LL:

I have been a shareholder for infinitely longer than you... just because I am not invested right now makes little difference as plenty of folk are just day trading here anyway.

What is the difference from me sitting on the fence airing my views to them... or you even?

YL ;-)

If management here were any good... I wouldn't need to repeat myself quite so often.

Ocelot,

Well we certainly aren't "holding management to account" by simply praising & rubber stamping everything they say & do.

I'll stick to the tried & tested method if you don't mind. Call me sceptical, but the fact that some here seem very determined to hush dissent makes me think management are listening & probably don't like what they hear.

YL ;-)