Adam Davidson, CEO of Trident Royalties, discusses offtake milestones and catalysts to boost FY24. Watch the video here.
btw no one quite pulls off the "smacked ****" face like matt does --- cheer up matt, you have a personal fortune that's way beyond your capability so smile and be grateful for your lot ;-)
Thanks for the links guys. If I had seen that and been a WPP shareholder I would have honestly sold the same day. WPP should stick to their proverbial knitting and stop dabbling areas that they have no expertise in or require huge amounts of investment over many years as we all know only too well
" Whatever happened to WPP's Everymile, are they still in business? "
Crafty the only WPP I know of is the comms and media group, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WPP_plc
Which WPP are you talking about ?
" Whatever happened to WPP's Everymile, are they still in business? "
Crafty the only WPP I know of is the comms and media group, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WPP_plc
Which WPP are you talking about ?
As something of a Matt naysayer its only fair to acknowledge the valid points Canary 3 and others have made about the improvement in governance and company structure that have occurred since the chairmans appointment. Whilst I have no understanding of how much of this is his doing I doubt it is all just a coincidence.
Onward and upwards to one and all
“There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics"
When/if I get the time I will demonstrate how misleading that 42% click bait headline is because the essence of being a listed business means you could go out of business, you could merge with another business (UK listed or not UK listed), you could be taken over by another business (see merged) you could be taken private by MBO or private equity group and yes indeed you could indeed move your listing to another market if you and your shareholders thought that was the right thing to do.
I wonder how many in percentage terms have actually listed on another market ?
Answers on a postcode to my usual nursing home ;-)
The last round of posts echo my thoughts and it's good to see the grounded logic in those posts.
From my perspective I believe 100% Matt feels his "talent" is not valued and my gut feel is one of his unstated objectives is to be wealthier and better known than John Caudewell who founded and sold phones4u for a cool £1.8 billion (perfect timing).
Matt was a long time phones4u employee.
The problem with this is there is no comparison between the two of them personality wise, sure they both have massive egos but John was as ruthless as Matt is petulant and in the business of wealth creation ruthless beats petulance every time around.
For the love of god please stop this mass exodus b****x !
You post some decent information but you seriously damage your credibility by regurgitating Matt's utterly boring and repetitive LSE bashing nonsense.
When I last asked you to provide some evidence to support these wild claims you didn't so please do us all a favour and stop it.
Ihavenoclue is 100% right to say that the SP can go and previously has gone a lot lower before and there was no takeover. Re the other poster with amnesia the 170 offer wasn't 6 months ago it was years ago and it suited all concerned that it was publicised whereas all the bids that realistically valued the business weren't made public. All you rampers need to find a different group of people to pester because the long term THG shareholders have it all and have immune to your nonsense
Crafty rest assured I will never be a "fan" of Matt's. He is so deep in goodwill deficit that even at exit at anything at close to £2 would not have me thanking him, he is an absolutely dreadful CEO, literally one of the worst and he is without any doubt the primary reason the share price is underwater for the vast majority of shareholders.
I never understood why anyone ever wanted to buy Superdry shares. Obviously this is only my opinion, but I thought their products were absolute *h*t and one of the founders, in this case James Holder was complete and utter chancer.
Its a prime example of here today, gone tomorrow disposable fashion and the best of luck to anyone trying to breathe life back into it.
Obviously THG are the manufacturer so there will be plenty in it for them :)
Maybe today is my turn to be a bit off the pace but I am confused by the above because unless I have missed something ( wouldn't be the first time) it would appear that Brighter Foods would be H&B sports snacks manufacturing partner ???
Answers on a postcard to my usual care home :-|)
Excellent post OSG. Whilst I am not an admirer of Kier Stramer I don't fear a labour government and I am quietly optimistic that they won't fall foul of the destructive in-fighting that has destroyed the Conservative party and in turn caused huge structural problems to the UK.
Honestly I think that is a difficult question to answer simply because it's probable that it would not be a clean stand alone business and by that I mean it's highly likely that nutrition will be locked into using ingenuity for X years and that some of the premises used by nutrition would be owned by Matt and leased back to nutrition and I think such "lock ins" tend to complicate accurate valuations. Whatever the value is going to be, it's going to be more than today's share price and I take comfort from that.