Member Info for yespsb

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Py37G9qsfY

@yespsb - cmon you are NEVER gonna win the lottery without a ticket - you have got to be in it to win it :)

Thats true however forever ago, I was debating whether to buy a couple of tickets because the pot was big and for some reason I felt lucky so I pulled into my local BP garage on my way home. As I pulled up on to the forecourt the odometer clicked over to read 77,777 miles. Most definitely a sign from the gods so I bought £20 worth when each ticket was a quid. I then waited with baited breath as I day dreamed about what I would do with the money.

Next day with a growing sense of anticipation I checked my 20 tickets, somehow most didn't have a single correct number and the handful that did only ever had 1 or 2. I think that put me off the lottery for good :-)

"I'm expecting a RNS tomorrow or maybe the day after"

And I am expecting to win the UK lottery, the lottery I never buy a ticket for but hey we can all dream ;-)

btw no one quite pulls off the "smacked ****" face like matt does --- cheer up matt, you have a personal fortune that's way beyond your capability so smile and be grateful for your lot ;-)

Thanks for the links guys. If I had seen that and been a WPP shareholder I would have honestly sold the same day. WPP should stick to their proverbial knitting and stop dabbling areas that they have no expertise in or require huge amounts of investment over many years as we all know only too well

" Whatever happened to WPP's Everymile, are they still in business? "

Crafty the only WPP I know of is the comms and media group, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WPP_plc

Which WPP are you talking about ?

" Whatever happened to WPP's Everymile, are they still in business? "

Crafty the only WPP I know of is the comms and media group, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WPP_plc

Which WPP are you talking about ?

As something of a Matt naysayer its only fair to acknowledge the valid points Canary 3 and others have made about the improvement in governance and company structure that have occurred since the chairmans appointment. Whilst I have no understanding of how much of this is his doing I doubt it is all just a coincidence.

Onward and upwards to one and all

“There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics"

When/if I get the time I will demonstrate how misleading that 42% click bait headline is because the essence of being a listed business means you could go out of business, you could merge with another business (UK listed or not UK listed), you could be taken over by another business (see merged) you could be taken private by MBO or private equity group and yes indeed you could indeed move your listing to another market if you and your shareholders thought that was the right thing to do.

I wonder how many in percentage terms have actually listed on another market ?

Answers on a postcode to my usual nursing home ;-)

The last round of posts echo my thoughts and it's good to see the grounded logic in those posts.

From my perspective I believe 100% Matt feels his "talent" is not valued and my gut feel is one of his unstated objectives is to be wealthier and better known than John Caudewell who founded and sold phones4u for a cool £1.8 billion (perfect timing).

Matt was a long time phones4u employee.

The problem with this is there is no comparison between the two of them personality wise, sure they both have massive egos but John was as ruthless as Matt is petulant and in the business of wealth creation ruthless beats petulance every time around.

Zzzzzzzzzzz 🥱

For the love of god please stop this mass exodus b****x !

You post some decent information but you seriously damage your credibility by regurgitating Matt's utterly boring and repetitive LSE bashing nonsense.

When I last asked you to provide some evidence to support these wild claims you didn't so please do us all a favour and stop it.

Ihavenoclue is 100% right to say that the SP can go and previously has gone a lot lower before and there was no takeover. Re the other poster with amnesia the 170 offer wasn't 6 months ago it was years ago and it suited all concerned that it was publicised whereas all the bids that realistically valued the business weren't made public. All you rampers need to find a different group of people to pester because the long term THG shareholders have it all and have immune to your nonsense

Crafty, your entitled to air your opinion and I have no issue with you being a fan of Matt's, each to their own and all that stuff

Crafty rest assured I will never be a "fan" of Matt's. He is so deep in goodwill deficit that even at exit at anything at close to £2 would not have me thanking him, he is an absolutely dreadful CEO, literally one of the worst and he is without any doubt the primary reason the share price is underwater for the vast majority of shareholders.

I never understood why anyone ever wanted to buy Superdry shares. Obviously this is only my opinion, but I thought their products were absolute *h*t and one of the founders, in this case James Holder was complete and utter chancer.

Its a prime example of here today, gone tomorrow disposable fashion and the best of luck to anyone trying to breathe life back into it.

In my defence I went on to the Brighter Foods website and scan read through the "who we section" but must have missed the bought by THG bit. Thanks for clearing that up

Obviously THG are the manufacturer so there will be plenty in it for them :)

Maybe today is my turn to be a bit off the pace but I am confused by the above because unless I have missed something ( wouldn't be the first time) it would appear that Brighter Foods would be H&B sports snacks manufacturing partner ???

Answers on a postcard to my usual care home :-|)

Dpws500 kudos to you - thats got my day off to a happy start :-)

Apparently God loves a tryer even if I don't