Member Info for yespsb

Fair point re my obvious dislike of Moulding - if you look back I started off mildly positive to him. That drifted into being neutral and now I am definitely in the "no Moulding" camp.

FWIW I think the business is worth more than the SP indicates however I doubt it will ever realise it's true value wilst the current woeful CEO is in charge. No one with any experience trusts anything he says and it follows to have the confidence to invest in a business you also have to a lot of confidence in the CEO.

Crafty you are the very last person on planet earth I would confide in. I am under zero obligation to you or anyone else to disclose how I was in a position to state this when I did. I know you think you own the THG forum just like Moulding thinks he owns the THG group but you are both wrong and you both need reminding of this from time to time.

Crafty in another 50/0 scenario its a tough call to know which I be the happiest to see the back of, my THG holding or your non stop fan boy Moulding worshipping. The very fact that you refuse to apologise when catoragorically proven to be wrong marks you as a bit of childish brat so on balance it will be you and your ramping I will most happy to wave goodbye to

Its a 50/50 split between you and crafty as to who is the most repetitive.

This my last comment on this as I am not paid to post my thoughts every 5 minutes.

Crafty desperately wants you to believe him, I on the other hand I am not troubled by fact that you might not agree with some or all I think and post, in the final analysis there just opinions.

So my final comment on this thread is this. Do you believe Crafty when he states there are only 3 nutrition companies in Europe and North America that someone like Unilever could partner with and out of the 3 THG's nutrition is the clear and obvious best choice ???

The problem in signing up a meaningful partner is Moulding insistence of having the last word, it always Mouldings way or no way as the well respected and powerful Apollo found out to their cost.

Standing back from all the for/against THG noise if you were a Unilever or anyone of the other global brands and you wanted to strike a long term strategic partnership in the beauty or nutrition sector you have a huge amount of choice in Europe and North America.

So the question then becomes obvious, what are the unique reasons you would chose to partner with THG rather A.N.Other ? Ingenuity isn't it because for all its investment and Mouldings drum beating the facts are simple, its not winning enough third party business and therefore its current go to market proposal isn't good enough and then there's the Moulding factor to take into account.

I am not for one moment suggesting there's not value in partnering with beauty or nutrition, but right now I struggling to see a compelling case for selecting THG ahead of others.

I am telling you that to be taken seriously you need to avoid calling people you don't know liars and when you make such a glaring mistake as you did with me you apologise and move on.

You have all the pig head stupid arrogance of Moulding, your never ending ramping isn't working as the share price downward momentum has increased since you started bombarding this forum with your propaganda.

Your beloved CEO has destroyed the value of the business and every time he rants on LinkedIn the share price drop accelerates so maybe the pair of you should do the share price a favour and strongly consider keeping quiet

Btw Crafty remember calling me a liar more than once when I said nutrition had not started the year as hoped and was finding sales growth challenging ?

I suppose Jefferies who recently met with the company and reported the same as I stated over a month ago are also liars ?

NO

Spot on banned, apart from a couple of halfwits, everyone saying positive stuff about Iain Mc has a thinly disguised reason for saying positive stuff.

If the truth and free speech are the first causalities of war, the question who is Moulding at war with other than LSE ?

Dark humour at its best 👏

It will comee good in a bigger and better fashion without the deceitful vain glorious fool of CEO in charge.

Some well rounded opinions in the previous posts, it only matters to me what I think of Moulding, no one else should care.

I don't think there is another UK share that generates such strong opinions and that's entirely down to Moulding and his man/child behaviour. I currently lean towards Okes view that Moulding will fight to the death to keep control of his "THG train set" but I would be delighted to be wrong.

Thats more than enough from me, I hope you all enjoy a good weekend

On a lighter note it's funny to see the LSE software block the old gunners manager first name - hence my use of gunners ;-)

The whole LinkedIn post is infantile and the picture and emojis are indeed cringe worthy.

As is his way he is at the forefront of the photo with his tee shirt sleeve deliberately pushed up and a can in his hand to grip just to make his bicep look as big as possible.

What an huge embarrassment he is any discerning observer and to think he is the CEO :-(

" So has anything changed" ???

Regrettably I think the answer is no, I imagine his advisor fees will be equal to his non director fees and he will continue to have a say in how the business moves forward. It has a distinctly "smoke & mirrors" feel to it and I think you summed it up perfectly when you said it's a ploy to avoid AGM aggro.

"In 2005/6 the Internet was only for geeks" says the man with a very selective memory.

Obviously the above is complete and utter nonsense and yet another example of why he should shut his mouth and try to focus on delivering shareholder value.

The RBS states McDonald is not seeking re appointment. That's positive news, I wish Moulding would do like wise :-)

I am a Darktrace shareholder as technology and in particular security tech is my thing. I always had confidence it would overcome the shorting propaganda.