Member Info for yespsb

More of the later and far less of the former

Its rubbing salt in an open wound. He should be replaced not given a huge pay rise.

I don't hate him, I have never meet him and I have never come close to saying that.

I strongly dislike his utter disdain for private investors, ditto his belief that its 100% his business and he will do what he wants irrespective of what any PI might say. And I think its only natural for any PI to be dissatisfied with any CEO of a quoted company who has clearly told the investor relationship department to ignore every single PI enquiry, these people are our employees as well as his but they are under "soviet style" instructions not to communicate with PI's ! How can you defend that behaviour ? Its wrong on every single level.

Crafty why do you slavishly praise Matt yet in a post below state unequivocally that the CEO and what he says (or doesn't say) has no affect on the SP ? Someone said you were being naive in stating this. I believe that your not naive, I think your disingenuous.

I think by now its clear to one and all that you are somehow connected to Matt and THG. I don't care what your connection is but I do care about the truth and your Matt/THG propaganda is nothing more that, 100% pure propaganda.

In my opinion the largest negative factor impacting the SP is Matt Moulding and I guarantee you if Matt was replaced by someone decent, free from Matt's influence the SP will rocket upwards.

Matt might be many good things but he is a train crash of CEO of a quoted company and that wouldn't change by listing on the NY exchange, he far too emotive, far too vain, far too childish to head up any quoted business.

I can assure anyone who is remotely interested I have one account on here and this is it. The fact that I agree with certain posters more than others is just the way it is. I am open about my belief that Matt is not cut out to be the CEO of a public company, I am also open about the fact that there a lot of potential in THG if there was a way to either a) get Matt to behave in interests or all shareholders or b) force Matt to the side.

I invested in the belief the shares would reach 180, belief turned into hope and every month the hope fades and I am now resigned to the fact it's going to be 6-12 months before the SP is >£1 at which point I will sell at put this frustrating experience down to poor research on my behalf

Crafty if you're not employed in political sector then you should be. You never directly answer a question, in fact you tend to "answer" a question with a question, often deflecting the discussion in a different direction.

What I think we know is.

1) you hate the London exchange and I am neither positive or negative towards it.

2) You love Matt Moulding and think he is something special, I don't care for him, I think he is an absolutely awful CEO and I wish I had applied more research before buying so many shares.

3) in keeping with thinking Matt's a good guy you seem think he is ok guy for other senior executived to do business with whereas I think his "control freak" behaviour combined with his huge ego will put a great number of potential tier 1 gobal partners off.

4) you think one or more divisions will list on a different exchange this year probably, NY and I don't think that will happen. I think Matt is bluffing and its nothing more than a tactic to take our focus away from the true performance of the business.

5) you seem to think the business is worth >£3 a share and I think it's worth alot less although the final price to a buyer would depend on the synergy and fit.

And after saying all of above we are both shareholders, both want to see the business proper, both want to see long term holders rewarded for their outstanding patience and support. Where we differ is you appear confident of a payday and I am not and on balance I should sell up if/when there is an improvement in the SP. Irrespective of my frustrations with a lot of what you post I wish you all the best

Yesimabeliever thanks for your reply and here's the thing, for the most part I agree with you. The LSE companies are weighted too much towards old money and not enough is being done to encourage modern business to list in the UK. It's in need of a major overhaul but doesn't seem to be in a hurry to do this, preferring to kick the can down the street ( shades of MM splitting the divisions and listing on another market)

The bit I have mixed feelings about is how much take over/take out activity there will be and whether that activity will improve the rest of the market

Bloody useless spell / grammar correction 🙄

Obviously UK was typed as USA but somehow was "flipped" into UK. So for clarity, any one of the existing three THG divisions completes a listing on the New York exchange in 2024 I will donate a £100 to a charity of your and if none of them do you donate a £100 to a charity I support

Crafty the worse the SP gets, the worse your posts become and this never ending LSE bashing is at best naive and at its worst the signs of mad man watching his funds disappear.

If the vast majority of LSE listed companies were as poorly valued as you suggest then you would have smart global investors buying them out left, right & centre but they are not are they? The big global players are awash with money to invest. Berkshire Hathaway for example is sitting on a cash pile of over $160 billion so why is Berkshire Hathaway and their ilk not snapping up all these UK bargains, maybe they aren't bargains simply more accurately valued than the majority of American listed businesses and I here's a little wager £100 to a charity of your choice if any of 3 divisions completes a UK listing in 2024. If they don't I let you which charity of mine I would like your £100 donation to go to.

We are shareholders in name only and that's the cold hard reality of the situation. Matt Moulding.has nothing but contempt for each and every one of us

I don't know if you have been in a Curry's recently? I avoid the place at all costs based on previous negative experiences however recently I had to take a friend who liked and wasn't well enough to drive.

Huge floor space, quite a lot of staff, usual mix of good/bad/ indifferent but their prices were high and the choice no more than okish.

My gut reaction was this must be losing a lot of money, I wonder if the other Curry's warehouses are as bad.

It is Steve 🙄 There's still a lot of work to do to break up through the 50 day moving average

Soletrader you have sympathy. Without a shadow of doubt UK fishing industry was sold a complete and utter pack of lies, but their not alone, the whole thing was one huge charade

Schlemiel - wow that's one big basis you are lugging around. Nearly all politicians lie ( remember the absolutely bare faced lies promoted by Brexit supporters) and the few truly honest MPs never get close to the top jobs in any party.

As for rejoining Europe, well let's see but if we do start negotiations on this we start from a weakened position

I will take your Robot malware and raise you with a classic rendition of

https://youtu.be/YAMYsNe7DMQ?feature=shared

50 day MA not the 5 day MA unless your Tony the tiger 🙂

The share price increasing on a steady basis and about to break through the 5day MA resistance 😵‍💫

"I'm expecting demand for THG products to stay strong in spite of overall macro - it's not like beauty and nutrition are discretionary spend"

It isn't until such time as it is and whilst that is stating the blindingly obvious there a very few things today that you can guarantee won't get caught up in the cost living squeeze so I wouldn't be so sure that THG sales won't get hit.

That's an outstanding find - big thanks for posting it 👍

What ever next ? maybe riled tiger if we don't respect his infinite wisdom 🙃