Member Info for Yanis2005

Now, back to the piles.

Anybody have any idea what they are for? Could be for anything, from a small building to process equipment. I wonder if they are for the foundations of the storage tanks arriving early Jan.

BV, is my question just gone up straight after my email. :)

My IQ is now up, slightly altered but the essence of the questions is there. Looks like GL acted on this quickly now, excellent, thanks.

I wanted to get the questions in so that they are answered this month.

My IQ (having been posted twice) is not up yet, so I emailed it to Angus/GL.

Planning revision

This article has just been posted by Drill or Drop:
https://drillordrop.com/2021/12/23/angus-energy-seeks-consent-to-reconfigure-saltfleetby-gas-site/

This introduces a few issues that could now hinder first gas at SFB; revised planning as well as EA approval.

Could you please clarify the following:

1. EA application: power generation has now been increased to 4 generators, there are only only 3 generators in the EA application. Also the change in condensate stabilisation package shown in the revised Planning application may not be reflected in the EA application. Obviously, the EA application needs to be revised. Is Angus in communication with the EA? Is EA already aware of this and the application revision will be a formality? When do we now expect EA approval?

2. Flare design has changed. But since the flare at site arrived recently and is being installed, is this flare the correct one or does it need to be replaced?

3. What is the revised 1st gas deadline?

BV, found it.

There is an order for three units with GCL; two 750 kw reciprocating compressors and one 1000 kw power generator.

The reciprocating compressors are the 1st and 2nd stage compressors that send the gas to TGC/NGG.

The power generator must be one of the four power generating units - I wonder who got the order for the other three? Refurbished?

Both orders are nicely dated and delivery in Jan/Feb as per last RNS is good. All we now need is the approvals.

BV, have you got a link?

Afternoon BV, the piles are for the foundations and the civil works for the process plant have not started yet.

For the gas compressors does it say when the order was placed or delivery expected?

The SP seems to be holding quite well at this level and I think most of the placing shares havre gone. Fingers crossed we’ll hear approvals news soon.

Who was it? Own up - who just bought 1 million shares?

My question asked on the 24th is not up, so I reposted it:

Planning revision

This article has just been posted by Drill or Drop:
https://drillordrop.com/2021/12/23/angus-energy-seeks-consent-to-reconfigure-saltfleetby-gas-site/

This introduces a few issues that can now hinder first gas at SFB; revised planning as well as EA approval.

Could you please clarify the following:

1. EA application: power generation has now been increased to 4 generators, there are only only 3 generators in the EA application. Also the change in condensate stabilisation package shown in the revised Planning application may not be reflected in the EA application. Obviously, the EA application needs to be revised. Is Angus in communication with the EA? Is EA already aware of this and the application revision will be a formality? When do we now expect EA approval?

2. Flare design has changed. But since the flare at site arrived recently and is being installed, is this flare the correct one or does it need to be replaced?

3. What is the revised 1st gas deadline?

Thank you and Happy Christmas wishes to the Angus Team

Happy Christmas all.

Happy Christmas all.

Happy Christmas all.

Planning revision

This article has just been posted by Drill or Drop:
https://drillordrop.com/2021/12/23/angus-energy-seeks-consent-to-reconfigure-saltfleetby-gas-site/

This introduces a few issues that can now hinder first gas at SFB; revised planning as well as EA approval.

Could you please clarify the following:

1. EA application: power generation has now been increased to 4 generators, there are only only 3 generators in the EA application. Also the change in condensate stabilisation package shown in the revised Planning application may not be reflected in the EA application. Obviously, the EA application needs to be revised. Is Angus in communication with the EA? Is EA already aware of this and the application revision will be a formality? When do we now expect EA approval?

2. Flare design has changed. But since the flare at site arrived recently and is being installed, is this flare the correct one or does it need to be replaced?

3. What is the revised 1st gas deadline?

Thank you and Happy Christmas wishes to the Angus Team.

FFS guys, forget Lidsey for now —— focus on SFB. Please stop throwing dead cuts it distract from the important issue which is SFB.

Had a quick look through the planning docs. I think an IQ is warranted.

1. Condensate: condensate storage was always present at side (coming out of the 3-phase separator), the condensate stabilisation package is new. However, this package is in the EA application, so not sure what has changed here.

2. Flare: I didn’t find anything to indicate what the revised maximum flow is, is not stated. However, since the flare at site arrived recently and is being installed is probably the correct flare. We need confirmation.

3. Power generation: now increased to 4 generators, is only 3 generators in the EA application.

We need some clarification on this as the EA application will very likely need to be revised. Is Angus in communication with the EA? Is EA already aware of this and the application revision will be a formality?

What is the revised 1st gas deadline?

Nom, thanks, I’ll take a look.

HITS, I don’t see the link, could you post it please? Thanks.

Morning BV, The process plant was being designed for 10 MMSFD capacity from the beginning as far as I know and I am not aware of Angus stating that the plant will operate at a higher capacity. Unfortunately the new flare capacity is not mentioned in the DoR article. Maybe an IQ is warranted?

Flares can be of different designs, even horizontal, I am not fully familiar with the flare design but I would guess the height pops out of the flare calculations, to minimise emissions.

HITS, we don’t know yet whether the flare on site is not the right one. Also, the generator being one of the standard Caterpillar range is not that difficult to source, they may even be able to get a second hand one. My main concern remains timely EA approval.

I am wondering whether the flare at site is indeed the correct one..

For the generators is it possible that site power requirements were underestimated necessitating the need for an additional generator? No space at the existing generator location hence the move?

If this planning approval is a non-issue, then it should be received early January.

I don’t think EA had anything to do with this change and I wonder what the impact of this will be on the EA decision timing.

https://drillordrop.com/2021/12/23/angus-energy-seeks-consent-to-reconfigure-saltfleetby-gas-site/

Applying fort a planning permission now?