O/T An Alternative market?21 Nov 2018 21:14
Reading HtL's earlier post (when HUR was sub-40p) has got me pondering. He said:
"It appears to be the case these days, more so in the AIM, that few shares are ever allowed to achieve “fair value”. Every rise of any significance is sold into..."
Presumably the stock market was invented to allow more people to easily invest in a company and to allow people of vision to raise the funds needed to achieve an industrial ambition beyond the means of any one person's pocket?
I've been wondering lately if rapid speculation on shares is, overall, a good or bad thing for our economy. As a long term holder I feel I have the moral high ground over a day-trader or shorter. I can also see that I may be deluding myself and we are all in the same cess pit together trying to collect unearned income.
It does feel like there are two things going on the market. One is the aforementioned investment in a company that one thinks has prospects and the other is a fleet-footed, opportunistic smash & grab at the expense of "mug punters" like me. Again, I may be kidding myself.
I wonder would an alternative market be possible which created a "dampening" effect on high speed trading? Perhaps by making it impossible to sell a share within 2 weeks ( or 2 days, or 2 hours) of buying it. Or by introducing punitive fees on trades, related to their value at trading time?
Might it be possible to create a "Long Term" market or index where investment strategies were planned over months & years rather than minutes & days?
Not sure what exactly I'm groping at in my ignorant musing. I just seems as if allowing money to flow faster and faster around the globe, towards perceived opportunity or away from perceived threat, at ever accelerating speeds, it likely to create more, rather than less, chaos for us all.