Member Info for Willy88

Cevodniya...for someone with issues re spelling your post quotes £130 without the 'm' I'm guessing, followed by your next sentance which itself is full of errors. Pot..kettle.

Please explain TheExang...how does he know where the £500m is going?

Ditto 21ATS....He's unreal!!

Well said Skier though perhaps rather strong wording, however Potential2 is completely OTT and extremely repetitive, to the extent that any savvy investor would be put off by his constant 'push'. Sounds like he's part of Vault? Same kina 'pushers' over on ALRT too. Most attract punters rather than investors, but hey, share dealing is open to all and many forget that.

Yes, I do my homework Marco/Jolly. I just commented that Mister was OTT sprouting 'double fiqures' when MRE lands....lets see. Happy if it happens but I'm not sure we will reach those heights just yet.

Mister..please explain why double figures?? MRE will be 'indicated' resourse, not 'inferred'!

A bit OTT Jolly but i love your enthusiaum...

Medjed. Would suspension on both Indicies spell danger re license renewal?

Yes MisterP but more realistically, at what price will we be taken out and when, because it will happen!

Daltry. Please can you clarify your suggestion that SH's are not kept up to date by REE. If you look at the RNS list and I'm guessing you done so, what more news would you expect to hear at the current time?

Read the posts Overhyped from those with mining investment experience rather than the 'punters'. There are a few sensible posts here from people who know the real situation. This could be a great investment however there is some way to go yet!

Gggg21...not sure what you are referring to? Wrong about? Whoever had invested it had a not nice small about it, however I understand the risk. Do you?

On 10th March SML raised £4.7m at 3.5p a share at a c17% discount to the average price on 18th March. Have we asked ourselves why? If this share was about to move upwards to the 6p and 7p's in the short term the subscription surely made sure it would not. I repeat my view that the board were in receipt of all the MRE stats at that time.

While may SH's here are getting carried away can I please point out that this MRE is based on an 'Inferred resource'. A heck of a lot more drilling is required prior to the resource becoming 'indicated'. There is still a high percentage of risk at this stage and the subscription price is confirming that point. Even following the next leg up to an indicated resource, it needs to then move on to being a 'measured' resource. There is the planing/ local issues to consider too and a potential buy out along the way.

It's a project worth consideration but beware. The subscription sent a message and those who understand 'early stage' mining investments will have a similar opinion to me.

We do not even know who the investor was. Another big ? mark for me and very cleverly kept just under the reporting threshold.

Explorer...so now you are starting to understand...

Ontarget...respectfully, I think you dont understand how the market works! Trying to be polite!! That was the red flag for many investors...(the sale of £4.7m shares at 3.5p)

Anxiety...i did mention in a note yesterday that many posters here do not fully understand mining investments. It's really very early doors here and that's why the 'bigger investors' are not yet in, apart from the strange deal that sold £4.7m of shares at 3.5p. That was the warning. If the SP post MRE was estimated to be 7p to c10p as some people stated here, why did SML sell those shares at 3.5p, and just two weeks ago? Why?, because there is an awful lot of water to pass under the bridge before extraction and quite a lot prior to the PFS. The news in the local media will do much to stir up the locals, both for and against the project. Many mining investments never get to actual product extraction or indeed it takes many years to commence actually mining. Many projects get sold off along the way too. So, if you're a trader you need to be smart and if you are a LTH, you have to calculate investment v time v risk. However after reading many posts here there are lots of traders and as some have suggested rather distatefully, bed wetters.

Supra3...whats the difference between a trader and a knicker wetter? Everyone has the right to trade and invest however they wish. There are many excited shareholders here though a lot of unrealistic short term aspirations too. Mining shares are complex. E.g. The expert opinion states a lower base of US$ 0.88b. This is Cornwall too where there will be various legal and regulatory issues and perhaps areas of non extraction. The PFS will address some of those issues. Again I would remind investors here that only a few weeks ago a £4.7m investment was accepted by the board at 3.5p. They would have obviously been aware of some of the info contained within today's MRE. Even if this project is fast tracked, we are still years away from income. Zeus and others will shortly set a fair price and as we know from history, it can take a while to reach that level.

Forensic...am I correct in suggesting that the use of the word 'transformational' need not apply to sbort term?

What interests me is why would you sell £4.7m worth of shares at 3.5p if you thought the SP was about to double or treble? I understand 'the carrot' element ...however....

Sorry Boom.... I was referring to Mauv and the statement that ...'we were led to believe that the deal was done and price set'. I've never seen anything to support that statement and I simply asked Mauv where this information was noted?

Warrie. Agree that Nasdaq is where one needs to be however stating the the OCT is no good because ALRT and CapAi did not attract investors there is rather 'wide of the mark'. REE is a completely different opportunity. The two Co's you mention are 'punts' at best.