Cobus Loots, CEO of Pan African Resources, on delivering sector-leading returns for shareholders. Watch the video here.
Antha
‘Whispering "$50 million sat in an escrow" if that is what you believe and it's been in their ready to be paid out for well over a year now but Amit has so far refused to then surely that in it self is fraud?‘
Can’t untick the boxes, of what shareholders have been lead to believe…
10/10 for perception
$50 million sat in an escrow account Spike… so says the CEO of Cloudtag … also UK FCA registered director of SB Corporate Finance - used for raising funds… for guess where?
Hard to untick these boxes one thinks …
Deeply misleading? I very much doubt it
Nevertheless you can - and no doubt- will continue to try
Spike
‘there is not much point talking about UK regulatory requirements, FCA etc, as cloudtag is *not* a UK company.’
I’m going to repeat what’s been previously discussed for the benefit of other shareholders reading this.
If I Joe Bloggs were to decide I wanted to purchase shares in a company called ‘Cloudtag’, fully understanding the risk v reward scenario, should I require some kind of assurance that the CEO was legit, then knowing this for a fact would perhaps give me some peace of mind.
By his own recently adjusted bio, he is claiming expertise in risk and regulatory compliance.
Amit as a UK citizen, also recently FCA regulated (until August 2023) as a senior director and money laundering reporting officer, and still a FCA registered a director of a UK finance company - SB Corporate Finance Ltd.
It matters to me not what you think in respect… you’re entitled to your opinions.
Spike…
Cage rattled once again?
Play the subject not the person… no?
Antha, never mind all of that, just spell check my post… before the spelling police come checking
The problem is Soyo, in essence many shareholders are angry and looking for verification that what is said on the website is the truth.
Amit in the past hasn’t helped himself… who can argue?
Re the removal of the banks’ identity today, (perhaps given in the first instance to calm certain shareholders) to also companies removed where Amit has had previous association. Then they’re perhaps fed up with shareholders taking extreme action contacting/searching/being a nuisance for said verification.
Nevertheless, it doesn’t necessarily mean that recent updates /deals have absolutely no truth.
As usual it’s either take a stand, or wait it out. You have a choice
Lol… trust you :)
Couldn’t be bothered to change it … !
More likely is a breech of regulations
Tweaks to the site map haven’t gone unnoticed… again today relating to ‘the agents’
Perhaps it’s his way reiterating what has already been said on in the updates
If you’re reading this Amit… you shouldn’t be!! You’ve more important stuff to be getting on with
Seems a mammoth task for one person.
FCA Registered… or regulated (or perhaps not as the case now maybe) given regulatory compliance varies throughout jurisdictions… UK, EU also the US.
It’s why I thought agents acting on behalf of the company seemed more likely ?
Spike…
‘(I note that whispering did not deny that he is either amit, or being paid by amit.)’
It’s a resounding No… unfortunately I’m seeing no financial benefits from Amit whatsoever, and I am certainly not he
‘lol’ Dougie?
I’ll have you know these are indeed serious questions… :)
‘It is totally wrong to then try impose the suggestion that the reason Amit Ben-Haim’s distribution agent can not proceed is due to ‘regulatory requirements’ &/or ‘strict adherence to NDA guidelines’..’
Then … who are the paying agents, also why wouldn’t agree Amit agree a conference call with the shareholder who’d specifically asked for verification that the agents do exist.
Given that Amit now has shareholders details and can tally with the official share register, presumably… another one to ponder…?
Under the umbrella of regulatory compliance/NDA’s… gagging orders?
* disclosure of the buyers.. by the agents
Interesting Dougie
Would disclosure of agents have to be given to pi’s and brokers when payment is made?
I have no clue
Just your average shareholder (invested in ctag), who likes to challenge and understand all avenues. :)
Then there’s the subject of a NDA…
What it means exactly in respect of adherence rules, regulations and laws.
Managing shareholders expectations within boundaries.
I’m not suggesting for one minute Amit has broken any laws. Though by his own recently adjusted bio, he is claiming ‘regulatory compliance’. As a recently regulated (until August 2023) senior director and money laundering reporting officer, shareholders would expect openness and honesty in his updates.
The lack of such in recent times has brought about uncertainty and confusion with shareholders. If he can’t meet his own timescales then what is one supposed to think?
Not one person who is a shareholder wants all of this controversy, this much I’m pretty sure
SFO wouldn’t take kindly to any such breeches from a UK registered individual with ‘expertise in risk and regulatory compliance’. Which he no doubts knows, hence his adjustment to his bio
All the more reason for Amit to pay shareholders the $50 million he allegedly has sat in escrow… asap
Let me spell it out Spike…
‘Regulatory compliance’… which means what exactly, if breeched?
You can lead a horse to water…
‘The company remains under a strict NDA … ‘
‘April 2024.... nowt.’
Though… not exactly nowt, because just today the adjustment on the website to his bio, re ‘expertise in risk and regulatory compliance’ suggests we perhaps were barking up the right tree in reference to him being a UK citizen, registered (though not currently regulated) with the FCA… with a gagging order to boot…
I must use the correct terminology, note to ones self … NDA