Member Info for WeTookPelham

@TommyFlower "...they have allowed us to get to this point .... that they have made no effort to regularly and effectively communicate with shareholders proves to me that they are really not up to the task of running a publicly listed pharma."

"...I wonder if we have enough shares between us to call for an EGM and shuffle up the board a bit ...."

Both bang on...well said, particularly communication with shareholders has been atrocious IMO. One good example is managing sentiments and expectation, e.g. CRUK, why not manage expectations before the announcement, not an RNS straight afterwards "lauding" not winning it. I could go on RE the terrible communication.
IMO i think the current languishing of the SP is down to the CRUK result, (obv city financial big factor too) , but had they managed the expectations better, been less vague, the current "sentiment" would not be as low...again IMO.

I hope(assume?) they have rabbit to pull out of the hat soon????? They need to!

An EGM would be good. But I'm sure the BOD are so relieved that the AGM isn't anytime soon, they'd be torn to shreds.

Has anyone who emails the BOD got any useful recent input?

Hi C7, as per my 11.06 post, one of the 5.57p's is definitely a buy.

...The 8,915 trade is definitely a buy.

...here atm...where is everyone?

RE RNS's again..they were super quick to issue one about "losing" out in a competition (i.e. CRUK) even though apparently it was never even a big deal to them in the first place! Which IMO, did nothing but depress the share price ever since.
I really really don't understand Scancells logic on what news they decide to publicise/RNS??
The tin foil hat wearing conspiracy nutter in me almost makes me think it's a deliberate ploy to depress the SP???

The 7,122 is mine, definitely a buy, seems very rude not to at this price and especially with todays news of the patent confirmation.

Agree with Tommy, very odd IMO no RNS, very significant news is it not?

P.s. many thanks Konar (again)for your post earlier RE the patent news.

Thanks, Tommy, that makes sense, much appreciated. Lets hope there is a deal in parallel then!

Tommy - you said "...I think it is crucial in the patents are granted and that does not trigger the conditions precedents on an already agreed deal...then the board are up against the clock to find a source of finance and their inaction over the last 3 months can be viewed as reckless."

Can you expand on that please for my benefit.

I'd like to think the Board aren't "that" reckless and that there is a plan on place especially in regards to BioNTech in the near term. Well I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt anyway.

Can someone just briefly clarify again the news we're due soon i.e. IND, Patent news (confirmations) etc etc.

DG, I too am a frustrated, primal screaming long term holder so I appreciate where you were coming from now, and yes this BOD (so far) haven't given us anything to shout home about.

Not particularly a lot of volume today but down 5%??

But going back to my earlier post, what are people thoughts on Tues/next week, as per how Konar laid out for us in his post yesterday?

Apologies, I got the wrong end of the stick, however isn't it all a moot point? So discussing it just fits in (and helps) with doom-mongers/traders rhetoric?

Yep talk about Project Fear, what a bunch of complete and utter nonsense spouted earlier RE recivership etc...With so much incoming news due the opposite is true. I hope no-one fell for the doom mongering. Although the current SP is an absolute joke for long term holders, a bargain for new comers mind.

Anyway, with the patent finialised(?) on Tues, as Konar suggested perhaps the news blackout has been waiting for that? A possible significant day/week??

So with everything we know, it seems the chance of something happening soon-ish between BionTech and SCLP seems very high does it not?
(P.s. Not a ramp, just a question/opinion!)

...not forgetting Genetech have money to burn, but also remembering the fact the Scancell twitter page went through a phase of (quite oddly IMO) posting tweets about Genentech, e.g. https://twitter.com/scancellpharma/status/972878333984890887

But anyway I think the synergy between Genentech, Biontech and Scancell is very strong and apparent.
Just wondered what others thought?

...still a likely suitor/partner? Wouldn't this make sense considering the collaboration Genetech already have BioNtech? Would be nice I'm sure for Genentech to have access to Scancells wares directly, under their umbrella so to speak.

Is anyone the wiser about where those 5m shares went yet?

Thanks C7/RuckRover, (I probably should have investigated that myself :-S )
But very interesting that they still have over 75% of their scancell shares but have offloaded 100% of shares in other companies they have investments in??

Have City Financial kept some Scancell?

You'll need to spell it out Farmer Sally, doubt anyone can be bothered to click on your link.

Well said Balerno. They've done nothing IMO to help give the SP some sense of stability, the opposite in fact.. IMO. Yes some will argue "it's all about the science" blah blah blah etc, but the BOD are frankly a bit of disgrace in this respect, esp with their recent healthy pay rises...again all IMO.
Their vague (and often negatively tinged) RNSs do nothing but help depress the price, and when they do some actual interesting snippets, nothing is mentioned.
And what exactly does waste of space John Chiplin do again exactly?

Typo: A paper by L. Durrant and Ruhul Choudhury entitled "Cancer vaccine: how far are we from curing cancer?"