Member Info for WeTookPelham

Ah...maybe it was just last of the big spenders RayPointer 😉

To be fair, I'm sure they have been known to precede RNS's here and on many other shares.

Coincidence or tomfoolery, you decide.

Very well said EE.

Let's not also forget...

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/nov/10/kate-bingham-well-connected-but-under-fire-uk-vaccines-chief

Https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/1060808/scancell-s-chief-scientist-hails-excellent-melanoma-data-1060808.html

"Of these, 20% achieved complete remission, with all signs of cancer disappearing. The overall disease control rate, including stable disease or tumour shrinkage, was 84%.

Additionally, 72% of patients showed significant tumour reduction, which continues to improve with time."

This.

Whilst of relavance of course, I feel the talk of the US health sec is very much overshadowing what could be a very interesting week, as miavoce says.

Yes the bigger RE US health sec picture matters, but let's worry about that "if" and when it becomes an issue.

As well as the coming week, I am much more interested in the price action last week also for example.

"Scancell

2,647 followers

2h Edited

Connect with the Scancell team during #LondonLifeSciencesWeek from 18-21 November.

Our newly appointed CEO Phil L'Huillier, CFO Sath Nirmalananthan, CMO Nermeen Varawalla and Head of BD Mandeep Sehmi are excited to meet with potential partners and investors to discuss future strategic developments to advance our off the shelf cancer vaccine programmes and highly tumour specific GlyMab® antibodies.

To schedule a meeting, direct message via LinkedIn or contact us at commercial.enquiries@scancell.co.uk

#immunooncology #vaccines #cancervaccines #precisiononcology

#JefferiesHealthcareConference"

Note the mention of Jeffries too?

RR it was more CT's post 12:37 11/11/2024 i was referring to. Not going to disagree with those points?

But seeing as you disagree with the disruptive element in 12:47 post, what about what else they said in that post?

Not necessarily that bit you refer to, however I do agree Scancell has the "potential" to be a distruptor.

But I think your good friend has summed this up nicely:

12/11/2024

"07:07 inanaco: Ruck and his darkside are in a bad mood ... you can see he is sh#t stirring on the other BB"

Yes, definitely worth a look. Excellent arguments for the bull/upside case.

Very wide spread again, just confirmed on my broker, not far off what LSE is saying i.e. 9%

Somewhat murkying the waters RE the share price?

Ah ok thanks miavoce, missed that, talk about paying a premium!

But volume of 1,522,250 assume is still correct?

!

Hi violindog, I have to respectfully disagree that Scancell have to become market leaders and especially ASAP.

Also Bermuda shorts post at 5 Nov 2024 19:13 i thought perfectly explained the comparison and how the market is vast:

"Evaxion have to rely on AI due to the nature of personalised vaccines. The tumour is analysed and they then use AI to select the best antigens to target with their vax but Scancell don't need to go through that process as they're targeting the same antigens every time for every patient. The market and the field is vast and certainly big enough for both to find a place."

Also, personally speaking I feel you have to some conviction in the companies you're invested in, at the very least. Rightly or wrongly i have a lot here.

You appear to have very little?

Lol @violindog

You sound worried (again). Perhaps you should sell your Scancell shares and buy Evaxion instead, no?

"...The Mötley fool goes say that they’ve got appointed experienced in healthcare heavyweights as directors etc why would these people join a company because they believe in the science on the way forward they clearly excited to have been joining Scancell".

Yes the Motely Fool article is terrible at best, and sinister at it's worst. As Moon party says "...motley fool is too closely connected with the AIM self-appointed cowboys and other self-pocket-lining boiler room scammers for my liking."

But do think Cleanerworld is right to emphasise the 2 x recent appointments and why they joined, I think these appointments shoud not be underplayed and are in fact very significant to the indicated direction of travel for Scancell. Also it seem's good, significant news like this seems to get washed out.

But yes, it is interesting that the FUD (Fear, uncertantity & doubt) type posts & media is on the uptick IMO.

As found by pharmaboy3 on the other forum:

https://healthandpharma.net/scib1-melanoma-treatment-dna-plasmid-vaccine

You still haven't said if you're actually invested here scinvtemp? Why won't you say?

Unlikely isn't it considering how much you hate the company?

...worried about significant delays should be selling out now and buying back later?

Or perhaps they have other motives for posting? 🤔

Many thanks Miavoce and of course Botski.

Had to repost this from Chilltime, sums up quite a few posters on here also...either one of the other IMO.

"28/10/2024

07:27 Nigel

Once again you are the most negative on the forum when feedback I’m getting is the polar opposite, highly encouraging

***Are you just the woe betide life negative type or a, subtle posting manipulative trader?

It’s one of those two."