Member Info for Warrie

I am warning you one more time Ralph, come on this board with your blatant lies I will not only report you to L.S.E I will make Defence Holdings aware of your misinformation and look at the legal angle of where else we go with your libellist claims.

You use the wording "most" retail platforms when in fact it is only 2 or 3 to my knowledge, misleading investors this early in the morning after a day in which the S.P. has dropped, it all looks like someone casting negativity for their own gains.

Idiot ,filtered

Main reforms proposed by London Stock Exchange (LSE) under its “Shaping the Future of AIM” programme, with what’s already changed / available as derogation, and what’s proposed / under consultation (likely 2026 or later). Helps give a clearer view if you follow or invest in smaller AIM-listed firms.

🧾 Area / Rule ✅ What’s changing now / via derogation or guidance 🔄 What’s on the roadmap / what may change in 2026+

Share structure / founder-friendly governance – Dual-class share structures that meet the current Main Market requirements will now be acceptable for prospective AIM companies.

Full formal embedding of dual-class share structures in updated AIM Rules.

Director remuneration / related-party protections – Where a nominated adviser (“Nomad”) is satisfied that non-standard remuneration (e.g. via share incentives, founder schemes) includes reasonable protections (e.g. good-leaver / bad-leaver terms), the Nomad will not be required to give a separate “fair and reasonable” opinion on remuneration under AIM Rule 13.

Potential wider review of related-party and remuneration disclosure rules when AIM Rulebook is redrafted, to reflect the reduced rigidity.

Transactions, acquisitions & reverse takeovers – LSE will consider derogations so that certain acquisitions (that don’t materially change business) may be treated as a “significant transaction” under Rule 12 instead of a “reverse takeover” under Rule 14 — which eases complexity.

It may also waive the requirement for full “admission document” disclosure for new classes of securities (second lines), subject to Nomad/approval.

Formal rule changes to simplify thresholds and classifications for transactions/acquisitions once the Rulebook is revised. Accounting standards & disclosure burden on listing/admissions – LSE will consider derogations for use of UK-GAAP (rather than more complex international accounting) for new admissions.

They may permit incorporation by reference of historical financial info rather than requiring full standalone admission documents.

Redrafting the full AIM admission document framework to be more proportionate (easier / cheaper) and exploring digital solutions.

Role of Nominated Advisers (Nomads) – LSE plans to reset the Nomad model: produce a consolidated technical guide clarifying adviser responsibilities; retire legacy “Inside AIM” guidance documents.

Nomads will get more autonomy under a refreshed “Qualified Executive” approval framework.

In the 2026 consultation, a full rewrite of the AIM Rules for Companies and for Nominated Advisers is expected — giving a formal, updated regulatory framework under which Nomad

Looks like there has been a mass breakout from the Asylum today.

Just topped up another 1k worth @ 1.44

I'm waiting for a surprise RNS that leaves chancers like you sitting on the fence.

Can't buy on I.G. very odd goings on considering the huge drop this morning

CapAI and ALRT recently listed on OTC, very low volumes of trading so I don't think it would help, standard market would be best.

peel are single handedly responsible for ******* the markets.

I expect to see Sharebel along any time soon,... then the S.P. will recover.

You are comparing it to Palantir, no one else is mentioning them.

Your either in here for positive news on Ixian in December and any new developments, our your here to cause uncertainty .

It never ceases to amaze me how impatient the "punters" are on these shares. In one minute out the next, like dung flies on a cowpat.

This share is most definitely off grid and most investors are unaware of its potential , yet the fortunate ones who spotted it and have invested here are happy to sell for 10% gains??,.. human nature to take profit I guess, but cashing out completely is playing Russian roulette, one good RNS with sales performance over Xmas will send WeShop sky high and WCAP will gain momentum, could leave those sellers desperately trying to buy back in.

Hindsight we all wish. I got to admit I completely cashed out of here when the RNS landed about the ATM and stayed out until the beginning of last week.

Not trying a deramp here but a word of warning, 95% of consolidations do not end up well for investors.

I got out of CapAI after doing research on this very subject just as it was reported they were going to do a 100 to 1 share swap.

Take a look at what has happened over there since the consolidation. If WSBN release remarkable assay results immediately after consolidation it won't have the devastating impact, but if there is a further delay in any positive news this share will slide all the way down to where it is now.

HarChris

Could it be that Peels selling over the last week has made them a substantial profit and they have already "rigged" the bid offers to buy back in with their profit to rinse repeat?

Magpie mate,

You did bring a light hearted post to everyone, we all need cheering up and it would be helpful if the BOD could keep some positive newsflow coming.

No way the S.P. should be down this low but it is what it is until something lights the fuse.

I have used AI because I, like many , don't have the time to trawl through page after page of legal jargon.

It's very useful if you ask in the correct context to whatever it is you are trying to find answers to.

Keep posting your views are more than welcome.

AI is only as good as the information it recieves, in the hands of idiots it is easily confused.

The pocket money petes, don't you just love them, they put in their £100 and as soon as it's made them a tenner they are cashing out, off you go and don't come back.

Matador

You are clueless , if you were here when it briefly hit 4p you would have known it took less than a nano second before it was sliding back down to mid 3p.

So there would not of been a huge amount of people buying at 4p as your leading people to believe.

Now go away and plague some other board with your misinformed postings

Nasdaq reopens today at 2.30