RE: FCA IMO, IMO17 May 2019 23:50
Evening C7
No Im not harsh on people with a pro/con opinion, Im just harsh on “trolls” (people with a constant negative opinion)
As imo, if a posters opinion is up & down, it shows they hope for the best, but get frustrated when it goes bad!
A “ troll” never seems to have a positive moment?
Hence it is a paid, or trade or some agenda opinion to try to prevent positive sentiment again & again 24/7 ?
Granted BoD are not helping themselves, but I personally feel one particularly egotistic & bloody minded one, has
the remainder “suppressed” how and why they do not resist beats me!
But, if all the comments presentations data, rns’s are to be believed, the science could well prove we have one or more tangible compounds!
Again granted, funds could have been better raised spent utilised? But if deliberate neglect is found and many have masses of this of photographic & recorded debate?
Then for the life of me, why this one particular person, doesn't try harder to work with instead of against Lth’s beats me! As just to “win” at any cost, could prove even more costly in long run!
All the lth’s want is value for there money, to see they have assisted in making cancer sufferers lives a little better longer less painful! & hopefully a return (and why shouldnt they!)
So, to class them as secondhand! To ridicule them under annonymous avatars on certain share sites, & remain pompous & arrogant is futile, as it simply spurs those on to seek retribution rather than give up!
As individually we may sound weak & incapable, but as a collective group, the shares (voting power) & funds are considerable ?
And so if IP’s only cost £5k in administration! I would imagine Lth’s could well match infact well improve on an offer to buy it, to prevent said rumour of it being taken away & leave us high n dry with nothing!
As someone mentioned earlier today! With so many angered at the current suggestion by the CEO of a “premium deal” statement, that has so far shrunk sp further & has showed NO crystallisation as yet!
This anger could well develop into a premium force to be reckoned with! As having seemingly been misdirected time after time! Many will want to hold certain people accountable for there mis-management decisions?
As what has been happening “time after time” is imo NOT (as yet) in the shareholders or Companies best interests! And easily checkable through ALL Co & supplier Co records?
So, after this monologue, why have you and several others never had a good word to say about Val, what is your true reasoning? Mine was support cancer research & hopefully a return on investment! Neither as yet have I seem either and hence my negative stance at present!
That having said, if Val does turn it around and prove us all wrong! I will be the first to send an apology for doubting! However, looking at it at present? Id say BoD owe us an explanation an apology and a huge personal buy in each! To show they will put their mone
Sign In
Follow the stocks
