RE: Urraca14 Dec 2016 09:21
Hi onewife. The Syrians were saying yesterday that the civilians didn't need to be evacuated. If the fighting troops leave, and the battle is over, they are not in danger. If they consider themselves part of the opposition to Assad, then I guess thy will want to go. As far as getting on the buses, just they're bound to be concerned. But rebels have been transported to Ibdid before, without harm. Assad needs to do this, otherwise the country will descend into worse chaos. He's not strong enough, even with Russia and Iran, to hold all of Syria down by force. Far too many weapons knocking about. And I presonally believe that Saudi and Iran want to move on from their proxy wars - Russia definately wants them to, as shown by the OPEC deal, which Putin brokered. They have all been hurt by low pil prices, sanctions in Iran too. They face political problems on their home turf if they don't maintain oil at a higher price.
On EU sanctions, its the only leverage the EU have on the situation. They were introduced to undermine Assad and lead to his downfall. Miliband leading the vote to stop UK intervention, which prompted Obama's decision not to do anything much, and the usual EU indecision, means the sanctions were pretty much all we did. Okay, a bit of covert aid to the rebs. And we have utterly failed in getting rid of Assad. Now we need to be realistic, and the refugee crisis is politically top of the agenda in the EU. Stabilising the situation should be paramount. EU, in concert with America, Russia, Saudi and Iran should all be pressing for a federal constitution in Syria, allowing rebels and Kurds some self determination in their respective territories, in return for joining together against the shared enemy which is ISIS.
This could all happen pretty quickly once lame duck Obama goes and Trump becomes Pres. Give it a couple of months.