Member Info for Uptheladder

Lucky us then

@ SPAWNY 100

mine are not in isa or sipp I only use 212 because I can buy small but regular amounts of shares , and yes I do realise about the spread , but it suits my situation GLA

@ RT003

I also received full amount from 212

Brixton @ 17 12

totally agree with the last word ,he defo is .

GZ

both are within ULEZ zone so diesel car must be euro 6 engine to go to hackney and stamford hill , Kent still ok as long as its outside M25 from sometime in August or once again euro 6 engine

oh dear Debden boy getting angry,

totally agree about khan , I heard the idiot saying he was pro consultation the other day , yeah right and then do the **** whatever he wants anyway whether people agree or not as in the case of ulez ,

Gazzleberry
I agree with the first part of your reply , regarding PPE I don't really know what the opposition parties knew or in fact did not know , my comments were made because another posted commented on the tories covid policies , I just wanted to point out that all parties in Westminster supported them , in other words they're all in the boat together . glad to see lloyds has finally broken through the 50p barrier again , hopefully we will see a decent dividend ,

I agree about the PPE, that was an own goal and of course action should be taken ,
am I right in thinking that all the opposition parties at the time of the pandemic supported the government policies ,

same old ,same old 21 posts today out of 82 very sad do you not have family or friends to engage with instead of anonymous posters on a share chat forum

thanks guys for your responses to my query , overall I still think I would prefer dividends in my account , although I do understand some need for buybacks , anyway got to go now GLA

Gate13boy
I agree their is some benefit to shareholder with buybacks , the benefit being a reduction in shares available , yet their is no direct financial benefit in regards as to money in the bank as with dividends , and the fact that a poster here recommends selling shares so as to gain the supposed 2.5p seems to be counter productive

I get the theory point , maybe thats what they mean by a progressive dividend outlook , they will keep buybacks going whilst increasing the dividend , we will see if thats the case ,

having read comments regarding the buybacks being worth 2.5 p to shareholders , and to realise the 2.5 value one needs to sell shares , surely that would mean shareholders are worse off as less shares means smaller dividend payment on the next dividend payout , I understand the reason to do buybacks due to the bonus and saye schemes lloyds have in place , but to significantly reduce shares in issue will take many years , so it begs the question , do lloyds banking group prefer the share price to be this low ? If so why ?

T64
glad you brought that subject up as I was wondering the same thing ,
I have never understood why they don't just hold some I treasury for the savers scheme
maybe their is some unknown benefit to LBG why they don't do it

fully expecting markets to drop tomorrow , probably a buying opportunity if you do not believe the war in Eastern Europe will escalate

machismo @20.03
you don't have to defend it , you can do whatever you want , but its clear the only reason none of you do defend it, is because you can't
if you know that why do you keep asking the same question , you call them children and morons , yet continue to request the same info from the people you call names to , so if you believe Brexit cannot be defended maybe the time has come to talk about other things which relate to Lloyds banking group ,

007
not sure Berkshire are near all time lows , my portfolio shows I am way up on them , in fact 79%

maybe the UK population should have had an opportunity to vote via a referendum to join the eu instead of the politicians doing what suits them as usual . useless bunch of ******s

lol
Epro attempted to bring up Brexit with one of his first posts this morning and I thought to myself when he got blanked and nobody replied that you had worked it out , alas I was wrong cos in the end you started to engage with him on the subject, if you refuse to engage with him on the subject you will deny him the oxygen to continue on this path , say him but of course it could be a her , not meaning to be critical I have also responded in the past , but I feel its a pointless convo now as the UK are out , its a done deal