RE: Profit joke17 Apr 2023 20:21
Trisor I don't think I was arguing NNN wouldn't get funding
I was arguing NNN would run out of money in 6 months even though the RNS on 30th June said they had enough funds for at least 12 months. Lots of people saying I didn't know my **** on this one but I do and indeed was proved correct
Once NNN did the lanstead I said they would not get anywhere near the money in the RNS and indeed only on the drip, despite lots of hostile posts it took a long time to be proven correct on that one too
Once they did the Oval X deal I said the middle scenario was NNN run out of money by June, oh **** right on that one too
Now I'm telling you NNN do not have a funding agreement and you chose to believe Duffers who only give you false hope over me who has never given you a bum steer.
Im a little hurt to be honest.
You agree the RNS is open to interpretation IMO it is for a reason. It is not because the nomad and Duffers cant string a sentence together it is because without the ambiguity the SP would be even more ****ed, and I mean totally ****ed.