RE: EGM Voting16 Nov 2022 13:43
Interesting listen (I saw it at the time it was published). With the benefit of hindsight it has more holes than a swiss cheese.
1. C/ Victory sale- a damming indictment of their eagerness to egg up the value as evidenced by Ozas own mouth. (Incidently the requisition site alludes to the fact that there was, in their view, more than just 1 interested partner.
2.WN- screwed up wells & the large oil leg completely airbrushed out. We now have to rely on lab tests being transferable to actual reservoir conditions. Over exposed to this project due to their poor management.
3. Daybreak-we now find that the cash raised has disappeared with NO wells drilled. More evidence of gross mismanagement.
4.Parte-another screwed up well, trying to find a farm in partner & looking for a license extension. We now know this is on hold.
So on this basis do we think they deserve the remuneration package they currently enjoy ? I freakin don't.