Member Info for Uggy100

Far too many variables to attempt a valuation. We first need to get the freaking EWT's on the go, it's taking far tooooooo long. Pointless listening to the dynamic duo's timeframes.

miker or CB looks like BMD's tweet has been removed, what was the gist of it if you don't mind ?

Selfish

Just filter persitawt, best thing I ever did as he serves no purpose on this planet let alone this BB.

GL all real holders (so not the troll mentioned above)

Wilson

We need successful EWT's plus the volumetric's before we can begin any valuation. If the tests are good then this could be worth a ****load to RBD :)

BH whilst I agree with Malcy on this occasion to say he's never wrong is pushing it a bit lol !

cloves

I'm assuming you are responding to a persimmon post ? In all honesty I really wouldn't waste my breath.

GP, as dar as I'm aware circa 12 months ago all the permits for a EWT at WNA2 were in place. Covid issues caused disruption so the JVP's forged ahead with the B wells. As I understand it we have all the required permissions to conduct tests at both locations. Just my view of course.

persimmon

Your continued ramblings are now beyond a joke, face it, you do not hold here & your raison d'etre is purely to try to disrupt this board. Trying to convince people you hold here is laughable. I think you may need to change your meds.

Green coffin for you sunshine, you're just a royal piece of ****e,

What are you on about RNS ? Any oil produced will be tankered to a local refinery & sold, simple.

Yes persi, non producing assets are not subject to current poo. However Cali is so you're being a bit disingenuous there (as usual I might add).

Agree with you BH although they may release a volumetric's update before the start of EWT.

You are correct rodster, I'm happy to hold. persimmon, I'll pass on your kind offer if you don't mind.

Not really rodster I just resent someone throwing all their toys out of the pram for no good reason.
If you want to have a go then refer me to any post I have made that could be classified as a de-ramp.

Just been catching up on the chat.
I see that deemule has blocked me for being a"de ramper"
So, can anyone refer me to any post where I have de reamped ? I can't think of any. I have my own opinions of what should/may/hopefully happen. I hold in excess of 20 mill shares here at a slightly higher average than the current sp & I resent some of the carp that people post here on both sides of the fence.
I think that any CPR that may be embarked upon before any EWT is irrelevant, we need to prove the oil/ gas is mobile to get the biggest bang for our buck. Just my opinion.
deemule, if you don't like what I say fair enough but don't accuse me of anything other than being a lth who wants to see success here. If you don't like what I post fair enough but don't get up on your high horse about it as it makes you look like a d1ck.
In short, fook you.

Sorry Rubey, typed without my glasses hence the spelling error.

I'm afraid RNS is about right on this one Rudey. The more info to put in the CPR the better. If they were to do one now they'd have ro do another one after the tests anyway.

All the hallmarks of a buy on rumor sell on fact I'm afraid..
I've held here for a number of years & it finally looks as tho' RM HAS GOT THINGS TOGETHER.
as an aside I think shorting, effectively borrowing shares from holders without their knowledge should be banned. No doubt I will get pilloried for that by "traders" who lord it uo with their good one's whilst omitting their losers.

OEIC even.

Can anyone refer me to anything that says RBD is an OIEC ?

$3 per bbl of recoverables seems a bit on the low side to me harel. Are there any examples out there ?