Member Info for twix386

Slich

That being said, why do you suppose the BOD bought heavily in the Funding?

So since destressed 0.3p funding we seem to have found a further consistent discount. On all past form this looks like years more with further funding issues because to think otherwise completely goes against all past experience and outcomes.

Just a thought only....

if INEX chose to pay the US$1M (loan agreement) as a lumo sum at or near the end of payment term then were China to invade Taiwan, we would keep the US$ 1M upfront plus any earn our to date and get Taiwan returned and in that scenario could happen anytime up to approx late Summer 2025!

Whereupon our received funds would be spent and what value Taiwan? Let's hope INEX don't want to accrue 7% interest or pay a backend lump sum.

And btw, the buffer is already built in with the words UP TO. It already has a buffer. Are you suggesting we need a Double Buffer. lol

Priceless!

Good night davand and thanks for the humour. You went all the way with it, without blinking pmsl

Thanks davand

What a swell guy you are - even if arithmetic isn't your thing :-)

Anyway, enough of a laugh for today remedial man

Clearly he thinks you're too vulnerable as you've just demonstrated. Apparently up to 7 days means pick a number up to at least 10.

You do look like a complete prat

Correct clark8004

Plainly obvious!!

Lol davand. I simply don't like reading rot.

and you think I have trouble understanding what up to 7 days means. It simply CANNOT mean 9 or 10 days. Period!

I can do without posters who positively spin facts into versions of fact and fantasy. Seen it too much including from our salesman, LR. It's disingenuous and loses credibility.

Hemo, Yes, let's have a new Countdown Clock.

How long since our first one? Must be well over a year ago.

Guys, I want to see delivery of LONG promised shareholder value. We've not seen it through years of progress, countdown clock, optimism, spin, excitement and bs. We've had the opposite!

So the definition of UP TO 7 days could mean 9/10 days. lol

Do you really believe that davand?

Seriously!!

or is it the suspension of reality by investors I've seen time and again and argued against when in light of historic failures and unmet expectations we can read statements and redefinie optimistic interpretations of them.

A new monicker for you......Over Optomistic Guy

or DCooper lol

aimho

Yes surely a big improvement on 8 hours.

i would imagine if good for 7 days they wouldn't use the old 'dont legally hold me to it' trick of UP TO.

Let's remember the spin Mistro LR is still selling the snake oil here. I wouldn't be at all surprised if up to 7 days means commercially you must rely on a lower number.

Only note of issue I see is how long can you commercially RELY on in an UP TO 7 days? The words and actual numbers on days5, 6 and 7 matter.

Indeed. it's simply farcical and unbelievable that the person with overall responsibility for this mess hasn't been shown the door already. Just how bad would it need to be!!!!!

Ranger REVOLUTION- that we hear about none stop nowadays. Winning contracts no doubt but Revolution....Nah!

Indeed

Sometimes words can hardly do justice to crushed expectations interspersed with debacle that this positive-on-paper yet serial let down delivers.

Tell me OG

on news of the Taiwan sale did you expect a stronger rise? I did!

Just one more example of expectations on paper being regularly confounded/disappointing.

We need to hear Ranger is getting real traction to deliver a Revolution as now it's the only game in town with the possibility to deliver for long termer. I fear i am queing for another disappointment and unmet achievement.

How long ago was it now we had the exciting countdown clock!

How msny times have the positives on paper been confounded or upturned? Relentlessly!!

But it wasn't a buy signal from British Bulls though. It was a stay long after a Buy signal, with narrative highly negative leaning.

Hardly OG

You really are the Optomistc Guy

Did you read it...A negative tilt highly likely to change etc

Because I see virtually no chance in winning litigation and prefer to let AL steer unencumbered without BOD distracted by an attempt to hold to account. Looking at what I consider best going forward.

I had fears and slated areas of the company. Looks like I had a point. However, Nobody including me and the NUT ever saw this degree of cash mismanagement and we all acted as though it was an impossibility. (NUT to Stalk)

Hold LR to account and vote at AGM if he's there in a few short months otherwise let AL and even BOD