Member Info for Twenty-Four

Having read some of the rubbish over the last couple of days. I have no sympathy for the shorters. With time ticking it seems that a sale is being lined up. If the value went anywhere near that indicated on SimplyWallStreet, we'd all be laughing!! £7 phew..... However I'd be more than happy with 60p and above. Hope share does not come out of suspension and I hope we end up with a few less shorters to deal with in the future!!!

Already filtered earlier this morning....

"Princess Louise" sounds like the name for a good ship too.

Both still suspended.

I remember you are. Did meet Antos and made my decision on the meeting I attended last year. I was the only investor to turn up!

SNT since Jan, but feel reasonably confident on outcome there. BOU a little nervous about. Here, again reasonably confident. Nothing is for sure, but did put get an extra 500,000 shares yesterday. Let's hope timing was good!

Excitement and nervous!! My 3rd share suspended now! Bould, Sabien & Eurasia.....

Sorry Mohsin, was driving, but did see that a link had been sent.

The Sunday Times mentioned 50% of Evolene Valley. The Disruptive website mentions developing "the valley". A guesstimate could be 10% of RTO target asset value, if so would that value Sabien at?

Initially I didn't think that 87,000 sqm could be square miles, but then why bother mentioning square metres on a website? Looking at the Evolene Valley area it is 81 sq mi .... so perhaps it is square miles, which would include the other properties mentioned and the purchase of the adjacent village? Anyway, all speculation until confirmed by an RNS.

I was wondering that brotherhood. Some RNS holdings updates have individuals named, so not sure how accounts are compromised? People giving out holdings are sending a message that their shares are in sticky hands, perhaps that is not in the interest of some others?? Otherwise I'm failing to see what the problem is?

Jace, I was told it around this time last month, it came 2nd hand, but I choose to believe the person whom I heard it from. If true, then either the BOD may have been able to renegotiate, or they may have needed to move on to another target company.

Except, as I've posted before, it could be that the initial target turned out to be too expensive?

I also contacted IFC and Tim replied. Since my email it is worth noting that their website has now been updated and mentions their appointment to aid BOU in an RTO and re-admission.

ML did not speak to me direct, as said 2nd hand. To a degree it makes sense. However, who knows maybe the BOD have been able to renegotiate, or looking over other targets. Matters not really, we just have to be patient and await news...... I for one very much hope that something suitable is acquired.

Jace, it wasn't spoken in confidence and it was regarding a comment that Martin Lampshire had made to someone else, i.e. 2nd hand.

Hi Jace, it was me who posted. I was talking to someone who knows one of our Board members here, dealing with that acquisition. I was told that the company they were looking at, was too expensive. You do not have to believe me, however I do believe it.... I'm in here more than most, so I am looking for a positive outcome.

I think it was, but as mentioned it was a snippet of a conversation with someone who knows one of our BOD and so it was 2nd hand. I couldn't really dig! Was feeling much the same, at least something going on in the background. Patience required......

I'm assuming that is/was the case, at the time.

I did pick up on the grapevine last week that one target the company had in mind was too expensive. No more detail than that. Perhaps they have continued to renegotiate, perhaps they have other targets in mind? Like all, awaiting further official news from the company.