Member Info for TWatcher

"simply scum....just being polite as always" Calderkate

I suspect that a lot more savvy people than any of us here will look at ODX, and if they see any value in the company will simply make a bid to take it private.

"just being polite as always"
"simply scum"

"Yes and I stand by what I say"

Whatever you say boris :)

Calderkate:"
Twatch- Not a new rule just being polite as always, untill anyone becomes aggressive or attempts to try and ridicule,belittle,or insult then I will obviously speak up for myself"

A sample of "polite as always calderkate"
"See how some people change their posts when they get a good buy in price TOTAL SCUM some people been scaring shareholders on here and when they get in they change their attitude ABSOLUTE SCUM"
https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/calderkate/?page=69

"simply scum" (aimed at me)
https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/calderkate/?page=63

"And your parasitic tendencies shine through day in day out TWATCH"
https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/calderkate/?page=52

You might prefer to whitewash out of your mind your posting history, but LSE keeps it

in the contract

It was always the range of the potential value of the contract, it was never a minimum.The contract was 100s pages long containing literally dozens and dozens of conditions any one of which would mean it resulted in zero output. Its not like "sign this contract, you will definitely get £50M no matter what". . it transpired for example, that ODX needed to have a validated test by a particular date..quelle surprise. It was hardly "signed on this dotted line, and we will give you at least £50M".

In fact ODX now has to paid HMG £2.5M.

Those are the facts.

"Not arguing with you as don't know who anyone is on here"

Must be a new rule for kate :)

"If only they were as shrewd in their contract dealings and sales department...they would not be in this mess.."

Seems to me like the directors only get their thinking caps on when it involves securing wages for another while. You can be sure they know every detail of their contract of employment, wages holidays, sick leave, redundancy package...but know that a gov order expired a month earlier ?....no chance.

"transformational", there speakth someone that does not know the ODX history of that word.

and now ABDX is promoting 4 boxes of antigen tests for the price of 3, £1.73 per test including VAT.

paid nearly twice that for a coffee just now, looks like they are finding it hard to even give them away. Covid revenue for everyone is definitely in the past.

"Kate....why do you always waste your precious saliva "

I know reggies had a self-confessed habit of spewing over his keyboard, but exactly how do you think calderkate types ?

Name of purchaser "spreadex limited"

"In relation to spread betting, Spreadex Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Spread betting carries a high level of risk to your capital and can result in losses larger than your initial stake/deposit. It may not be suitable for everyone so please ensure you fully understand the risks involved. "

quality investor.... :)

yes, absolutely everyone in the relevant sector knows that ODX is in a desperate state of affairs, and therefore they will be looking to pay fire-sale prices for anything ODX is trying to offload. So it may indeed cost them more money to sell it, than to just shelve it.

Reggies told us that the the main stay of ODX was all he was really interested in anyway, so all must be good if "the regulator" said so....right ?

To be able to push news you need actual news.

Website promoted via tweet by ABDX.

They are sell both the ABC19 (£7 per test, box of 25), and the biosure antibody test (£26 each, £90 for 4). I thought these also required CDTA approval before they could be used in the UK, even for professional use.

passing interesting for ODX these days of course

"Odx will survive without a scintillating doubt and don't ever listen to the advice of this loser called CaptainSwag please! It's your investment and not Captain's ."

Whilst guaranteeing readers absolute 100% surety of the future success of ODX, it appears you overlooked a couple of facts that readers might need to dial into their assessment of you guarantee.

1) You stated on the 31st of march "I'm down £70k but hey, it's only in paper loss". This might inform others of your prior ODX investment decision making, and allow them to attribute appropriate value to your current assessment. It would also inform them how much you need others to buy into ODX to recoup those massive paper losses. https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/karaleva/

2) "it's your investment, not Karaleva's"

"In other words, right now, director remuneration is broadly in line (if not slightly lower) to peers."

ODX is loss making, given the dire cash position, directors remuneration is entirely sourced from ongoing fundraising, and this is not a business that is in early stage development, where that might be acceptable, ODX is almost the exact opposite of that, the 'promise' is gone, in my opinion, a company whose share price is actually worth less than its nominal SP. If this last fund raise attempt doesn't save the company, they are out of options ("the options for the Company were extremely limited", to quote the RNS), and to me the potential fundraise is way under what they actually need...but of course if the primary purpose is simply to provide for salaries for another while......

Which other peers have taken a £1+ SP company and under their direction, turned it into a <4p SP company.

"Then ODX should have avoided the share dropping to 4p to enable them to get a listing away with a decent discount."

I don't necessarily disagree, but in terms of the list of things ODX should have done over the last 18 months, it quite low down.

Calder "never knowingly expressing an opinion of substance on ODX" Kate, to give her her full title.

AS oke mentioned some time ago, and confirmed in the RNS, it is not possible to issue shares at less than 4p, as that is the nominal price of an ODX share. Lesson for the next gen AIM companies, make your nomnal price 1p, then you can potentially screw shareholders 4x more.

"As the nominal value of 4.0 pence for each Ordinary Share establishes the minimum issue price for new Ordinary Shares, the options for the Company were extremely limited"