Member Info for Trisor

Is this genuine? Has this actually been sent? Where did you get hold of this ? It’s wrong of course if you read the RNS and the Q and A. 3m only comes in full if the Sp does ok. The author should have concentrated on the comment that there were several catalysts to keeping the sp up.

Where did you get this from Nanoo?

What’s this letter Nanoo?

The RNS suggests that from sept 2022 there were certain costs that would be non recurring but I can’t quantify those

I believe it was research and development, working capital in respect of last year . See September 2022 RNS . Don’t know how much of the 1.8 ish report in June 22 has gone

UG are you invested in NNN?

My age is irrelevant to your peasantry

Nanogold- why don’t you post your exact post to the company. Please tell me it’s not along the lines of your usual posts on here!!! Ha

UG you really are on a sticky wicket

Firstly I suggest you look at the English dictionary definition of the word shortly

Secondly by admitting it could mean anything , it could ofcourse literally mean soon , being imminently.

The other hilarious comment you have made is the one about destroying Lansted’s value. No doubt Lansted was given the opportunity to add to their holding and declined. There are a myriad of reasons they might have declined.

I will agree with you on one thing. The deal struck with Lansted may have bad because it didn’t on the face of it envisage a delay in contracts coming to fruition. It was clear that would have a downward effect on the Sp causing Lansted to sell of shares and ensuring the contribution to NNN to be less and less making a placing more necessary . If that is the case, that reflects poorly. Alternatively, Langsted’s strategy was to sell its free shares plus plus whatever the situation to ensure it had the funds to cater for future larger contributions in the future.

The problem with you UG is that you are a rude little twit. I don’t mind a discussion and I don’t mind be told I’m wrong but what I do mind is your inane insulting tone. You seem to have crossed swords with many on here. Happy to give as good I get if necessary but I would please respectfully request that you stop being aggressive

You invested UG?

UG - get lost.

Hope that’s succinct enough for you

Shortly means decades. You total plonker

Wonder how many Lansted have sold? Hope they will have soon made enough to cover future installments

Or alternatively UG the people (whomever they may be) who are putting 400k in must have some idea that deals are not far off . I’m putting forward an alternative view, that’s all. Otherwise with the price history on this the Sp will fall more, so I wouldn’t see the point of their commitment. We also have the RNS explicitly referring to the word “shortly”. This is important written evidence.

Victory laps are best run at the final whistle. Many a winning goal is scored in the final minute

Think 18m a sell and 21 a buy. Very strange. I’ve never seen (on this share) that size get through in one go

We then have a 21m sell. Who is doing this and why?

Is that a buy or sell? And wtf is going on ?

Nanoo hate to break it to you but given what Lansted has dumped since December unlikely LTH dumping will make much difference now.

No I don’t know Duffin, but heard him speak at the AGM. The whole team seemed a good bunch to me. Those I spoke to really enthusiastic answer full of ambition and hope.

Now can you answer my question truthfully ?

One man’s troll is another man’s guru

Wayne must at the very least be a 3 Michelin curry… lol

Havegun let’s hope so