Member Info for Trisor

I agree EXMS.

UG please can you compare and contrast on a cost, benefit and efficacy basis. Plopping up something as direct completion is like me posting a link to a ford and suggesting it’s comparable to a Bentley

We’ve done this before UG. This is a new product . There are also 16 products proposed with an ambition to get near to 100 . Will these be bought remains to be seen. Hopefully yes.

Agreed UG . Will need an effective marketing campaign and visible differentiators. Small steps UG.

You are right tuan , nobody cares but clearly you are nothing but an uninvested deramper. Stephen and you fall in the same bracket for me.

UG small incremental steps. Apparently according to the website, it’s same effect using less resource so it should be cheaper

Err Tuan it’s nothing like that

Fair enough …I shall assume you are another non invested troublemaker

Tuan according to the RNS they have facilities which they are improving . Hopefully the 400 k has partially gone towards that

Tuan I would appreciate it if you could tell me if YOU are invested. It’s a simple question you keep on avoiding.

Should I assume you have none?

I’m sorry you feel that way UG . I sincerely hope the tide is turning. We’ve developed some products . We seem to have partners. Short term funding aside I’m really excited by what I’m seeing here. Last 18 months has seen

1. A new strategy
2. A new BOD
3. New websites
4. Products
5. New corporate structure
6. Financing (albeit) not in great terms
7. Partnerships with third parties which may lead to contract wins and other R & D projects
8. New and improved facilities ( to be completed)
9. New equipment which can generate fast supply
10. JV with Volz plus Filtech participation and saving cost on a stand

Is any of the above perfect? No. Ofcourse not but there are small incremental advancements here which you just can’t get your 80s style Chips dark gold rimmed sunglasses around.

All the above is a matter of public record now as you are aware. It’s frustrating the time it’s taken. Funding is a concern for me and we will need to see how this will be dealt with.

UG- I’m not sure who my leader is but this company has come a long way in 18 months. We could be on the verge of some decent contract wins. I hope one day you may be on the winning side of this discussion.

Funding is an issue ofcourse. We need to see what happens . Ofcourse I’m concerned about the short term and hope they have reduced expenses, sell some products and complete some deals

Tuan are YOU invested?

Where was the insult UG? And I have asked those questions of myself . I do everyday. We’ll see what happens shall we?

Isn’t it obvious he bought in and then sold?

UG have you sold. Had a blissful 3 working days without you

Payment page change would be nice. Lansted have approx 380 m shares with what 16 months to go. As they have no cap (see RNS) on a potential upside over 73.3 benchmark I expect them to hedge for the rest of the agreement. That means (in the absence of catastrophe) they’ll probably be selling from to time over that period unless everything takes off then they may not. I’m happy about the websites but we need to see a viable funding plan and ofcourse some revenue

Any placing I would hope would come together with decent news. I think there are about 200 m shares which can be allocated without authority

Syrup that seems to even things out if you take last nights trade into account. What’s the significance (if anything ) of the 2 ?

This just popped up

03-Apr-23 16:47:29 0.1882 36,738,759 Unknown* 69.14k O
03-Apr-23 16:47:29 0.1882 -36,738,759 Unknown* -69.14k O

Cheers Sinden