Member Info for Tracylied

Really one volume buyer is all that is needed. Even 500k would kill any floating stock.

I can only assume that they have a secret stash if shares to sell. Clearly they were expecting sells today and it is not the first time we have seen this. I wonder what David thinks of the share price.

I have attached took a couple of thousand shares. I still have free trading credits so I just take small chunks at zero commission.
Unless they place well below market price funding will derisk the whole process. I believe that the market does not understand this company. I guess David must be double gutted holding at IPO and 40p. No way he will place at a prostitutional value unless it is to himself.

It's a graphic demo of the flows through the UPF at super rapid speed. Beyond that it's aimed at people who use this kit or have use for it. The point is to demonstrate the speed, volume and versatility of the application.
Well beyond my understanding

Share price being walked down into a expected fund raising. There is a very strong chance that it won't happen. I will take a few small chunks this week. If there is no fundraising or a single placing with a partner it will look very cheap. I will put another 20k here, some before and some on the way back up. 30p would be acceptable to me.

I believe that they are simply keeping their options open. Even if they place with one investor they still need the permission of shareholders.
I guess it depends if you think that David Levi is a complete fool buying at 40p then placing at 20p. A placing which he will likely take part in. I will definitely be buying before the 22nd and I expect a funding option to be revealed immediately after. The result of the grant application will say nothing about the business model. It either fits the criteria or not.

Why? If the shares are exchanged for cash the cash becomes a asset supporting the share price. I believe that the prospect of a placing is holding the price back.

It may be that the only way in for a institution is a premium. They certainly cannot take a stake from the market. We don't know the demand but I suspect that either a Chinese or Israeli investor will want part of this.
I doubt David can buy any more given the circumstances. I suspect that he will take more in a placing. Doesn't much matter to me if it is at 30p as long as I can buy more at a similar price.
I cash flow is building the amount required may be quite small

I suspect that the finals will be after the funding situation is resolved. Hopefully we'll get some information on new opportunities.

I believe that unless the grant is announced by the Innovation department in Israel we won't hear until the EGM. They went already from first week in June to before the EGM. I suspect that they anticipated this making the EGM so far in the future from the point of announcement.
My first thought when I read the RNS today was that a Chinese investor had approached Ethernity or even a partner/customer and they needed a broker with access to deal.
I suspect that it would be to secure some exclusivity or favourable terms on a deal done or in the pipeline.
If I were reliant on Ethernity I would want a part of the action and influence. Ethernity are open to 100% of the market and can trade with both sides of the argument. You may have guessed that I really like this position.

If any opportunity comes to shareholders to maintain percentage in a placing I am in.

Yes agree. I don't know how easy it is for Chinese investors based in China to buy on the Aim but from a profile and exposure side it is a good move.
The moron in DC is ramping up the China attacks to distract from his inability to lead so we can expect America and China to distance themselves even more. This is a huge problem for American tech which is well behind the curve. They will certainly need neutrals like Ethernity to access solutions that they cannot generate at home. Whilst they seek to isolate actually they just isolate themselves.

Hardly splashing the cash and cash positive very soon. In January 2018 they announced that the adoption of the next generation was a year behind the original timeline. At that point it was likely that they would need to top up prior to mass production and sales. Mass production is underway in several areas of the business but the rewards are 2021 for the royalty stream.
I see several options for funding and I don't think that they will have any trouble acquiring it on favourable terms. The government grant is an option as is additional directors funding or a boutique Israeli tech institution. This share is extremely tightly held and free float is really nothing. After news it is impossible to buy in quantity, buying small and often on dips is my strategy.

I have attached suspect that they are hoping to pick up some cheap shares to balance their positions. I don't think that the current price has any significance. David should have inside info about the funding so will be unable to buy. I am sitting another few days and will buy more maybe a penny or two cheaper. Not wanting to get involved in the MMs games

Just clearing the funding uncertainty will help a lot.

On the 15th May the RNS states that the result of the grant application is now expected before the EGM. It was always expected before the EGM but previously it was stated first week in June.

Jan 2018 I bought £500 worth. After the big drop that carried on giving. Fortunately I started very small

10 years ago yesterday Ethernity received a substantial R&D grant from the Israeli government. Hopefully that will be a positive sign

So where did WINS get 5000 shares to sell at 38p

Given the grip that the two founding Directors have and a couple of institutions any approach would need to be friendly. So what do you think they would accept. Certainly not less than IPO £1.30. I doubt less than £3. However the value to others when they can simply partner will need to be on multiple levels.
What is it worth to stop a direct competitor gaining advantage over you in a multi billion sector. It may be as much about stopping as starting.

These are not blue-sky miners but development costs money. I don't think that cash is what attracts them it's advantage, shortcuts and exclusive access. That's why I think that it's now or never for a buyout. Ethernity are engaging partners and some of those may be direct competitors to an interested party.
I believe that Ethernity have a unique middle ground a can sell to all sides. Many won't even know that Ethernity make their solutions work.