Member Info for Tracylied

Long term it is fine. This share has always been illiquid and when it is in a falling trend it is nearly impossible to sell. It is a risk and we are all very aware if it. We have seen one or two trades a week before and I guess if anyone needs access to funds it is not for them. I have always bought when it's quiet and hold for the long term.

I haven't been locked down anywhere so far. Certainly nothing to see here. I just think that we are in a low volume stagnation pool for the next few months. I don't think that the market is mature enough to generate progress for a while yet. The share price is still low but I believe that it will decrease before moving on February or March.

I don't have an outboard. Blocked up on the hard for repairs so won't be moving for a few weeks. Freezing here as well. Waiting on spares from France. Can't wait for the summer.
Ethernity are looking in a similar way at the moment.

No real margin in trading this share. Next news could be 6-8 weeks away realistically. H2 will be lively for news. It will be interesting to see how resilient holders are. I expect to see a few sells through and opportunities to buy below todays price.

34.6/35.10 currently online. The wind was taken from the sails and now we drift aimlessly. I will take more sub 30 I suspect.

It's really a slang word to say everything is good but can be said enthusiastically as this was to mean better than good.
I always do my homework and cultivate contacts. I am a proper stalker. I could have a camera and mic in Davids office but I can't understand a word he says.
My contact is close but isn't motivated to say much. People are easy to contact.

Bid I believe that you could take it as pure speculation from anyone other than the CFO. Of course it is obvious as they don't seemed bothered by the strike price and converted into volume.
The CFO will know these people for sure.
For what it is worth my contact says that they are not sellers, she/he are very close to the source but I suspect that their view is secondhand or overheard.
I can tell you that the company are Sababa. The workload is high and they are doing business. How that translates to revenue and time frames I have no idea.

No reason to buy now that we know 5G are selling. I suspect people will just sit out and watch. No reason to sell no reason to buy so here we are. Try selling 20k, I was offered 28.5p. At 5000 they offered 34.6p.
It is a shame but quite predictable. Any buying on news will just trigger more 5G shares. It is now a hold for me.

I think given the disclosure yesterday that the CFO thinks (interpreted as knows) 5G fund are selling and therefore are likely to in the future it is holding up well.
Certainly I won't buy more to line their pockets. I will wait for a balanced market to return. Fed with shares not going through the book is not a game that I will be playing. I will look back again in a few weeks.

Dallo it is not his place to state the bleeding obvious. A major shareholders action or inaction is a regulatory matter. It is not for speculation by the CFO. It is disappointing that this has happened.
It is not inside information it is opinion from a CFO. How he shares that opinion is important. It is very reasonable to assume that he has access to the people or persons behind the fund. We all know when they get the shares but we don't know what they do with them. They could very well have no interest in the weak regulator or be about to submit the notice tomorrow. They could be a fragmented fund working for several investors not in concert. These are all avenues for speculation by shareholders. None of this is an avenue the CFO should be going down by email to a shareholder.
That's all I am saying on it.

What's wrong is that he is the CFO and it is reasonable to assume that he knows who 5G fund are as no doubt he was involved in the market access arrangement. He is now commenting on this situation to a shareholder. I don't know how you can think it is right.

Dallo you are required to notify the market. The CFO is not permitted to disclose intentions or actions of shareholders. If they had a notifiable interest they should have disclosed it if they then sell then again they should disclose it. It is not for the CFO to speculate such matters.

The CFO should not be offering opinion like that. It does not offend me it just should not be happening. To be suggesting if a major shareholder is buying or selling is well beyond any discussion the CFO should be having with a shareholder. Either he knows and is disclosing or it is unprofessional rumour. Whichever it is wrong.

What a shame that he responded in such a way. I assume that he didn't think that you would be posting his thoughts. In his position when he speculates in such a way it undermines the process.
Clearly the MMs have a supply, they had it long before 5G fund however now he flags supply to the market which will respond accordingly when shares are released.
The fact that he hasn't received a notification yet is for the market to interpret. If the company has an opinion it should not be expressed in a email to a shareholder.

36.25/36.45 online.. MMs squeezed and a bit more will remove 37p

The point of doing it is that they don't retrospectively adjust. It's a tool in the confidence box the MMs use.

https://ethernitynet.com/2021-trends-part-i-fpgas-become-the-de-facto-platform-for-network-disaggregation/

They aren't Policed and who is going to do anything. Yes they try to create an impression that some may be suckered into but the trend will pick this up and the MMs know it.
They will burn in the sun.

Agreed and even though they compete they work in concert against us all. It is the wild west and the Sheriff is AWOL.

It just needs to build a platform above 30p and it will go to 40p with no further help.