RE: Bollarks5 Oct 2016 23:38
Ah Goldy...maybe you should change your name to 360 degrees?
Lets share a few gems from you, just so any Newbies might get the wrong idea you knew what you're talking about!
Not a great analogy Toxic, not least because the buck will/has still stopped with Green to sort out the pensions and he'll likely be stripped of his knighthood anyway.
Let me give you a better analogy. If you were entering or trying to broaden your scope in the financial services sector would you want to fark off the FCA and undermine it?
2 Sep '16
Look at the new scope of OGA powers, no oilie big or small will want to upset the because like it or not they have the power, more so than any sovereign backed entity.
2 Sep '16
I don't share your opinion and labeling management as below par is just lazy unless of course you'd like to share with us what par management looks like or could have done better?
2 Sep '16
100% ownership of a field development ready and technically signed off by the OGA after the biggest financial meltdown since the Depression. I'd say that was quite impressive but maybe you can't see that through your crack pipe haze.
2 Sep '16
The wise owl Paul Mumford and his chums currently hold 34 oil and has stocks including biggies such as Total, BP and Schlumberger (to name a few) and of course Xcite at 8.7M shares. Of these 34 stocks Xcite represents the third largest by % of shares outstanding. Cavendish holding in Xcite remains static and unmoved by the SP. I'd rather watch the actions of seasoned and acclaimed pros than read and react to the BS posted endlessly on this board. All publicly available information. Bon weekend all.
2 Sep '16( I love the last bit ...a done deal ..yeah right)
They dumped another junior recently at a big loss ( I won't mention who because I have too much respect for people's hard earned, if you want to cc your choice)...why keep the faith here? Probably because they sniff a done deal.
Then when the penny ...finally drops ...
28 Sep '16
Just one of the many many misleading statements made by Rupert and His Band of Merrymen.
28 Sep '16
The ambiguity of that statement was never in doubt... it's more a case of realising that ABSOLUTELY EVERY WORD that left that man's lips was BS.
28 Sep '16
The wider point is that when one looks at many of the statements that the Bod have made over the years it, in my mind, moves this from simply poor Bod performance to something darker.
When did the Bod move out of the Aberdeen offices, at the time it was 'cost saving' but did they already know the game was up, or their legal representatives advising that the company could continue as a going concern for the foreseeable future and then within weeks shareholders left with 1.5%. Was this ambiguity designed to ensure that there were no hiccups with alterations to the Articles which it wouldn't surprise me safeguarded directors interests...and all the while any questions or objections met with the mysterious NDAs.
This stinks
Sign In
Follow the stocks
