Member Info for Townman

Kong

I think Tom Evans may personally want to express his response to your points. IMHO he made a very valuable contribution to the business. I see his Globalvision work as being the way forward for PPP.

I just cannot gain any trust in S Lunn based on his contribution and communications to date. For the benefit of all existing PPP shareholders I only hope that Robert M can sort this situation out. I have now voted towards giving him more freedom to do that.

Bobrad

What is that meant to mean? I thought it was knitting fog anyway

Bobrad

Of course the accounts (and the future board structure) matter.

MYIPA

Thank you for the prompt and your justification. Still no sign of any PPP accounts. Information is just not forthcoming so my vote is now cast. I am fed up of waiting for a PPP response and do not want a protracted legal skirmish.

Zak

That RNS dropping is overdue. The chairman's reaction to existing shareholders and keeping them genuinely informed is way below par. I expected PPP information (including further AGM resolutions) and it has not been forthcoming. My vote has now been cast appropriately I truly believe for the benefit of all existing PPP shareholders

Cando66

It really ought to be deleted or the title changed at the very least.

Zak

Ok. Thank you. Accepted

Zak

Yes MYIPA I have no idea what Zak is talking about regarding my shareholding

Zak

My shareholding is my business and so will my voting be. Waiting for further information and not touted by rubbish brain washing content and thread titles

If admin were doing a less manipulative job any thread with this title would certainly be deleted . It is ludicrous really

Growmorecash

Just to be sensible and waited.

Zag

Just want the best for PPP and shareholders. Do not wish to be manipulative so quiet it is until more factual news

Timbo

Yes. I only try to encourage remaining existing shareholders to wait for the impending official and perhaps other informative news. How the hell did that contravene rules to justify so much deletion??

Zag

The site is corrupted in my view

"It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly."

Timbo

Total manipulation . The application of the rules is a nonsense

"it is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly."

Hepran

Well some people are allowed to be as abusive as they want in here. My experience is that there is a bias and I do not understand the deletion of numerous posts (and threads) totally without explanation that clearly do not contravene any reasonable rules.

Kong

We all await further factual information hopefully

Dealer 55

Do you know who is manipulating this site? I am just interested

New uncle

Surely more information will come directly from official and very senior channels. Merse endeavoured to discuss the other day. We all just need to wait IMHO

Growmorecash

My agenda always has been to not be hasty voting because there will certainly be more information. Turkeys Christmas come to mind until that anticipated information is at hand. What really is your agenda issue?