Member Info for Townman

I really could not disagree with you more regarding the best interests of shareholders. Please do more thorough research before you make a decision

I have done Robert because I fear more personal control by S Lunn

Want the better chance of a good PPP future really has to be a vote no regarding the GM Simples

What a joke comment about the audit H. What was the other part of the delay?

Olaf very probably yes. Robert surely not, pending his reveal 🙏

Http://tiny.cc/0vcn001

Http://tiny.cc/0vcn001

It reallybought to be squeaky bum time.

Do hope it was a no Robert for the ultimate benefit of all existing shareholders.

Correction. Definitely rubbish. Has to be a no.

Just in case it was missed earlier. May this letter link be pinned anyway?

http://tiny.cc/0vcn001

Perhaps abstain then Robert. A yes vote gives evil power.

If an investigation was to take place may Mr Lunn be suspended for the duration?

Nobody has said a no yet though. Care is certainly still needed to protect all existing shareholders

It still does not need to be us and them

Not really the case. Sorry if it sounds like that. We are still in for a bumpy ride and we all know Lunn is untrustworthy.

United works. However, the TG group will still needs to be well controlled to ensure none of the previous negative disruption and leakage.

I for onevwould rather have an exited SL and delayed comeback than an earlier comeback and controlling SL

Thank you. Hoping the truth and good will out. We have suffered long enough

Unimpressed. SL is not the man for PPP