Member Info for Tornadotony

I just read the RNS again and can not believe where the SP is on that news. Someone has thrown the baby out with the bath water.

Thank you for the gift.

Between 140-141p on the day. I suspect AAz will be one of the very few stocks to do well in Q4.

Christmas arrived 4 months and 17 days early.

Sadly we have a second wave epidemic arriving and one could see how anxious the Deputy CMO was on television last night as the trickle of patients coming into the NHS is a warning of what may happen next week. Medical staff will want safe treatment tools in their kit bag especially as some of the casualties on the wards are NHS staff themselves. This product in my opinion is an essential item to include.

I have been looking at the Goliathberg -1 map site and it does appear to be the best prospect in that entire block.
I have been informed that Rahul will give a presentation tomorrow.

Interim reports in previous years are in 3rd week of September. So the earliest 17 September latest 22 September.

The efficacy improvement is on par with a 20 year cigarette smoker who has quit after 4 to 5 months. Its equivalent to a young person non smoker who has started physical exercise and after one week may see a similar lung capacity improvement.

I think this go higher myself.

Bought half back at 142p as previous sell now banked after 30 days. Now seeing if it drifts lower or stays flat. I see this week as bottom formation.

Now classified as definite tropical storm building up winds mid Atlantic with current risk of hurricane formation at 15-20%. Keeping an eye if this becomes big. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/refresh/graphics_at2+shtml/203225.shtml?tswind120#contents

If a mine gets flooded or it has to little water its a huge red flag. It has been a major problem in places like Chile. The priority is farmers and people get water first.

Concerns access of adequate water supplies to the mines. This could be rather critical in the forward look. The reason for low divi could be the money may be needed for some critical infrastructure. Overall the share price probably reflects the expectations in the report. I sold out in advance and have missed a few pennies, but would only go back in when I felt the risk of water shortages is priced in. Good luck in any case, but the share has likely support if it retreated in a few months from now.

Hospital data has not been updated since Thursday. When they do bother to update its likely to be higher. If its not it will be in a few days time. The failure to encourage returners from Portugal and Greece to self isolate upon returning to England tells us that we have idiots in charge and still do not understand the basics of epidemiology and spread of this infection.

I put a link on here yesterday about the nature of the Covid-19 pandemic. A vaccine is only relevant for distribution to the older population. So testing it in young people is pointless. The answer is battle station therapies for those infected and getting unwell in hospitals. It is steroid therapies and synairgen interferon nebuliser. These therapies will not give a 100% cure rate,but an 80% reasonably quick recovery is good enough to make elderly fatalities rates to be the same as a normal influenza season. What will make me angry is not having these tools available when we are in a second wave in the winter and are expected to bury another 80,000 people in the UK alone with all the following on economic impacts. Maybe we should gather outside Catherine House in Whitehall if I have the name right across from 10 Downing Street with posters saying interferon nebuliser for Covid-19 patients and why does Dept of Health deny it to patients. After all its legitimate legal protest.

The United Nations forecast the world population at the very least will increase 50% from 2019 levels by 2100. If there were no interventions by technology the 2019 oil usage of nearly 100 M barrels a day would be up to 150 million barrels a day and the world be as a hot as anything. Fortunately technology interventions are happening. The innovations that exist today will bring that long term usage down to 105M barrels a day. Indeed all the renewable effort so far has been levelled out by population growth and has kept oil demand growth to around 1% a year that otherwise would be far higher. Future technology may arise to substitute plastics in some areas we might have electric airplanes, we might have electric motors running ships, we might find ways to avoid medical implants with tissue engineering or whatever. This might bring us down to 40-50M barrels a day, but a lot of oil field exhaustion would also coincide with it. The key inventions will be CO2 and methane absorption devices. I wonder if a lake somewhere will be coated with special bacteria as a big absorption pool or they coat areas of the ocean to pull it in and feed fish at the same time. It may well be crazy ideas like this that change the environment in a positive way and help moderate climate changes. The only way to stop oil growth is having little population growth. Organisations like extinction rebellion need to answer that problem as making new people creates all the challenges that have to be resolved.

Chris its not getting weaker at all. It is spreading below the 50 year ago group with far less transmission to the older population at this moment in time. The virus morbidity has not changed. In fact the article strengthens the need for a product like Synairgen's offering compared to a vaccine. The main issue is morbidity. Mortality comes into play when systems are not in place to protect nursing home residents and older people above 60 being treated in hospitals. Rapid testing of those who tend these risk groups reduces mortality.

https://swprs.org/why-covid-19-is-a-strange-pandemic/

To settle disagreements on if its getting weak or not.

Tony

It then moved up and did not want to give me shares.

Where is the fun, lets have a bit of volatility.

The next phase is the critical step. 80% of inventions like this fail on evaluation. If they succeed then its a huge winner and current investment is a bet on the result. The company has to publish an evaluation protocol. They should seek collaboration with it involving regulators and the imaging professions in developing the protocol. They may need to seek funding for the evaluation and the numbers needed in the study have to be robust to have support on peer review. The company may seek Government funding but may need to mindful this can be time consuming. Overall a wonderful idea but its efficacy has to be proven. Care professionals will demand extensive proof to change their practice.